You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@spark.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/10/20 15:38:25 UTC
[GitHub] [spark] sunchao commented on a diff in pull request #38312: [SPARK-40819][SQL] Timestamp nanos behaviour regression
sunchao commented on code in PR #38312:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/38312#discussion_r1000804099
##########
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetSchemaConverter.scala:
##########
@@ -271,6 +271,8 @@ class ParquetToSparkSchemaConverter(
} else {
TimestampNTZType
}
+ case timestamp: TimestampLogicalTypeAnnotation if timestamp.getUnit == TimeUnit.NANOS =>
Review Comment:
Hmm, how is this sufficient? we also should handle the long (nanos) accordingly in the Parquet reader, is that right? e.g.: `ParquetVectorUpdaterFactory`.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org