Re: need performance info (CGI/NT) (fwd)

[Rob Hartill <ha...@ooo.lanl.gov>]

Most of you already read www-talk, but for those who don't...

> To: Tony Sanders <sa...@bsdi.com>
> Cc: www-talk@w3.org
> Subject: Re: need performance info (CGI/NT) 
> Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 17:26:29 -0500
> From: Matthew James Marnell <ma...@portia.portia.com>
> 
> :>
> :>The Apache server has an API, and you can have it for $0.  And it's
> :>one heck of a server with an open development group to boot.
> 
> Not that I like NT, but the original question was about NT,
> and I don't know if anyone has ported Apache to NT, although
> I'm sure it's possible.
> 
> :>There are also SLL versions of Apache available.
> 
> Wouldn't put too much credence in that.  Yes, there is an SSL
> version, I paid the $495 for it, but those *@#$&*@#$% over at
> VeriSign will not sign certificates for it.  The sales drone
> on the phone said they couldn't do anything with Apache until
> someone in charge of marketing at Apache called so they could
> work out the marketing details.  The funny thing is that Apacke
> is a free implementation WWW server.  It's just a bunch of
> great guys that write it in their spare time, there is no marketing
> dept.  Anyway, either VeriSign needs to smarten up, or there
> needs to be some other signing agency.  I wasn't aware until
> all this happened that VeriSign was a part of RSA, Inc.
> 
> Matt Marnell
 

Re: need performance info (CGI/NT) (fwd)

[Brian Behlendorf <br...@organic.com>]

I've responded.  Sameer may want to follow up if he reads www-talk, and 
certainly anyone should follow up if I'd made a mistake.

Also, should we actively search for NT hackers, you think?

	Brian

On Fri, 26 Jan 1996, Rob Hartill wrote:
> Most of you already read www-talk, but for those who don't...
> 
> > To: Tony Sanders <sa...@bsdi.com>
> > Cc: www-talk@w3.org
> > Subject: Re: need performance info (CGI/NT) 
> > Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 17:26:29 -0500
> > From: Matthew James Marnell <ma...@portia.portia.com>
> > 
> > :>
> > :>The Apache server has an API, and you can have it for $0.  And it's
> > :>one heck of a server with an open development group to boot.
> > 
> > Not that I like NT, but the original question was about NT,
> > and I don't know if anyone has ported Apache to NT, although
> > I'm sure it's possible.
> > 
> > :>There are also SLL versions of Apache available.
> > 
> > Wouldn't put too much credence in that.  Yes, there is an SSL
> > version, I paid the $495 for it, but those *@#$&*@#$% over at
> > VeriSign will not sign certificates for it.  The sales drone
> > on the phone said they couldn't do anything with Apache until
> > someone in charge of marketing at Apache called so they could
> > work out the marketing details.  The funny thing is that Apacke
> > is a free implementation WWW server.  It's just a bunch of
> > great guys that write it in their spare time, there is no marketing
> > dept.  Anyway, either VeriSign needs to smarten up, or there
> > needs to be some other signing agency.  I wasn't aware until
> > all this happened that VeriSign was a part of RSA, Inc.
> > 
> > Matt Marnell
>  
> 
> 

--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
brian@organic.com  brian@hyperreal.com  http://www.[hyperreal,organic].com/