You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by "Sharma, Ashish" <as...@hp.com> on 2011/06/17 12:20:43 UTC
Unable to understand spamassassin rule
Hi,
My spam assassin report is giving hit on following rules:
2.4 HTML_ATTACH BODY: HTML attachment to bypass scanning?
2.8 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO Reply-To/From or Reply-To/body contain different freemails
I am unable to get a suitable explanation for these rules.
Please help
Thanks
Ashish
Re: Unable to understand spamassassin rule
Posted by Joseph Brennan <br...@columbia.edu>.
--On Friday, June 17, 2011 13:52 +0100 RW <rw...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
>> 2.4 HTML_ATTACH BODY: HTML attachment to bypass scanning?
>
> html is encoded as an attached file rather than a normal html mime
> section. Some email client will display such attachments.
That, and a SpamAssassin bug/feature, that it scans only MIME part 1.
So content that would score in part 1 goes unanalyzed in part 2. Some
spamware writer seems to be aware of this.
Unfortunately we can't score much for it, because there is some legit
software that does this. Ironically three are "secure email" systems
(I know of three, anyway). A link in part 1 opens the HTML attachment
in a new window, and that links you to the secure web page with the
secure message. But anyway, an HTML attachment is still odd enough to
rate a low score.
Joseph Brennan
Columbia University Information Technology
Re: Unable to understand spamassassin rule
Posted by RW <rw...@googlemail.com>.
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:20:43 +0000
Sharma, Ashish wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My spam assassin report is giving hit on following rules:
>
> 2.4 HTML_ATTACH BODY: HTML attachment to bypass scanning?
html is encoded as an attached file rather than a normal html mime
section. Some email client will display such attachments.
> 2.8 FREEMAIL_REPLYTO Reply-To/From or Reply-To/body contain different
> freemails
It means that From is a free email address and either Reply-To or the
body contain a second free email address. Phishers and fraudsters
often do this to separate their outgoing spam from their reply
account.
> I am unable to get a suitable explanation for these rules.