You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jetspeed-user@portals.apache.org by Phillip Rhodes <rh...@telerama.com> on 2002/11/13 05:48:30 UTC
share same security tables as TDK 2.1?
I am deploying jetspeed for my new project "jsurvey" that is based upon
turbine (TDK 2.1)
Are the security tables compatible between jetspeed and TDK 2.1?
For example, can I use same user, role, group, user_group_role tables
between the applications?
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: share same security tables as TDK 2.1?
Posted by Phillip Rhodes <rh...@telerama.com>.
Extra columns won't hurt! As long as they are there. If I use the Jetspeed
table definitions, my TDK 2.1 apps will be fine.
At 09:13 PM 11/12/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>Almost but not quite.
>We've added 2 columns to the TURBINE_USER table, PASSWORD_CHANGED and
>DISABLED:
>
>CREATE TABLE TURBINE_USER
>(
> USER_ID integer IDENTITY,
> LOGIN_NAME VARCHAR (32),
> PASSWORD_VALUE VARCHAR (32),
> FIRST_NAME VARCHAR (99),
> LAST_NAME VARCHAR (99),
> EMAIL VARCHAR (99),
> CONFIRM_VALUE VARCHAR (99),
> MODIFIED timestamp,
> CREATED timestamp,
> LAST_LOGIN timestamp,
> DISABLED VARCHAR (1),
> OBJECTDATA BINARY,
> PASSWORD_CHANGED timestamp,
> PRIMARY KEY(USER_ID),
> UNIQUE (LOGIN_NAME)
>);
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Phillip Rhodes [mailto:rhodespc@telerama.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:49 PM
> > To: jetspeed-user@jakarta.apache.org
> > Subject: share same security tables as TDK 2.1?
> >
> >
> > I am deploying jetspeed for my new project "jsurvey" that is based upon
> > turbine (TDK 2.1)
> >
> > Are the security tables compatible between jetspeed and TDK 2.1?
> > For example, can I use same user, role, group, user_group_role tables
> > between the applications?
> >
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
> >
>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe,
>e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>For additional commands, e-mail:
><ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
RE: share same security tables as TDK 2.1?
Posted by David Sean Taylor <da...@bluesunrise.com>.
Almost but not quite.
We've added 2 columns to the TURBINE_USER table, PASSWORD_CHANGED and
DISABLED:
CREATE TABLE TURBINE_USER
(
USER_ID integer IDENTITY,
LOGIN_NAME VARCHAR (32),
PASSWORD_VALUE VARCHAR (32),
FIRST_NAME VARCHAR (99),
LAST_NAME VARCHAR (99),
EMAIL VARCHAR (99),
CONFIRM_VALUE VARCHAR (99),
MODIFIED timestamp,
CREATED timestamp,
LAST_LOGIN timestamp,
DISABLED VARCHAR (1),
OBJECTDATA BINARY,
PASSWORD_CHANGED timestamp,
PRIMARY KEY(USER_ID),
UNIQUE (LOGIN_NAME)
);
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phillip Rhodes [mailto:rhodespc@telerama.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 8:49 PM
> To: jetspeed-user@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: share same security tables as TDK 2.1?
>
>
> I am deploying jetspeed for my new project "jsurvey" that is based upon
> turbine (TDK 2.1)
>
> Are the security tables compatible between jetspeed and TDK 2.1?
> For example, can I use same user, role, group, user_group_role tables
> between the applications?
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>