[jira] [Created] (SOLR-11629) CloudSolrClient.Builder should accept a zk host

["Varun Thacker (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

Varun Thacker created SOLR-11629:
------------------------------------

             Summary: CloudSolrClient.Builder should accept a zk host
                 Key: SOLR-11629
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11629
             Project: Solr
          Issue Type: Bug
      Security Level: Public (Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
            Reporter: Varun Thacker


Today we need to create an empty builder and then wither pass zkHost or withSolrUrl
{code}
SolrClient solrClient = new CloudSolrClient.Builder().withZkHost("localhost:9983").build();
solrClient.request(updateRequest, "gettingstarted");
{code}

What if we have two constructors , one that accepts a zkHost and one that accepts a SolrUrl .

The advantages that I can think of are:
- It will be obvious to users that we support two mechanisms of creating a CloudSolrClient . The SolrUrl option is cool and applications don't need to know about ZooKeeper and new users will learn about this . Maybe our example's on the ref guide should use this? 
- Today people can set both zkHost and solrUrl  but CloudSolrClient can only utilize one of them

HttpClient's Builder accepts the host 
{code}
HttpSolrClient client = new HttpSolrClient.Builder("http://localhost:8983/solr").build();
client.request(updateRequest, "techproducts");
{code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org