You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@royale.apache.org by ap...@gmail.com on 2022/03/17 17:43:19 UTC
[DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
This is the discussion thread.
Thanks,
Yishay Weiss
RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
Posted by Maria Jose Esteve <mj...@iest.com>.
Ok, next time... 😊
Hiedra
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>
Enviado el: martes, 29 de marzo de 2022 8:49
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
Sorry, I was confused about the rules (I should have read the email I sent). It looks like 3 PMC votes are sufficient, and we do have that. I’ll announce the vote results.
From: Yishay Weiss<ma...@hotmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 9:37 AM
To: dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
Thank you Greg, Piotr, and Josh. We need one vote more to get this released. Any volunteers (especially new ones who have not done this yet)? We can guide you through it if the instructions are not clear.
From: Greg Dove<ma...@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2022 2:58 AM
To: Apache Royale Development<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
Just a couple of notes from me:
Future improvements in README
---------------------------------------------
playerglobal
I think the section on playerglobal should be re-written or removed. The links to the original Adobe download appear to be no longer working (for download). And I assume now that as Royale is generating its own playerglobal.swc (thanks to Josh) it either needs to be updated to mention that, or the section removed from README (as something that is
special-cased/noteworthy) because it is no longer relevant as an external dependency.
Air
Download links do not work for Adobe AIR (but do provide information about Harman). Should this section be updated?
Test of TourDeJewel
---------------------------
There are some minor inconsistencies between ant and maven:
While both the maven and ant builds work, the ant build is missing some runtime assets which the maven build is including (e.g. Jewel logo in top left).
Error logging observed in js dev console:
Both builds show a runtime error when selecting the 'No Submenu' menu option. This is a bug in TDJ itself, nothing to do with the SDK build. Just noting it for attention...
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:45 AM Josh Tynjala <jo...@bowlerhat.dev>
wrote:
> Hmmm... In RC4, I have now reproduced the ASDoc build issue that I
> mentioned previously, both with -Duse-flash=true and without it. Even
> without AIR_HOME being specified in the case of the JS-only build.
> However, it doesn't seem to reproduce every time. I guess that I just
> got unlucky when I was testing RC3, where it seemed to consistently
> affect the JS-only SDK. This time around, it seems to affect the
> JS+SWF SDK just as frequently on the same machine.
>
> Anyway, I agree with Alex that this issue doesn't need to block the
> release. I'm going to comment out the ASDoc example from the build,
> and if the approval script gets through everything else, I'm happy. I
> plan to vote
> +1, assuming that my remaining manual tests in VSCode and elsewhere
> +all
> look good too.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 10:43 AM <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This is the discussion thread.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yishay Weiss
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
Posted by Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
Sorry. I had a busy week. I was meaning to test the release. Thanks for getting it done!
> On Mar 29, 2022, at 9:48 AM, Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry, I was confused about the rules (I should have read the email I sent). It looks like 3 PMC votes are sufficient, and we do have that. I’ll announce the vote results.
>
>
> From: Yishay Weiss<ma...@hotmail.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 9:37 AM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
>
> Thank you Greg, Piotr, and Josh. We need one vote more to get this released. Any volunteers (especially new ones who have not done this yet)? We can guide you through it if the instructions are not clear.
>
>
>
> From: Greg Dove<ma...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2022 2:58 AM
> To: Apache Royale Development<ma...@royale.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
>
> Just a couple of notes from me:
>
> Future improvements in README
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> playerglobal
> I think the section on playerglobal should be re-written or removed. The
> links to the original Adobe download appear to be no longer working (for
> download). And I assume now that as Royale is generating its own
> playerglobal.swc (thanks to Josh) it either needs to be updated to mention
> that, or the section removed from README (as something that is
> special-cased/noteworthy) because it is no longer relevant as an external
> dependency.
>
> Air
> Download links do not work for Adobe AIR (but do provide information about
> Harman). Should this section be updated?
>
>
> Test of TourDeJewel
> ---------------------------
> There are some minor inconsistencies between ant and maven:
> While both the maven and ant builds work, the ant build is missing some
> runtime assets which the maven build is including (e.g. Jewel logo in top
> left).
> Error logging observed in js dev console:
> Both builds show a runtime error when selecting the 'No Submenu' menu
> option. This is a bug in TDJ itself, nothing to do with the SDK build. Just
> noting it for attention...
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:45 AM Josh Tynjala <jo...@bowlerhat.dev>
> wrote:
>
>> Hmmm... In RC4, I have now reproduced the ASDoc build issue that I
>> mentioned previously, both with -Duse-flash=true and without it. Even
>> without AIR_HOME being specified in the case of the JS-only build. However,
>> it doesn't seem to reproduce every time. I guess that I just got unlucky
>> when I was testing RC3, where it seemed to consistently affect the JS-only
>> SDK. This time around, it seems to affect the JS+SWF SDK just as frequently
>> on the same machine.
>>
>> Anyway, I agree with Alex that this issue doesn't need to block the
>> release. I'm going to comment out the ASDoc example from the build, and if
>> the approval script gets through everything else, I'm happy. I plan to vote
>> +1, assuming that my remaining manual tests in VSCode and elsewhere all
>> look good too.
>>
>> --
>> Josh Tynjala
>> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 10:43 AM <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This is the discussion thread.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Yishay Weiss
>>
>
RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
Posted by Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>.
Sorry, I was confused about the rules (I should have read the email I sent). It looks like 3 PMC votes are sufficient, and we do have that. I’ll announce the vote results.
From: Yishay Weiss<ma...@hotmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 9:37 AM
To: dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
Thank you Greg, Piotr, and Josh. We need one vote more to get this released. Any volunteers (especially new ones who have not done this yet)? We can guide you through it if the instructions are not clear.
From: Greg Dove<ma...@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2022 2:58 AM
To: Apache Royale Development<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
Just a couple of notes from me:
Future improvements in README
---------------------------------------------
playerglobal
I think the section on playerglobal should be re-written or removed. The
links to the original Adobe download appear to be no longer working (for
download). And I assume now that as Royale is generating its own
playerglobal.swc (thanks to Josh) it either needs to be updated to mention
that, or the section removed from README (as something that is
special-cased/noteworthy) because it is no longer relevant as an external
dependency.
Air
Download links do not work for Adobe AIR (but do provide information about
Harman). Should this section be updated?
Test of TourDeJewel
---------------------------
There are some minor inconsistencies between ant and maven:
While both the maven and ant builds work, the ant build is missing some
runtime assets which the maven build is including (e.g. Jewel logo in top
left).
Error logging observed in js dev console:
Both builds show a runtime error when selecting the 'No Submenu' menu
option. This is a bug in TDJ itself, nothing to do with the SDK build. Just
noting it for attention...
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:45 AM Josh Tynjala <jo...@bowlerhat.dev>
wrote:
> Hmmm... In RC4, I have now reproduced the ASDoc build issue that I
> mentioned previously, both with -Duse-flash=true and without it. Even
> without AIR_HOME being specified in the case of the JS-only build. However,
> it doesn't seem to reproduce every time. I guess that I just got unlucky
> when I was testing RC3, where it seemed to consistently affect the JS-only
> SDK. This time around, it seems to affect the JS+SWF SDK just as frequently
> on the same machine.
>
> Anyway, I agree with Alex that this issue doesn't need to block the
> release. I'm going to comment out the ASDoc example from the build, and if
> the approval script gets through everything else, I'm happy. I plan to vote
> +1, assuming that my remaining manual tests in VSCode and elsewhere all
> look good too.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 10:43 AM <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This is the discussion thread.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yishay Weiss
>
RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
Posted by Maria Jose Esteve <mj...@iest.com>.
Ok.
I think I will have some time today, at the end of the day, and I had thought I would look at the TDJ point Greg commented on in his post is anyone looking at it yet?
Hiedra
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>
Enviado el: martes, 29 de marzo de 2022 9:24
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
Hi Maria,
First, it would not be a bother. The more people involved, even if it takes some training, the easier it is on the rest.
I have already announced the vote, but as I have said previously I think we should aim to have a monthly release, so your next chance shouldn't be before long.
Thanks
From: Maria Jose Esteve<ma...@iest.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 10:20 AM
To: dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
I Yishay. I had not said anything because I have never done it and I did not want to bother you.
I'm going to read the documentation you passed in the first post.
OK?
Hiedra
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com> Enviado el: martes, 29 de marzo de 2022 8:37
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
Thank you Greg, Piotr, and Josh. We need one vote more to get this released. Any volunteers (especially new ones who have not done this yet)? We can guide you through it if the instructions are not clear.
From: Greg Dove<ma...@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2022 2:58 AM
To: Apache Royale Development<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
Just a couple of notes from me:
Future improvements in README
---------------------------------------------
playerglobal
I think the section on playerglobal should be re-written or removed. The links to the original Adobe download appear to be no longer working (for download). And I assume now that as Royale is generating its own playerglobal.swc (thanks to Josh) it either needs to be updated to mention that, or the section removed from README (as something that is
special-cased/noteworthy) because it is no longer relevant as an external dependency.
Air
Download links do not work for Adobe AIR (but do provide information about Harman). Should this section be updated?
Test of TourDeJewel
---------------------------
There are some minor inconsistencies between ant and maven:
While both the maven and ant builds work, the ant build is missing some runtime assets which the maven build is including (e.g. Jewel logo in top left).
Error logging observed in js dev console:
Both builds show a runtime error when selecting the 'No Submenu' menu option. This is a bug in TDJ itself, nothing to do with the SDK build. Just noting it for attention...
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:45 AM Josh Tynjala <jo...@bowlerhat.dev>
wrote:
> Hmmm... In RC4, I have now reproduced the ASDoc build issue that I
> mentioned previously, both with -Duse-flash=true and without it. Even
> without AIR_HOME being specified in the case of the JS-only build.
> However, it doesn't seem to reproduce every time. I guess that I just
> got unlucky when I was testing RC3, where it seemed to consistently
> affect the JS-only SDK. This time around, it seems to affect the
> JS+SWF SDK just as frequently on the same machine.
>
> Anyway, I agree with Alex that this issue doesn't need to block the
> release. I'm going to comment out the ASDoc example from the build,
> and if the approval script gets through everything else, I'm happy. I
> plan to vote
> +1, assuming that my remaining manual tests in VSCode and elsewhere
> +all
> look good too.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 10:43 AM <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This is the discussion thread.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yishay Weiss
>
RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
Posted by Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>.
Hi Maria,
First, it would not be a bother. The more people involved, even if it takes some training, the easier it is on the rest.
I have already announced the vote, but as I have said previously I think we should aim to have a monthly release, so your next chance shouldn’t be before long.
Thanks
From: Maria Jose Esteve<ma...@iest.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 10:20 AM
To: dev@royale.apache.org<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
I Yishay. I had not said anything because I have never done it and I did not want to bother you.
I'm going to read the documentation you passed in the first post.
OK?
Hiedra
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>
Enviado el: martes, 29 de marzo de 2022 8:37
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
Thank you Greg, Piotr, and Josh. We need one vote more to get this released. Any volunteers (especially new ones who have not done this yet)? We can guide you through it if the instructions are not clear.
From: Greg Dove<ma...@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2022 2:58 AM
To: Apache Royale Development<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
Just a couple of notes from me:
Future improvements in README
---------------------------------------------
playerglobal
I think the section on playerglobal should be re-written or removed. The links to the original Adobe download appear to be no longer working (for download). And I assume now that as Royale is generating its own playerglobal.swc (thanks to Josh) it either needs to be updated to mention that, or the section removed from README (as something that is
special-cased/noteworthy) because it is no longer relevant as an external dependency.
Air
Download links do not work for Adobe AIR (but do provide information about Harman). Should this section be updated?
Test of TourDeJewel
---------------------------
There are some minor inconsistencies between ant and maven:
While both the maven and ant builds work, the ant build is missing some runtime assets which the maven build is including (e.g. Jewel logo in top left).
Error logging observed in js dev console:
Both builds show a runtime error when selecting the 'No Submenu' menu option. This is a bug in TDJ itself, nothing to do with the SDK build. Just noting it for attention...
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:45 AM Josh Tynjala <jo...@bowlerhat.dev>
wrote:
> Hmmm... In RC4, I have now reproduced the ASDoc build issue that I
> mentioned previously, both with -Duse-flash=true and without it. Even
> without AIR_HOME being specified in the case of the JS-only build.
> However, it doesn't seem to reproduce every time. I guess that I just
> got unlucky when I was testing RC3, where it seemed to consistently
> affect the JS-only SDK. This time around, it seems to affect the
> JS+SWF SDK just as frequently on the same machine.
>
> Anyway, I agree with Alex that this issue doesn't need to block the
> release. I'm going to comment out the ASDoc example from the build,
> and if the approval script gets through everything else, I'm happy. I
> plan to vote
> +1, assuming that my remaining manual tests in VSCode and elsewhere
> +all
> look good too.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 10:43 AM <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This is the discussion thread.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yishay Weiss
>
RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
Posted by Maria Jose Esteve <mj...@iest.com>.
I Yishay. I had not said anything because I have never done it and I did not want to bother you.
I'm going to read the documentation you passed in the first post.
OK?
Hiedra
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>
Enviado el: martes, 29 de marzo de 2022 8:37
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
Thank you Greg, Piotr, and Josh. We need one vote more to get this released. Any volunteers (especially new ones who have not done this yet)? We can guide you through it if the instructions are not clear.
From: Greg Dove<ma...@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2022 2:58 AM
To: Apache Royale Development<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
Just a couple of notes from me:
Future improvements in README
---------------------------------------------
playerglobal
I think the section on playerglobal should be re-written or removed. The links to the original Adobe download appear to be no longer working (for download). And I assume now that as Royale is generating its own playerglobal.swc (thanks to Josh) it either needs to be updated to mention that, or the section removed from README (as something that is
special-cased/noteworthy) because it is no longer relevant as an external dependency.
Air
Download links do not work for Adobe AIR (but do provide information about Harman). Should this section be updated?
Test of TourDeJewel
---------------------------
There are some minor inconsistencies between ant and maven:
While both the maven and ant builds work, the ant build is missing some runtime assets which the maven build is including (e.g. Jewel logo in top left).
Error logging observed in js dev console:
Both builds show a runtime error when selecting the 'No Submenu' menu option. This is a bug in TDJ itself, nothing to do with the SDK build. Just noting it for attention...
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:45 AM Josh Tynjala <jo...@bowlerhat.dev>
wrote:
> Hmmm... In RC4, I have now reproduced the ASDoc build issue that I
> mentioned previously, both with -Duse-flash=true and without it. Even
> without AIR_HOME being specified in the case of the JS-only build.
> However, it doesn't seem to reproduce every time. I guess that I just
> got unlucky when I was testing RC3, where it seemed to consistently
> affect the JS-only SDK. This time around, it seems to affect the
> JS+SWF SDK just as frequently on the same machine.
>
> Anyway, I agree with Alex that this issue doesn't need to block the
> release. I'm going to comment out the ASDoc example from the build,
> and if the approval script gets through everything else, I'm happy. I
> plan to vote
> +1, assuming that my remaining manual tests in VSCode and elsewhere
> +all
> look good too.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 10:43 AM <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This is the discussion thread.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yishay Weiss
>
RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
Posted by Yishay Weiss <yi...@hotmail.com>.
Thank you Greg, Piotr, and Josh. We need one vote more to get this released. Any volunteers (especially new ones who have not done this yet)? We can guide you through it if the instructions are not clear.
From: Greg Dove<ma...@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2022 2:58 AM
To: Apache Royale Development<ma...@royale.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
Just a couple of notes from me:
Future improvements in README
---------------------------------------------
playerglobal
I think the section on playerglobal should be re-written or removed. The
links to the original Adobe download appear to be no longer working (for
download). And I assume now that as Royale is generating its own
playerglobal.swc (thanks to Josh) it either needs to be updated to mention
that, or the section removed from README (as something that is
special-cased/noteworthy) because it is no longer relevant as an external
dependency.
Air
Download links do not work for Adobe AIR (but do provide information about
Harman). Should this section be updated?
Test of TourDeJewel
---------------------------
There are some minor inconsistencies between ant and maven:
While both the maven and ant builds work, the ant build is missing some
runtime assets which the maven build is including (e.g. Jewel logo in top
left).
Error logging observed in js dev console:
Both builds show a runtime error when selecting the 'No Submenu' menu
option. This is a bug in TDJ itself, nothing to do with the SDK build. Just
noting it for attention...
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:45 AM Josh Tynjala <jo...@bowlerhat.dev>
wrote:
> Hmmm... In RC4, I have now reproduced the ASDoc build issue that I
> mentioned previously, both with -Duse-flash=true and without it. Even
> without AIR_HOME being specified in the case of the JS-only build. However,
> it doesn't seem to reproduce every time. I guess that I just got unlucky
> when I was testing RC3, where it seemed to consistently affect the JS-only
> SDK. This time around, it seems to affect the JS+SWF SDK just as frequently
> on the same machine.
>
> Anyway, I agree with Alex that this issue doesn't need to block the
> release. I'm going to comment out the ASDoc example from the build, and if
> the approval script gets through everything else, I'm happy. I plan to vote
> +1, assuming that my remaining manual tests in VSCode and elsewhere all
> look good too.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 10:43 AM <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This is the discussion thread.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yishay Weiss
>
RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
Posted by Maria Jose Esteve <mj...@iest.com>.
I believe I have corrected all the anomalies that Greg commented on for the TDJ.
Hiedra
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Maria Jose Esteve <mj...@iest.com>
Enviado el: miércoles, 30 de marzo de 2022 1:13
Para: dev@royale.apache.org
Asunto: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
Test of TourDeJewel
---------------------------
There are some minor inconsistencies between ant and maven:
While both the maven and ant builds work, the ant build is missing some runtime assets which the maven build is including (e.g. Jewel logo in top left).
Error logging observed in js dev console:
Both builds show a runtime error when selecting the 'No Submenu' menu option. This is a bug in TDJ itself, nothing to do with the SDK build. Just noting it for attention...
The compilation of TourDeJewel with ant does not work as expected because it is not copying the "Themes" to the target directory which causes errors accessing the various resources that are needed: Jewel logo, Theme Change and other images/icons. I will try to modify the build.xml file to include them.
At the same time, as I exposed in a previous post, the welcome page logo does not resize correctly because of the ResponsiveSize bead (it does not run a first time). I am going to upload some changes that I had in my branch and that solves the problem (if someone doesn't see them correct, please tell me)
Hiedra
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Greg Dove <gr...@gmail.com>>
Enviado el: domingo, 27 de marzo de 2022 0:58
Para: Apache Royale Development <de...@royale.apache.org>>
Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
Just a couple of notes from me:
Future improvements in README
---------------------------------------------
playerglobal
I think the section on playerglobal should be re-written or removed. The links to the original Adobe download appear to be no longer working (for download). And I assume now that as Royale is generating its own playerglobal.swc (thanks to Josh) it either needs to be updated to mention that, or the section removed from README (as something that is
special-cased/noteworthy) because it is no longer relevant as an external dependency.
Air
Download links do not work for Adobe AIR (but do provide information about Harman). Should this section be updated?
Test of TourDeJewel
---------------------------
There are some minor inconsistencies between ant and maven:
While both the maven and ant builds work, the ant build is missing some runtime assets which the maven build is including (e.g. Jewel logo in top left).
Error logging observed in js dev console:
Both builds show a runtime error when selecting the 'No Submenu' menu option. This is a bug in TDJ itself, nothing to do with the SDK build. Just noting it for attention...
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:45 AM Josh Tynjala <jo...@bowlerhat.dev>>
wrote:
> Hmmm... In RC4, I have now reproduced the ASDoc build issue that I
> mentioned previously, both with -Duse-flash=true and without it. Even
> without AIR_HOME being specified in the case of the JS-only build.
> However, it doesn't seem to reproduce every time. I guess that I just
> got unlucky when I was testing RC3, where it seemed to consistently
> affect the JS-only SDK. This time around, it seems to affect the
> JS+SWF SDK just as frequently on the same machine.
>
> Anyway, I agree with Alex that this issue doesn't need to block the
> release. I'm going to comment out the ASDoc example from the build,
> and if the approval script gets through everything else, I'm happy. I
> plan to vote
> +1, assuming that my remaining manual tests in VSCode and elsewhere
> +all
> look good too.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 10:43 AM <ap...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> > This is the discussion thread.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yishay Weiss
>
RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
Posted by Maria Jose Esteve <mj...@iest.com>.
Test of TourDeJewel
---------------------------
There are some minor inconsistencies between ant and maven:
While both the maven and ant builds work, the ant build is missing some runtime assets which the maven build is including (e.g. Jewel logo in top left).
Error logging observed in js dev console:
Both builds show a runtime error when selecting the 'No Submenu' menu option. This is a bug in TDJ itself, nothing to do with the SDK build. Just noting it for attention...
The compilation of TourDeJewel with ant does not work as expected because it is not copying the "Themes" to the target directory which causes errors accessing the various resources that are needed: Jewel logo, Theme Change and other images/icons. I will try to modify the build.xml file to include them.
At the same time, as I exposed in a previous post, the welcome page logo does not resize correctly because of the ResponsiveSize bead (it does not run a first time). I am going to upload some changes that I had in my branch and that solves the problem (if someone doesn't see them correct, please tell me)
Hiedra
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Greg Dove <gr...@gmail.com>>
Enviado el: domingo, 27 de marzo de 2022 0:58
Para: Apache Royale Development <de...@royale.apache.org>>
Asunto: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
Just a couple of notes from me:
Future improvements in README
---------------------------------------------
playerglobal
I think the section on playerglobal should be re-written or removed. The links to the original Adobe download appear to be no longer working (for download). And I assume now that as Royale is generating its own playerglobal.swc (thanks to Josh) it either needs to be updated to mention that, or the section removed from README (as something that is
special-cased/noteworthy) because it is no longer relevant as an external dependency.
Air
Download links do not work for Adobe AIR (but do provide information about Harman). Should this section be updated?
Test of TourDeJewel
---------------------------
There are some minor inconsistencies between ant and maven:
While both the maven and ant builds work, the ant build is missing some runtime assets which the maven build is including (e.g. Jewel logo in top left).
Error logging observed in js dev console:
Both builds show a runtime error when selecting the 'No Submenu' menu option. This is a bug in TDJ itself, nothing to do with the SDK build. Just noting it for attention...
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:45 AM Josh Tynjala <jo...@bowlerhat.dev>>
wrote:
> Hmmm... In RC4, I have now reproduced the ASDoc build issue that I
> mentioned previously, both with -Duse-flash=true and without it. Even
> without AIR_HOME being specified in the case of the JS-only build.
> However, it doesn't seem to reproduce every time. I guess that I just
> got unlucky when I was testing RC3, where it seemed to consistently
> affect the JS-only SDK. This time around, it seems to affect the
> JS+SWF SDK just as frequently on the same machine.
>
> Anyway, I agree with Alex that this issue doesn't need to block the
> release. I'm going to comment out the ASDoc example from the build,
> and if the approval script gets through everything else, I'm happy. I
> plan to vote
> +1, assuming that my remaining manual tests in VSCode and elsewhere
> +all
> look good too.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 10:43 AM <ap...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> > This is the discussion thread.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yishay Weiss
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
Posted by Josh Tynjala <jo...@bowlerhat.dev>.
In regards to playerglobal, version 32.0 is still available from this page,
if we still want to point out where users can download the official Adobe
version.
https://www.adobe.com/support/flashplayer/debug_downloads.html
--
Josh Tynjala
Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 4:57 PM Greg Dove <gr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just a couple of notes from me:
>
> Future improvements in README
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> playerglobal
> I think the section on playerglobal should be re-written or removed. The
> links to the original Adobe download appear to be no longer working (for
> download). And I assume now that as Royale is generating its own
> playerglobal.swc (thanks to Josh) it either needs to be updated to mention
> that, or the section removed from README (as something that is
> special-cased/noteworthy) because it is no longer relevant as an external
> dependency.
>
> Air
> Download links do not work for Adobe AIR (but do provide information about
> Harman). Should this section be updated?
>
>
> Test of TourDeJewel
> ---------------------------
> There are some minor inconsistencies between ant and maven:
> While both the maven and ant builds work, the ant build is missing some
> runtime assets which the maven build is including (e.g. Jewel logo in top
> left).
> Error logging observed in js dev console:
> Both builds show a runtime error when selecting the 'No Submenu' menu
> option. This is a bug in TDJ itself, nothing to do with the SDK build. Just
> noting it for attention...
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:45 AM Josh Tynjala <jo...@bowlerhat.dev>
> wrote:
>
> > Hmmm... In RC4, I have now reproduced the ASDoc build issue that I
> > mentioned previously, both with -Duse-flash=true and without it. Even
> > without AIR_HOME being specified in the case of the JS-only build.
> However,
> > it doesn't seem to reproduce every time. I guess that I just got unlucky
> > when I was testing RC3, where it seemed to consistently affect the
> JS-only
> > SDK. This time around, it seems to affect the JS+SWF SDK just as
> frequently
> > on the same machine.
> >
> > Anyway, I agree with Alex that this issue doesn't need to block the
> > release. I'm going to comment out the ASDoc example from the build, and
> if
> > the approval script gets through everything else, I'm happy. I plan to
> vote
> > +1, assuming that my remaining manual tests in VSCode and elsewhere all
> > look good too.
> >
> > --
> > Josh Tynjala
> > Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 10:43 AM <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This is the discussion thread.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Yishay Weiss
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
Posted by Greg Dove <gr...@gmail.com>.
Just a couple of notes from me:
Future improvements in README
---------------------------------------------
playerglobal
I think the section on playerglobal should be re-written or removed. The
links to the original Adobe download appear to be no longer working (for
download). And I assume now that as Royale is generating its own
playerglobal.swc (thanks to Josh) it either needs to be updated to mention
that, or the section removed from README (as something that is
special-cased/noteworthy) because it is no longer relevant as an external
dependency.
Air
Download links do not work for Adobe AIR (but do provide information about
Harman). Should this section be updated?
Test of TourDeJewel
---------------------------
There are some minor inconsistencies between ant and maven:
While both the maven and ant builds work, the ant build is missing some
runtime assets which the maven build is including (e.g. Jewel logo in top
left).
Error logging observed in js dev console:
Both builds show a runtime error when selecting the 'No Submenu' menu
option. This is a bug in TDJ itself, nothing to do with the SDK build. Just
noting it for attention...
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:45 AM Josh Tynjala <jo...@bowlerhat.dev>
wrote:
> Hmmm... In RC4, I have now reproduced the ASDoc build issue that I
> mentioned previously, both with -Duse-flash=true and without it. Even
> without AIR_HOME being specified in the case of the JS-only build. However,
> it doesn't seem to reproduce every time. I guess that I just got unlucky
> when I was testing RC3, where it seemed to consistently affect the JS-only
> SDK. This time around, it seems to affect the JS+SWF SDK just as frequently
> on the same machine.
>
> Anyway, I agree with Alex that this issue doesn't need to block the
> release. I'm going to comment out the ASDoc example from the build, and if
> the approval script gets through everything else, I'm happy. I plan to vote
> +1, assuming that my remaining manual tests in VSCode and elsewhere all
> look good too.
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 10:43 AM <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This is the discussion thread.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yishay Weiss
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.9 RC4
Posted by Josh Tynjala <jo...@bowlerhat.dev>.
Hmmm... In RC4, I have now reproduced the ASDoc build issue that I
mentioned previously, both with -Duse-flash=true and without it. Even
without AIR_HOME being specified in the case of the JS-only build. However,
it doesn't seem to reproduce every time. I guess that I just got unlucky
when I was testing RC3, where it seemed to consistently affect the JS-only
SDK. This time around, it seems to affect the JS+SWF SDK just as frequently
on the same machine.
Anyway, I agree with Alex that this issue doesn't need to block the
release. I'm going to comment out the ASDoc example from the build, and if
the approval script gets through everything else, I'm happy. I plan to vote
+1, assuming that my remaining manual tests in VSCode and elsewhere all
look good too.
--
Josh Tynjala
Bowler Hat LLC <https://bowlerhat.dev>
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 10:43 AM <ap...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is the discussion thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Yishay Weiss