You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@openoffice.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2014/04/15 14:40:37 UTC
[Issue 124691] New: Numbering shifts at 100.
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124691
Issue ID: 124691
Issue Type: DEFECT
Summary: Numbering shifts at 100.
Product: Writer
Version: 4.1.0-beta
Hardware: All
OS: Windows XP
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: formatting
Assignee: issues@openoffice.apache.org
Reporter: jteera5@hotmail.com
Created attachment 83197
--> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=83197&action=edit
Picture of problem.
When automatic numbering reaches 100, the following text shifts like a tab was
added, and the third digit (1) is aligned with the second digit of previous
line. It's back to normal at 101.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the issue.
You are watching all issue changes.
[Issue 124691] Numbering shifts at 100.
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124691
mroe <mr...@gmx.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |NOT_AN_ISSUE
--- Comment #1 from mroe <mr...@gmx.net> ---
Please activate View → Non-printing characters.
Then you will see the automatic inserted tabulator. Look at the change between
9. and 10.
If you need a bigger space so that numbers with more digits find place, you
have to change the settings in Format → Bullets and Numbering, Tab Position.
Why the line with 101. looks other than 100. can't be determined from the
picture.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the issue.
You are watching all issue changes.
[Issue 124691] Numbering shifts at 100.
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124691
--- Comment #3 from jteera5 <jt...@hotmail.com> ---
Created attachment 83199
--> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=83199&action=edit
Sample Writer document. Numbering shifts at 100-112 (or perhaps from 113 and
after)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the issue.
You are watching all issue changes.
[Issue 124691] Numbering shifts at 100.
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124691
--- Comment #2 from jteera5 <jt...@hotmail.com> ---
Created attachment 83198
--> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=83198&action=edit
Numbering shifts at 100-112 (or perhaps from 113 and after)
I'm aware of the automatic inserted tabulation, which jumps to the next tab
position due to lack of space. But it's the numbers not aligning consistenly
that causes the problem. I've attached another picture. This time the numbers
shift starts from 100 to 112. Or perhaps it starts to shift from 113.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the issue.
You are watching all issue changes.
[Issue 124691] Numbering shifts at 100.
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124691
Rainer Bielefeld <ra...@bielefeldundbuss.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rainerbielefeld_ooo_qa@biel
| |efeldundbuss.de
Resolution|NOT_AN_ISSUE |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Bielefeld <ra...@bielefeldundbuss.de> ---
The complained effect also depends on font size, Font, TrueType Number spacing
and other dependencies.
Although mroe's explication is correct, this IS an issue. The AOO Outline
Numbering is completely unusable - fortunately as any other way I know from
other software.
the current structure is
Indent - Numberstring - TAB - Text
should be:
TAB right aligned - Numberstring - TAB - Text
(even better solution: an Indent with included Decimal TAB or Right Aligned
TAB)
Things even become worse if you have multiple Numbering levels with Numbering
Type "Numeric with all Sub-Levels".
That's nothing what can be fixed easily, a completely different concept would
be required. Because of that problem this usability issue never has been fixed.
I have this concept Task in my to-do list, since 2005 or so :-/
This one is a DUP of "Issue 89568 - Outline Numbering: Text Start jumps to next
TAB position if number width exceeds space between indent and first TAB behind"
*** This issue has been marked as a duplicate of issue 89568 ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the issue.
You are watching all issue changes.