You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tinkerpop.apache.org by "Marko A. Rodriguez (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/09/15 19:51:20 UTC

[jira] [Assigned] (TINKERPOP-1444) Benchmark bytecode->Traversal creation and implement GremlinServer cache if necessary.

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1444?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Marko A. Rodriguez reassigned TINKERPOP-1444:
---------------------------------------------

    Assignee: Marko A. Rodriguez

> Benchmark bytecode->Traversal creation and implement GremlinServer cache if necessary.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TINKERPOP-1444
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1444
>             Project: TinkerPop
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: benchmark, language-variant, process, server
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.2
>            Reporter: Marko A. Rodriguez
>            Assignee: Marko A. Rodriguez
>             Fix For: 3.2.3
>
>
> Right now, when you send {{Bytecode}} to GremlinServer, it will convert the bytecode to a traversal either via Java reflection (Gremlin-Java) or script engine evaluation (e.g. Gremlin-Groovy, Gremlin-Python).
> We should see how fast the process is to go from Bytecode to Traversal and if its "slow" we should create a {{Map<Bytecode,Traversal>}}-cache in GremlinServer.
> The reasons it may be "slow" are:
> 1. {{JavaTranslator}} uses Java reflection to translate bytecode to traversal and that code is a little "thick" and either should be optimized (if possible) or, instead, bytecode/traversal translations should be cached.
> 2. {{Groovy/PythonTranslator}} uses string construction to generate a script from the bytecode. While that script may be cached, it would be good if we have a cache prior to that which simply just grabs the traversal from a bytecode cache.
> I think that we will definitely want a cache as it should make things fast, but it will be good to know how much faster prior to diving into such work.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)