You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@mxnet.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/12/08 12:14:43 UTC

[GitHub] [incubator-mxnet] cfRod commented on issue #20766: [Test] failure with MXNet AArch64 wheel (built with OneDNN + ACL)

cfRod commented on issue #20766:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/issues/20766#issuecomment-988759914


   >ACL not supporting training specific operators makes sense, but it should ideally default to OneDNN's reference kernels
   
   It should fallback to reference as per this implementation list https://github.com/oneapi-src/oneDNN/blob/b2cd3a8e50a715f9326a35f4c503bd11e60235a5/src/cpu/cpu_deconvolution_list.cpp#L48. Since there is no deconvolution operator implemented in ACL here.
   
   For convolution, you can see the implementations here https://github.com/oneapi-src/oneDNN/blob/b2cd3a8e50a715f9326a35f4c503bd11e60235a5/src/cpu/cpu_convolution_list.cpp#L105 guarded by CPU_INSTANCE_AARCH64_ACL.
   and within the convolution we have checks to make sure FWD phases are enabled https://github.com/oneapi-src/oneDNN/blob/b2cd3a8e50a715f9326a35f4c503bd11e60235a5/src/cpu/aarch64/acl_convolution_utils.cpp#L47
   
   Could you please check if MxNET implements deconvolution via oneDNN's deconvolution operator?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@mxnet.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@mxnet.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@mxnet.apache.org