You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com> on 2008/04/25 15:52:02 UTC
1.4 examples vs 1.3 examples vs 1.2 examples
AFAIK we currently run 1.2 and 1.3 examples on our wicketstuff box.
Should we keep these alive and add 1.4 examples to the mix?
Martijn
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.2 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.2
Re: 1.4 examples vs 1.3 examples vs 1.2 examples
Posted by Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com>.
dont know if we have to keep the 1.2 examples forever..
But i think it will be able to handle that
its more bamboo that really drains it
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:58 PM, Maurice Marrink <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would be in favor of keeping the old examples available too but i
> know they are a bit of a strain on the server, so maybe we can get
> away with just providing a download link for the old 1.2 examples and
> keeping 1.3 and 1.4 live.
>
> Maurice
>
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Martijn Dashorst
> <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > AFAIK we currently run 1.2 and 1.3 examples on our wicketstuff box.
> > Should we keep these alive and add 1.4 examples to the mix?
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > --
> > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> > Apache Wicket 1.3.2 is released
> > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.2
> >
>
Re: 1.4 examples vs 1.3 examples vs 1.2 examples
Posted by Martijn Dashorst <ma...@gmail.com>.
The examples themselves don't have a big footprint IMO (though the
permgen may get big). Bamboo, Confluence and JIRA are though.
Martijn
On 4/25/08, Maurice Marrink <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would be in favor of keeping the old examples available too but i
> know they are a bit of a strain on the server, so maybe we can get
> away with just providing a download link for the old 1.2 examples and
> keeping 1.3 and 1.4 live.
>
>
> Maurice
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Martijn Dashorst
> <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > AFAIK we currently run 1.2 and 1.3 examples on our wicketstuff box.
> > Should we keep these alive and add 1.4 examples to the mix?
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > --
> > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> > Apache Wicket 1.3.2 is released
> > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.2
> >
>
--
Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
Apache Wicket 1.3.2 is released
Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.2
Re: 1.4 examples vs 1.3 examples vs 1.2 examples
Posted by Maurice Marrink <ma...@gmail.com>.
I would be in favor of keeping the old examples available too but i
know they are a bit of a strain on the server, so maybe we can get
away with just providing a download link for the old 1.2 examples and
keeping 1.3 and 1.4 live.
Maurice
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Martijn Dashorst
<ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> AFAIK we currently run 1.2 and 1.3 examples on our wicketstuff box.
> Should we keep these alive and add 1.4 examples to the mix?
>
> Martijn
>
> --
> Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> Apache Wicket 1.3.2 is released
> Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.2
>