You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Evgeny Stanilovsky (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2026/03/17 16:39:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-28277) Append additional tests for CacheInterceptor#onBeforePut

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-28277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Evgeny Stanilovsky updated IGNITE-28277:
----------------------------------------
    Description: CacheInterceptor#onBeforePut handles different *value* representation (BinaryObject vs raw java object) depending on *value* type (custom vs java native). It can confused and need to be documented and covered by tests. Current implementation can`t be changed without discussion cause compatibility will be broken otherwise (but probably it can because it has no actual contract through java doc or documentation as i can see).  (was: CacheInterceptor#onBeforePut process different *value* representation (BinaryObject vs raw java object) depending on *value* object (java native vs custom). It can confused and need to be documented and covered by tests. Current implementation can`t be changed without discussion cause compatibility will be broken otherwise (but probably it can because it has no actual contract through java doc or documentation as i can see).)

> Append additional tests for CacheInterceptor#onBeforePut
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-28277
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-28277
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: general
>    Affects Versions: 2.17, 2.18
>            Reporter: Evgeny Stanilovsky
>            Assignee: Evgeny Stanilovsky
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: ignite-2, ise
>
> CacheInterceptor#onBeforePut handles different *value* representation (BinaryObject vs raw java object) depending on *value* type (custom vs java native). It can confused and need to be documented and covered by tests. Current implementation can`t be changed without discussion cause compatibility will be broken otherwise (but probably it can because it has no actual contract through java doc or documentation as i can see).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)