You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cxf.apache.org by Benson Margulies <bi...@basistech.com> on 2007/11/16 00:53:51 UTC
Soap version
Is there an annotation that specifies soap 1.1 versus 1.2 for JAX-WS
services?
RE: Soap version
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@basistech.com>.
Yes, since those are the constants, not the annotations you plug them
into :-). OK, I give up.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glen Mazza [mailto:glen.mazza@verizon.net]
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 7:45 PM
> To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Soap version
>
> OK, but you're probably going to have to read page 130 anyway.
>
> javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPBinding.SOAP11HTTP_BINDING
> javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPBinding.SOAP12HTTP_BINDING
>
> Glen
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 19:31 -0500 schrieb Benson Margulies:
> > Glen,
> >
> > Could you please have pity on me and 'name that snail' so
> that I don't
> > have to go wade through the 130 page monster just now?
> >
> > --benson
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Glen Mazza [mailto:glen.mazza@verizon.net]
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 7:27 PM
> > > To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Soap version
> > >
> > > Yes, check page 130 of the May 2007 JAX-WS 2.1 specification.
> > > I submitted a recent bug report on it--the annotations which
> > > specify MTOM at least do not presently work in CXF--you
> need to rely
> > > on a config file for MTOM instead.
> > >
> > > Glen
> > >
> > > Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 18:53 -0500 schrieb Benson
> Margulies:
> > > > Is there an annotation that specifies soap 1.1 versus 1.2
> > > for JAX-WS
> > > > services?
> > >
> > >
>
>
RE: Soap version
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@basistech.com>.
Thganks.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glen Mazza [mailto:glen.mazza@verizon.net]
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 7:48 PM
> To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Soap version
>
> Oops, that's not the snail. It's called @BindingType.
>
> Look here:
> http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/date/20071102#NWSstep6
>
> @BindingType(value=javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPBinding.SOAP11HTTP_MT
> OM_BINDING)
>
> Glen
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 19:45 -0500 schrieb Glen Mazza:
> > OK, but you're probably going to have to read page 130 anyway.
> >
> > javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPBinding.SOAP11HTTP_BINDING
> > javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPBinding.SOAP12HTTP_BINDING
> >
> > Glen
> >
> > Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 19:31 -0500 schrieb Benson Margulies:
> > > Glen,
> > >
> > > Could you please have pity on me and 'name that snail' so that I
> > > don't have to go wade through the 130 page monster just now?
> > >
> > > --benson
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Glen Mazza [mailto:glen.mazza@verizon.net]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 7:27 PM
> > > > To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
> > > > Subject: Re: Soap version
> > > >
> > > > Yes, check page 130 of the May 2007 JAX-WS 2.1 specification.
> > > > I submitted a recent bug report on it--the annotations which
> > > > specify MTOM at least do not presently work in CXF--you need to
> > > > rely on a config file for MTOM instead.
> > > >
> > > > Glen
> > > >
> > > > Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 18:53 -0500 schrieb
> Benson Margulies:
> > > > > Is there an annotation that specifies soap 1.1 versus 1.2
> > > > for JAX-WS
> > > > > services?
> > > >
> > > >
> >
>
>
RE: Soap version
Posted by Glen Mazza <gl...@verizon.net>.
Oops, that's not the snail. It's called @BindingType.
Look here:
http://www.jroller.com/gmazza/date/20071102#NWSstep6
@BindingType(value=javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPBinding.SOAP11HTTP_MTOM_BINDING)
Glen
Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 19:45 -0500 schrieb Glen Mazza:
> OK, but you're probably going to have to read page 130 anyway.
>
> javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPBinding.SOAP11HTTP_BINDING
> javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPBinding.SOAP12HTTP_BINDING
>
> Glen
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 19:31 -0500 schrieb Benson Margulies:
> > Glen,
> >
> > Could you please have pity on me and 'name that snail' so that I don't
> > have to go wade through the 130 page monster just now?
> >
> > --benson
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Glen Mazza [mailto:glen.mazza@verizon.net]
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 7:27 PM
> > > To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: Re: Soap version
> > >
> > > Yes, check page 130 of the May 2007 JAX-WS 2.1 specification.
> > > I submitted a recent bug report on it--the annotations which
> > > specify MTOM at least do not presently work in CXF--you need
> > > to rely on a config file for MTOM instead.
> > >
> > > Glen
> > >
> > > Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 18:53 -0500 schrieb Benson Margulies:
> > > > Is there an annotation that specifies soap 1.1 versus 1.2
> > > for JAX-WS
> > > > services?
> > >
> > >
>
RE: Soap version
Posted by Glen Mazza <gl...@verizon.net>.
OK, but you're probably going to have to read page 130 anyway.
javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPBinding.SOAP11HTTP_BINDING
javax.xml.ws.soap.SOAPBinding.SOAP12HTTP_BINDING
Glen
Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 19:31 -0500 schrieb Benson Margulies:
> Glen,
>
> Could you please have pity on me and 'name that snail' so that I don't
> have to go wade through the 130 page monster just now?
>
> --benson
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Glen Mazza [mailto:glen.mazza@verizon.net]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 7:27 PM
> > To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Soap version
> >
> > Yes, check page 130 of the May 2007 JAX-WS 2.1 specification.
> > I submitted a recent bug report on it--the annotations which
> > specify MTOM at least do not presently work in CXF--you need
> > to rely on a config file for MTOM instead.
> >
> > Glen
> >
> > Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 18:53 -0500 schrieb Benson Margulies:
> > > Is there an annotation that specifies soap 1.1 versus 1.2
> > for JAX-WS
> > > services?
> >
> >
RE: Soap version
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@basistech.com>.
Glen,
Could you please have pity on me and 'name that snail' so that I don't
have to go wade through the 130 page monster just now?
--benson
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glen Mazza [mailto:glen.mazza@verizon.net]
> Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 7:27 PM
> To: cxf-user@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Soap version
>
> Yes, check page 130 of the May 2007 JAX-WS 2.1 specification.
> I submitted a recent bug report on it--the annotations which
> specify MTOM at least do not presently work in CXF--you need
> to rely on a config file for MTOM instead.
>
> Glen
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 18:53 -0500 schrieb Benson Margulies:
> > Is there an annotation that specifies soap 1.1 versus 1.2
> for JAX-WS
> > services?
>
>
Re: Soap version
Posted by Glen Mazza <gl...@verizon.net>.
Yes, check page 130 of the May 2007 JAX-WS 2.1 specification. I
submitted a recent bug report on it--the annotations which specify MTOM
at least do not presently work in CXF--you need to rely on a config file
for MTOM instead.
Glen
Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 18:53 -0500 schrieb Benson Margulies:
> Is there an annotation that specifies soap 1.1 versus 1.2 for JAX-WS
> services?