You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@buildr.apache.org by "Antoine Toulme (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/07/02 09:53:50 UTC
[jira] Resolved: (BUILDR-321) ActsAsArtifact#upload and
ActsAsArtifact#download assume artifact name is already valid maven file
name when uploading
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Antoine Toulme resolved BUILDR-321.
-----------------------------------
Resolution: Invalid
I don't get the use case. Please explain why we should use such mechanism, with specs eventually ?
> ActsAsArtifact#upload and ActsAsArtifact#download assume artifact name is already valid maven file name when uploading
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BUILDR-321
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BUILDR-321
> Project: Buildr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Ittay Dror
>
> In ActsAsArtifact#install, the path in the local repository is computed as: Buildr.repositories.locate(self). this uses only the artifact spec to create the file name.
> ActsAsArtifact#upload does: path = group.gsub('.', '/') + "/#{id}/#{version}/#{File.basename(name)}", which assumes that 'name' is already of the form "#{id}-#{version}"
> same for ActsAsArtifact#download
> I suggest to use something like the locate method in both
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.