You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@spark.apache.org by mengxr <gi...@git.apache.org> on 2014/03/17 08:23:32 UTC

[GitHub] spark pull request: Principal Component Analysis

Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/88#issuecomment-37790090
  
    @rezazadeh U, Sigma, and V are all stored in DenseMatrix format in the DenseMatrixSVD class. For tall-and-skinny PCA/SVD, U should use RDD for storage. However, Sigma and V are small. Sigma is just a double array of size k, while V is of size k x n. I don't think we should force DenseMatrix type for Sigma and V here. Maybe we can make SVD return types generic, e.g., SVD[UT, VT]. For the tall and skinny case, UT is RDD[Vector] while VT is Array[Array[Double]]. We always use Array[Double] for Sigma.
    
    Besides, I think we should mention tall and skinny clearly in the class names, e.g., TallAndSkinnySVD and TallAndSkinnyPCA.


---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastructure@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---