[WEBSITE] [DISCUSS] Arrow-Site blog post

[Matt Topol <zo...@gmail.com>]

Hey All,

Yevgeny Pats has contributed a blog post to the Arrow Site via PR[1].
detailing his company's usage of Arrow for their type system. I've reviewed
it and it looks good to me, but as I'm not a PMC member I didn't want to go
merging it and having it get published without input from others first
along with potentially coordinating *when* we should merge it to publish.

So I'm hoping I can get a bit more eyes on this to give it a look over.

Thanks all!

--Matt

[1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-site/pull/348

Re: [WEBSITE] [DISCUSS] Arrow-Site blog post

[Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>]

Just to follow up with this thread, the blog post is now live:
https://arrow.apache.org/blog/2023/05/04/adopting-apache-arrow-at-cloudquery/

On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 8:09 PM Neal Richardson <ne...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for following up on this. Just a point of order: I don't think PMC
> approval or voting is required to merge to arrow-site. Though I agree that
> it's always good to get more eyes on things we publish to the web.
>
> Neal
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 6:33 PM Will Jones <wi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for highlighting this, Matt.
> >
> > I have added some comments in the document.
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 2:34 PM Ian Cook <ia...@ursacomputing.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Matt,
> > >
> > > I reviewed it and left a few very minor comments. Looks great to me.
> > >
> > > Do any PMC members wish to chime in? If not, it seems OK to give it 72
> > > hours from the time of your email here and then merge it.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Ian
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 11:41 AM Matt Topol <zo...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hey All,
> > > >
> > > > Yevgeny Pats has contributed a blog post to the Arrow Site via PR[1].
> > > > detailing his company's usage of Arrow for their type system. I've
> > > reviewed
> > > > it and it looks good to me, but as I'm not a PMC member I didn't want
> > to
> > > go
> > > > merging it and having it get published without input from others
> first
> > > > along with potentially coordinating *when* we should merge it to
> > publish.
> > > >
> > > > So I'm hoping I can get a bit more eyes on this to give it a look
> over.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks all!
> > > >
> > > > --Matt
> > > >
> > > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-site/pull/348
> > >
> >
>

Re: [WEBSITE] [DISCUSS] Arrow-Site blog post

[Neal Richardson <ne...@gmail.com>]

Thanks for following up on this. Just a point of order: I don't think PMC
approval or voting is required to merge to arrow-site. Though I agree that
it's always good to get more eyes on things we publish to the web.

Neal

On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 6:33 PM Will Jones <wi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for highlighting this, Matt.
>
> I have added some comments in the document.
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 2:34 PM Ian Cook <ia...@ursacomputing.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Matt,
> >
> > I reviewed it and left a few very minor comments. Looks great to me.
> >
> > Do any PMC members wish to chime in? If not, it seems OK to give it 72
> > hours from the time of your email here and then merge it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ian
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 11:41 AM Matt Topol <zo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hey All,
> > >
> > > Yevgeny Pats has contributed a blog post to the Arrow Site via PR[1].
> > > detailing his company's usage of Arrow for their type system. I've
> > reviewed
> > > it and it looks good to me, but as I'm not a PMC member I didn't want
> to
> > go
> > > merging it and having it get published without input from others first
> > > along with potentially coordinating *when* we should merge it to
> publish.
> > >
> > > So I'm hoping I can get a bit more eyes on this to give it a look over.
> > >
> > > Thanks all!
> > >
> > > --Matt
> > >
> > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-site/pull/348
> >
>

Re: [WEBSITE] [DISCUSS] Arrow-Site blog post

[Will Jones <wi...@gmail.com>]

Thanks for highlighting this, Matt.

I have added some comments in the document.

On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 2:34 PM Ian Cook <ia...@ursacomputing.com> wrote:

> Hi Matt,
>
> I reviewed it and left a few very minor comments. Looks great to me.
>
> Do any PMC members wish to chime in? If not, it seems OK to give it 72
> hours from the time of your email here and then merge it.
>
> Thanks,
> Ian
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 11:41 AM Matt Topol <zo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey All,
> >
> > Yevgeny Pats has contributed a blog post to the Arrow Site via PR[1].
> > detailing his company's usage of Arrow for their type system. I've
> reviewed
> > it and it looks good to me, but as I'm not a PMC member I didn't want to
> go
> > merging it and having it get published without input from others first
> > along with potentially coordinating *when* we should merge it to publish.
> >
> > So I'm hoping I can get a bit more eyes on this to give it a look over.
> >
> > Thanks all!
> >
> > --Matt
> >
> > [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-site/pull/348
>

Re: [WEBSITE] [DISCUSS] Arrow-Site blog post

[Ian Cook <ia...@ursacomputing.com>]

Hi Matt,

I reviewed it and left a few very minor comments. Looks great to me.

Do any PMC members wish to chime in? If not, it seems OK to give it 72
hours from the time of your email here and then merge it.

Thanks,
Ian


On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 11:41 AM Matt Topol <zo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hey All,
>
> Yevgeny Pats has contributed a blog post to the Arrow Site via PR[1].
> detailing his company's usage of Arrow for their type system. I've reviewed
> it and it looks good to me, but as I'm not a PMC member I didn't want to go
> merging it and having it get published without input from others first
> along with potentially coordinating *when* we should merge it to publish.
>
> So I'm hoping I can get a bit more eyes on this to give it a look over.
>
> Thanks all!
>
> --Matt
>
> [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-site/pull/348