You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@fluo.apache.org by Christopher <ct...@apache.org> on 2016/07/05 20:16:57 UTC
[DISCUSS] Establishing PPMC
It occurs to me that we haven't actually made it a point to clarify who the
PPMC members are. However, we'll need a PPMC established in order to vote
on releases, before calling a vote on the general@incubator list for IPMC
voting.
I think the PPMC should consist of those on the initial proposal. I believe
this makes sense, since these are the folks who were bootstrapped into the
private@fluo mailing list.
Additionally, I think it makes sense (and is simpler all around, if we
treat PMC == committers).
Re: [DISCUSS] Establishing PPMC
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
+1
Christopher wrote:
> It occurs to me that we haven't actually made it a point to clarify who the
> PPMC members are. However, we'll need a PPMC established in order to vote
> on releases, before calling a vote on the general@incubator list for IPMC
> voting.
>
> I think the PPMC should consist of those on the initial proposal. I believe
> this makes sense, since these are the folks who were bootstrapped into the
> private@fluo mailing list.
>
> Additionally, I think it makes sense (and is simpler all around, if we
> treat PMC == committers).
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Establishing PPMC
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
Seems like there's consensus, so I'll do a PR to update the title on the
people page to PPMC/Committers.
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 8:52 AM Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > It occurs to me that we haven't actually made it a point to clarify who
> the
> > PPMC members are. However, we'll need a PPMC established in order to vote
> > on releases, before calling a vote on the general@incubator list for
> IPMC
> > voting.
> >
> > I think the PPMC should consist of those on the initial proposal. I
> believe
> > this makes sense, since these are the folks who were bootstrapped into
> the
> > private@fluo mailing list.
> >
> > Additionally, I think it makes sense (and is simpler all around, if we
> > treat PMC == committers).
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Establishing PPMC
Posted by Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com>.
+1
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> It occurs to me that we haven't actually made it a point to clarify who the
> PPMC members are. However, we'll need a PPMC established in order to vote
> on releases, before calling a vote on the general@incubator list for IPMC
> voting.
>
> I think the PPMC should consist of those on the initial proposal. I believe
> this makes sense, since these are the folks who were bootstrapped into the
> private@fluo mailing list.
>
> Additionally, I think it makes sense (and is simpler all around, if we
> treat PMC == committers).
>