You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to legal-discuss@apache.org by ant elder <an...@gmail.com> on 2013/11/08 20:11:11 UTC
Closing LEGAL-182
Dear Legal Affairs people,
LEGAL-182 appears to have consensus to me but it is still open.
VXQuery are being made to redo a release without the test file using
the license being discussed in LEGAL-182 because the Incubator PMC
pedants wont accept it while this JIRA is not formally closed.
Could one of you Legal Affairs please take it in to your hearts to
help them out and close this JIRA now ASAP before they redo all the
new release work?
TIA,
...ant
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
Re: Closing LEGAL-182
Posted by Henri Yandell <he...@yandell.org>.
I'm not on the other list. I was liking the request for the issue to be
resolved. i.e. non binding +1.
Hen
On Saturday, November 9, 2013, Joseph Schaefer wrote:
> What’s to like? The dishonesty about how release
> votes are counted? Or the pleas to arm ant with
> more finger-wagging authority?
>
>
> Please. Release votes were never required to be
> unanimous. If a simple majority approve of it,
> the release passes. If not, browbeating the opposition
> into submission by overruling them is discourteous
> at best and not likely to garner an affirmative
> vote out of them, so why does this need to be
> settled immediately by a policy ruling rather than
> by simple majority on a one-time basis?
>
>
> On Nov 9, 2013, at 5:36 PM, Henri Yandell <henri@yandell.org<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > The more I use social apps, the more I want to say 'Like' on email :)
> >
> > *Like*
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:11 AM, ant elder <ant.elder@gmail.com<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> > Dear Legal Affairs people,
> >
> > LEGAL-182 appears to have consensus to me but it is still open.
> >
> > VXQuery are being made to redo a release without the test file using
> > the license being discussed in LEGAL-182 because the Incubator PMC
> > pedants wont accept it while this JIRA is not formally closed.
> >
> > Could one of you Legal Affairs please take it in to your hearts to
> > help them out and close this JIRA now ASAP before they redo all the
> > new release work?
> >
> > TIA,
> >
> > ...ant
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org<javascript:;>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org<javascript:;>
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org<javascript:;>
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org<javascript:;>
>
>
Re: Closing LEGAL-182
Posted by Joseph Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com>.
What’s to like? The dishonesty about how release
votes are counted? Or the pleas to arm ant with
more finger-wagging authority?
Please. Release votes were never required to be
unanimous. If a simple majority approve of it,
the release passes. If not, browbeating the opposition
into submission by overruling them is discourteous
at best and not likely to garner an affirmative
vote out of them, so why does this need to be
settled immediately by a policy ruling rather than
by simple majority on a one-time basis?
On Nov 9, 2013, at 5:36 PM, Henri Yandell <he...@yandell.org> wrote:
> The more I use social apps, the more I want to say 'Like' on email :)
>
> *Like*
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:11 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Legal Affairs people,
>
> LEGAL-182 appears to have consensus to me but it is still open.
>
> VXQuery are being made to redo a release without the test file using
> the license being discussed in LEGAL-182 because the Incubator PMC
> pedants wont accept it while this JIRA is not formally closed.
>
> Could one of you Legal Affairs please take it in to your hearts to
> help them out and close this JIRA now ASAP before they redo all the
> new release work?
>
> TIA,
>
> ...ant
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
Re: Closing LEGAL-182
Posted by Henri Yandell <he...@yandell.org>.
The more I use social apps, the more I want to say 'Like' on email :)
*Like*
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:11 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Legal Affairs people,
>
> LEGAL-182 appears to have consensus to me but it is still open.
>
> VXQuery are being made to redo a release without the test file using
> the license being discussed in LEGAL-182 because the Incubator PMC
> pedants wont accept it while this JIRA is not formally closed.
>
> Could one of you Legal Affairs please take it in to your hearts to
> help them out and close this JIRA now ASAP before they redo all the
> new release work?
>
> TIA,
>
> ...ant
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org
>
>