You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by da...@soleks.com on 2013/12/19 22:13:05 UTC
Resource capacity was not updated
Hi All,
I have cloudstack 4.2 environemt - 1 advanced zone, 1 pod, 1 cluster, 2 hosts running xenserver 6.2. Initially hosts had 40Gb of RAM on board, CS was reporting that i had 74Gb available, that's true because 3Gb on each server reserved for hypervizor. Yesterday i added 8G to each host. Host statistic reflected that changes properly. I see 45Gb avaialble, but total RAM avaialable still reported as 74Gb (expecting 90).
Direct db query shows:
mysql> select id, host_id, used_capacity, total_capacity from op_host_capacity where capacity_type = 0;
+----+---------+---------------+----------------+
| id | host_id | used_capacity | total_capacity |
+----+---------+---------------+----------------+
| 26 | 14 | 18119393280 | 40045828032 |
| 28 | 15 | 17179869184 | 40045828032 |
+----+---------+---------------+----------------+
2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
Should i expect longer period of time (as for now it is less then 24 hours since additional RAM installed), or it's issue ?
Dan/borei.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Re: Resource capacity was not updated
Posted by da...@soleks.com.
Hi Nitin ,
Thanks for heads-up. Will be waiting for official release.
> That¹s a bug in 4.2 and is fixed in 4.2.1 - Refer to
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4755
>
> On 19/12/13 1:13 PM, "dan@soleks.com" <da...@soleks.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have cloudstack 4.2 environemt - 1 advanced zone, 1 pod, 1 cluster, 2
>> hosts running xenserver 6.2. Initially hosts had 40Gb of RAM on board, CS
>> was reporting that i had 74Gb available, that's true because 3Gb on each
>> server reserved for hypervizor. Yesterday i added 8G to each host. Host
>> statistic reflected that changes properly. I see 45Gb avaialble, but
>> total RAM avaialable still reported as 74Gb (expecting 90).
>>
>> Direct db query shows:
>>
>> mysql> select id, host_id, used_capacity, total_capacity from
>> op_host_capacity where capacity_type = 0;
>> +----+---------+---------------+----------------+
>> | id | host_id | used_capacity | total_capacity |
>> +----+---------+---------------+----------------+
>> | 26 | 14 | 18119393280 | 40045828032 |
>> | 28 | 15 | 17179869184 | 40045828032 |
>> +----+---------+---------------+----------------+
>> 2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
>>
>> Should i expect longer period of time (as for now it is less then 24
>> hours since additional RAM installed), or it's issue ?
>>
>> Dan/borei.
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Re: Resource capacity was not updated
Posted by Nitin Mehta <Ni...@citrix.com>.
That¹s a bug in 4.2 and is fixed in 4.2.1 - Refer to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4755
On 19/12/13 1:13 PM, "dan@soleks.com" <da...@soleks.com> wrote:
>
>
>Hi All,
>
>I have cloudstack 4.2 environemt - 1 advanced zone, 1 pod, 1 cluster, 2
>hosts running xenserver 6.2. Initially hosts had 40Gb of RAM on board, CS
>was reporting that i had 74Gb available, that's true because 3Gb on each
>server reserved for hypervizor. Yesterday i added 8G to each host. Host
>statistic reflected that changes properly. I see 45Gb avaialble, but
>total RAM avaialable still reported as 74Gb (expecting 90).
>
>Direct db query shows:
>
>mysql> select id, host_id, used_capacity, total_capacity from
>op_host_capacity where capacity_type = 0;
>+----+---------+---------------+----------------+
>| id | host_id | used_capacity | total_capacity |
>+----+---------+---------------+----------------+
>| 26 | 14 | 18119393280 | 40045828032 |
>| 28 | 15 | 17179869184 | 40045828032 |
>+----+---------+---------------+----------------+
>2 rows in set (0.00 sec)
>
>Should i expect longer period of time (as for now it is less then 24
>hours since additional RAM installed), or it's issue ?
>
>Dan/borei.
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.