You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@jena.apache.org by Nate Marks <np...@gmail.com> on 2014/12/14 15:31:50 UTC
Eyeball 2.3 error on ant test
I'd like to try to use eyeball as sort of a learning tool, but when I
download the eyeball 2.3 zip and run ant test, I get the following
failure.
[junit]
[junit] Testcase: warning(junit.framework.TestSuite$1): FAILED
[junit] Class
com.hp.hpl.jena.eyeball.inspectors.test.TestMoreOwlSyntaxInspector has no
public constructor TestCase(String name) or TestCase()
[junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Class
com.hp.hpl.jena.eyeball.inspectors.test.TestMoreOwlSyntaxInspector has no
public constructor TestCase(String name) or TestCase()
[junit]
[junit]
This class is different from all the others , notably because it uses
@RunWith(Parameterized.class) public class TestMoreOwlSyntaxInspector
extends InspectorTestBase
as opposed to :
@RunWith(JUnit4.class) public class TestLiteralInspector extends
InspectorTestBase
Unfortunately , I'm just learning java and can't see the problem clearly
enough to fix it.
The question is: should I just ignore it and try to use eyeball?
Thanks in advance!
Re: Eyeball 2.3 error on ant test
Posted by Nate Marks <np...@gmail.com>.
In the interest of giving a little back, this link pretty thoroughly
documents what I had to do to use eyeball
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1liigUE0VrOFEW4Nl3Ng-aBlTzsggWq2qfXuxg0gdUQY/pub
I'm really excited because the validator will let me trial and error my way
through a bunch of things I want to try. Thanks so much for your help.
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:47 AM, Nate Marks <np...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the feedback!
>
> It seems I can in fact ignore the problem and just run eyeball. I did
> have to apply a little magic using either:
> http://timhodson.com/2011/06/running-jena-eyeball-on-mac-osx/
>
> or
>
> java -cp "lib/*" jena.eyeball -check FOO
>
> Now for some validation fun!
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 14/12/14 14:31, Nate Marks wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to try to use eyeball as sort of a learning tool, but when I
>>> download the eyeball 2.3 zip and run ant test, I get the following
>>> failure.
>>>
>>
>> The last release of Eyeball was pre-Apache.
>>
>> The code is at:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/Scratch/Eyeball/trunk/
>>
>> and it is maven based. (well, it has pom.xml not build.xml!)
>>
>>
>>> [junit]
>>> [junit] Testcase: warning(junit.framework.TestSuite$1): FAILED
>>> [junit] Class
>>> com.hp.hpl.jena.eyeball.inspectors.test.TestMoreOwlSyntaxInspector has
>>> no
>>> public constructor TestCase(String name) or TestCase()
>>> [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Class
>>> com.hp.hpl.jena.eyeball.inspectors.test.TestMoreOwlSyntaxInspector has
>>> no
>>> public constructor TestCase(String name) or TestCase()
>>> [junit]
>>> [junit]
>>>
>>
>> Those look like it is being run with JUnit3 ... but the annotations style
>> is Junit4. This an ant-setup thing, I think.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> This class is different from all the others , notably because it uses
>>>
>>> @RunWith(Parameterized.class) public class TestMoreOwlSyntaxInspector
>>> extends InspectorTestBase
>>>
>>> as opposed to :
>>>
>>> @RunWith(JUnit4.class) public class TestLiteralInspector extends
>>> InspectorTestBase
>>>
>>> Unfortunately , I'm just learning java and can't see the problem clearly
>>> enough to fix it.
>>>
>>> The question is: should I just ignore it and try to use eyeball?
>>>
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> In fact, you shouldn't need to compile Eyeball at all - isn't there a
>> supplied jar file in the lib/ directory of the download?
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance!
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Eyeball 2.3 error on ant test
Posted by Nate Marks <np...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for the feedback!
It seems I can in fact ignore the problem and just run eyeball. I did
have to apply a little magic using either:
http://timhodson.com/2011/06/running-jena-eyeball-on-mac-osx/
or
java -cp "lib/*" jena.eyeball -check FOO
Now for some validation fun!
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 14/12/14 14:31, Nate Marks wrote:
>
>> I'd like to try to use eyeball as sort of a learning tool, but when I
>> download the eyeball 2.3 zip and run ant test, I get the following
>> failure.
>>
>
> The last release of Eyeball was pre-Apache.
>
> The code is at:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/Scratch/Eyeball/trunk/
>
> and it is maven based. (well, it has pom.xml not build.xml!)
>
>
>> [junit]
>> [junit] Testcase: warning(junit.framework.TestSuite$1): FAILED
>> [junit] Class
>> com.hp.hpl.jena.eyeball.inspectors.test.TestMoreOwlSyntaxInspector has no
>> public constructor TestCase(String name) or TestCase()
>> [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Class
>> com.hp.hpl.jena.eyeball.inspectors.test.TestMoreOwlSyntaxInspector has no
>> public constructor TestCase(String name) or TestCase()
>> [junit]
>> [junit]
>>
>
> Those look like it is being run with JUnit3 ... but the annotations style
> is Junit4. This an ant-setup thing, I think.
>
>
>>
>> This class is different from all the others , notably because it uses
>>
>> @RunWith(Parameterized.class) public class TestMoreOwlSyntaxInspector
>> extends InspectorTestBase
>>
>> as opposed to :
>>
>> @RunWith(JUnit4.class) public class TestLiteralInspector extends
>> InspectorTestBase
>>
>> Unfortunately , I'm just learning java and can't see the problem clearly
>> enough to fix it.
>>
>> The question is: should I just ignore it and try to use eyeball?
>>
>
> Yes.
>
> In fact, you shouldn't need to compile Eyeball at all - isn't there a
> supplied jar file in the lib/ directory of the download?
>
> Andy
>
>
>>
>> Thanks in advance!
>>
>>
>
Re: Eyeball 2.3 error on ant test
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 14/12/14 14:31, Nate Marks wrote:
> I'd like to try to use eyeball as sort of a learning tool, but when I
> download the eyeball 2.3 zip and run ant test, I get the following
> failure.
The last release of Eyeball was pre-Apache.
The code is at:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/Scratch/Eyeball/trunk/
and it is maven based. (well, it has pom.xml not build.xml!)
>
> [junit]
> [junit] Testcase: warning(junit.framework.TestSuite$1): FAILED
> [junit] Class
> com.hp.hpl.jena.eyeball.inspectors.test.TestMoreOwlSyntaxInspector has no
> public constructor TestCase(String name) or TestCase()
> [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Class
> com.hp.hpl.jena.eyeball.inspectors.test.TestMoreOwlSyntaxInspector has no
> public constructor TestCase(String name) or TestCase()
> [junit]
> [junit]
Those look like it is being run with JUnit3 ... but the annotations
style is Junit4. This an ant-setup thing, I think.
>
>
> This class is different from all the others , notably because it uses
>
> @RunWith(Parameterized.class) public class TestMoreOwlSyntaxInspector
> extends InspectorTestBase
>
> as opposed to :
>
> @RunWith(JUnit4.class) public class TestLiteralInspector extends
> InspectorTestBase
>
> Unfortunately , I'm just learning java and can't see the problem clearly
> enough to fix it.
>
> The question is: should I just ignore it and try to use eyeball?
Yes.
In fact, you shouldn't need to compile Eyeball at all - isn't there a
supplied jar file in the lib/ directory of the download?
Andy
>
>
> Thanks in advance!
>