Re: [Bug 3573] [review]New regression test for SSL in spamc/spamd

[Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> I would hope that editing the t/config file would be done only in
> unusual circumstances. The regression tests should be a sanity check for
> everything that is built. The network tests are tricky, since it makes
> sense to build SpamAssassin with the ability to perform network
> functions without the build environment having the ability to run them.
> But I would look at it on a case by case basis, whether it is possible
> to run a regression test with no user inout, or if not whether it is
> less confusing to ask a question or to require editing a config file.

I'm seeing the information as a kind of site-specific policy on what tests
to run.  Most CPAN-using users don't need to run SSL tests, or LDAP/SQL
tests where explicit user setup is required; however, we as devs should be
using those.

- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD4DBQFA7yVQQTcbUG5Y7woRAoUNAJiYeiOqjXiv8WMF22REHJA/dYCuAKDVqxWX
CjYJ0amjyTzvhOJaRmnPbw==
=xjl0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----