RE: Linux->NT->MSsqlServer

["G.Nagarajan" <gn...@dkf.de>]

Yes, the atinav driver forces you to use a single statement throughout a
transaction.
And in the freeTDS driver, the transaction is connected with the statement.

How about these type 3 drivers from Merant and others. Has anyone worked
with them?
I did not try them for two reasons. Adding another intermediate layer and
making
things complicated and to avoid one more source of possible errors.

-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Goss [mailto:mgoss@rtci.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2000 6:11 PM
To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Re: linux->NT->MSsqlServer


Ditto...
I'm also using the JTurbo 2.0 JDBC driver, and on benchmark tests against
Bea's
Weblogic JDBC driver, it came up 5 times faster!
Matt

Eric Hartmann wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I've test two drivers JDBC for Microsoft SQL Server 7 / 2000. jdbcKona
> driver from BEA (does not works with SQL 2000) and JTurbo from Ashna.
JTurbo
> 2.0 (www.jturbo.com) is a very good driver for SQL Server. It's fast and
> reliable with my tests. I didn't test it on Linux but you can download a
> test version for 30j and limited to 5 connections. It seems that JTurbo is
> more reliable than jdbcKona. But this two level 4 drivers are good however
> we choose JTurbo that seems to be faster.
>
> I hope this helps
>
> Eric
>