[jira] [Resolved] (OAK-1941) RDB: decide on table layout

["Julian Reschke (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Julian Reschke resolved OAK-1941.
---------------------------------
       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 1.2)
                   1.1.8

Marking as resolved as we currently do not plan any additional changes

> RDB: decide on table layout
> ---------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-1941
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-1941
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: rdbmk
>            Reporter: Julian Reschke
>            Assignee: Julian Reschke
>             Fix For: 1.1.8
>
>         Attachments: OAK-1941-cmodcount.diff, utf8measure.diff, with-modified-index.diff, with-modified-index.diff
>
>
> The current approach is to serialize the Document using JSON, and then to store either (a) the full JSON in a VARCHAR column, or, if that column isn't wide enough, (b) to store it in a BLOB (optionally gzipped).
> For debugging purposes, the inline VARCHAR always gets populated with the start of the JSON serialization.
> However, with Oracle we are limited to 4000 bytes (which may be way less characters due to non-ASCII overhead), so many document instances will use what was initially thought to be the exception case.
> Questions:
> 1) Do we stick with JSON or do we attempt a different serialization? It might make sense both wrt to length and performance. There might be also some code to borrow from the off-heap serialization code.
> 2) Do we get rid of the "dual" strategy, and just always use the BLOB? The indirection might make things more expensive, but then the total column width would drop considerably. -- How can we do good benchmarks on this?
> (This all assumes that we stick with a model where all code is the same between database types, except for the DDL statements; of course it's also conceivable add more vendor-specific special cases into the Java code)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)