You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com> on 2006/09/09 20:24:47 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Hello,
Please vote on releasing Apache Tobago 1.0.8.
The current nightly build should be the 1.0.8 release.
http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/
[+1] Make the 1.0.8 release of Tobago
[+0] I don't care
[-1] No... and this is why...
Current release notes
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310273&styleName=Html&version=12310900
Regards
Bernd
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Posted by Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com>.
Ok, found it
a release needs a Majority Approval [1]
[1] http://www.apache.de/foundation/glossary.html#MajorityApproval
Any of the PMC interested about voting for the 1.0.8 Tobago release?
Regards
Bernd
Bernd Bohmann wrote:
> Thanks Wendy,
>
> but I think the vote closed after 72 hours and I get 4 +1(non-binding).
>
> Is this not lasy consens [1][2]?
>
> [1] http://www.apache.de/foundation/glossary.html#LazyConsensus
> [2] http://www.apache.de/foundation/voting.html
>
> The tobago team list is:
>
> http://myfaces.apache.org/tobago/team-list.html
>
> Regards
>
>
> Bernd
>
> Wendy Smoak wrote:
>> On 9/12/06, Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com> wrote:
>>
>>> the 72 hours are ago.
>>> Here are the results of the Tobago Release Vote:
>>>
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-dev/200609.mbox/%3c4505D4A4.6040206@atanion.com%3e
>>
>>>
>>> +1 (idus, weber, lofwyr, bommel)
>>>
>>> I'll prepare everything for the release.
>>
>> According to the team list page [1], none of the votes came from PMC
>> members. I'm sure the page is out of date since idus (Arvid) and
>> lofwyr (Udo) are not even listed as committers, but it's the only list
>> I have to go by.
>>
>> Can you please re-state the vote results in terms of binding +1's from
>> PMC members and non-binding votes from other community members?
>>
>> [1] http://myfaces.apache.org/team-list.html
>>
>> Thanks!
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Posted by Grant Smith <wo...@gmail.com>.
Consider the condition removed. Binding +1.
On 9/13/06, Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for your vote,
>
> but I can't resolve the case-insensitive filesystem issue until a mayor
> release of Tobago.
>
> I think this is only a documentation issue and the documentation is
> generated by a maven-plugin. The only fast solution would be to delete
> the documentation from the distribution or write a own plugin for the
> documentation. The other solution would be to delete the deprecated tag
> but this requires a mayor release.
>
> Can you remove you condition from your vote, please.
>
> Regards
>
> Bernd
>
> Grant Smith wrote:
> > +1 for release if the case-insensitve filesystem issue is resolved...
> >
> > On 9/12/06, Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Not really.
> >>
> >> But I need a vote from 2 other pmc member.
> >>
> >> Can you encourage 2 pmc member to vote for the release.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>
> >>
> >> Bernd
> >>
> >> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> >> > too late ?
> >> >
> >> > +1
> >> > ...
> >> >
> >> > sorry for the delay, Bernd
> >> >
> >> > On 9/13/06, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> On 9/12/06, Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com> wrote:
> >> >> > Thanks Wendy,
> >> >> >
> >> >> > but I think the vote closed after 72 hours and I get 4
> >> +1(non-binding).
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Is this not lasy consens [1][2]?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > [1] http://www.apache.de/foundation/glossary.html#LazyConsensus
> >> >> > [2] http://www.apache.de/foundation/voting.html
> >> >>
> >> >> The relevant sections are:
> >> >> http://www.apache.de/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
> >> >> ... and 'Binding Votes' at the top of the page, which doesn't
> have
> >> >> an anchor.
> >> >>
> >> >> I see you found the 'majority approval' section. :) Release votes
> are
> >> >> similar to that, except that releases can't be vetoed. (I've never
> >> >> seen a release that had a -1, though... usually the release manager
> >> >> will stop the vote and fix the problem.)
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> --
> >> >> Wendy
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Grant Smith
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Posted by Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com>.
Hello,
here are the results of the Tobago Release Vote:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-dev/200609.mbox/%3c450306EF.2080202@atanion.com%3e
+1 non-binding (idus, weber, lofwyr, bommel)
+1 binding (matzew, baranda, mmarinschek, grantsmith)
I will prepare everything for the release.
I will try to fix the case-insensitive filesystem issue in the
distribution as suggested by Mike, but not in the maven aritifacts.
Thanks for pointing out this issue. I would prefer that everyone would
install a case sensitive filesystem, but this is only a wish :-)
Regards
Bernd
Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> On 9/13/06, Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com> wrote:
>> but I can't resolve the case-insensitive filesystem issue until a mayor
>> release of Tobago.
>>
>> I think this is only a documentation issue and the documentation is
>> generated by a maven-plugin. The only fast solution would be to delete
>> the documentation from the distribution or write a own plugin for the
>> documentation. The other solution would be to delete the deprecated tag
>> but this requires a mayor release.
>
> It can be far simpler than that -- just go in and delete the
> deprecated file version from the zip file distribution. The other
> problem is that the deprecated version is the only one that can be
> extracted with winzip. So extracting both files gives two copies of
> the deprecated one.
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Posted by Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com>.
On 9/13/06, Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com> wrote:
> but I can't resolve the case-insensitive filesystem issue until a mayor
> release of Tobago.
>
> I think this is only a documentation issue and the documentation is
> generated by a maven-plugin. The only fast solution would be to delete
> the documentation from the distribution or write a own plugin for the
> documentation. The other solution would be to delete the deprecated tag
> but this requires a mayor release.
It can be far simpler than that -- just go in and delete the
deprecated file version from the zip file distribution. The other
problem is that the deprecated version is the only one that can be
extracted with winzip. So extracting both files gives two copies of
the deprecated one.
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Posted by Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com>.
Thanks for your vote,
but I can't resolve the case-insensitive filesystem issue until a mayor
release of Tobago.
I think this is only a documentation issue and the documentation is
generated by a maven-plugin. The only fast solution would be to delete
the documentation from the distribution or write a own plugin for the
documentation. The other solution would be to delete the deprecated tag
but this requires a mayor release.
Can you remove you condition from your vote, please.
Regards
Bernd
Grant Smith wrote:
> +1 for release if the case-insensitve filesystem issue is resolved...
>
> On 9/12/06, Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com> wrote:
>>
>> Not really.
>>
>> But I need a vote from 2 other pmc member.
>>
>> Can you encourage 2 pmc member to vote for the release.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> Bernd
>>
>> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>> > too late ?
>> >
>> > +1
>> > ...
>> >
>> > sorry for the delay, Bernd
>> >
>> > On 9/13/06, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On 9/12/06, Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com> wrote:
>> >> > Thanks Wendy,
>> >> >
>> >> > but I think the vote closed after 72 hours and I get 4
>> +1(non-binding).
>> >> >
>> >> > Is this not lasy consens [1][2]?
>> >> >
>> >> > [1] http://www.apache.de/foundation/glossary.html#LazyConsensus
>> >> > [2] http://www.apache.de/foundation/voting.html
>> >>
>> >> The relevant sections are:
>> >> http://www.apache.de/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>> >> ... and 'Binding Votes' at the top of the page, which doesn't have
>> >> an anchor.
>> >>
>> >> I see you found the 'majority approval' section. :) Release votes are
>> >> similar to that, except that releases can't be vetoed. (I've never
>> >> seen a release that had a -1, though... usually the release manager
>> >> will stop the vote and fix the problem.)
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> --
>> >> Wendy
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Posted by Volker Weber <we...@googlemail.com>.
This is not realy a issue, the files are part of the autogenerated tlddoc.
the radiomenu.html is the description of the deprecated <tc:radiomenu>
tag which was renamed to <tc:radioMenu>.
the attributes are the same, if you compare these two pages in a
browser the only diffrence are the line:
**** Deprecated. Will be removed in a future version ****
at the top of menuradio.html.
2006/9/13, Grant Smith <wo...@gmail.com>:
> +1 for release if the case-insensitve filesystem issue is resolved...
>
>
> On 9/12/06, Bernd Bohmann <bernd.bohmann@atanion.com > wrote:
> > Not really.
> >
> > But I need a vote from 2 other pmc member.
> >
> > Can you encourage 2 pmc member to vote for the release.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> >
> > Bernd
> >
> > Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > too late ?
> > >
> > > +1
> > > ...
> > >
> > > sorry for the delay, Bernd
> > >
> > > On 9/13/06, Wendy Smoak < wsmoak@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> On 9/12/06, Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com> wrote:
> > >> > Thanks Wendy,
> > >> >
> > >> > but I think the vote closed after 72 hours and I get 4
> +1(non-binding).
> > >> >
> > >> > Is this not lasy consens [1][2]?
> > >> >
> > >> > [1]
> http://www.apache.de/foundation/glossary.html#LazyConsensus
> > >> > [2] http://www.apache.de/foundation/voting.html
> > >>
> > >> The relevant sections are:
> > >>
> http://www.apache.de/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
> > >> ... and 'Binding Votes' at the top of the page, which doesn't have
> > >> an anchor.
> > >>
> > >> I see you found the 'majority approval' section. :) Release votes are
> > >> similar to that, except that releases can't be vetoed. (I've never
> > >> seen a release that had a -1, though... usually the release manager
> > >> will stop the vote and fix the problem.)
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> --
> > >> Wendy
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Grant Smith
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Posted by Grant Smith <wo...@gmail.com>.
+1 for release if the case-insensitve filesystem issue is resolved...
On 9/12/06, Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com> wrote:
>
> Not really.
>
> But I need a vote from 2 other pmc member.
>
> Can you encourage 2 pmc member to vote for the release.
>
> Regards
>
>
> Bernd
>
> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > too late ?
> >
> > +1
> > ...
> >
> > sorry for the delay, Bernd
> >
> > On 9/13/06, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 9/12/06, Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com> wrote:
> >> > Thanks Wendy,
> >> >
> >> > but I think the vote closed after 72 hours and I get 4
> +1(non-binding).
> >> >
> >> > Is this not lasy consens [1][2]?
> >> >
> >> > [1] http://www.apache.de/foundation/glossary.html#LazyConsensus
> >> > [2] http://www.apache.de/foundation/voting.html
> >>
> >> The relevant sections are:
> >> http://www.apache.de/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
> >> ... and 'Binding Votes' at the top of the page, which doesn't have
> >> an anchor.
> >>
> >> I see you found the 'majority approval' section. :) Release votes are
> >> similar to that, except that releases can't be vetoed. (I've never
> >> seen a release that had a -1, though... usually the release manager
> >> will stop the vote and fix the problem.)
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> --
> >> Wendy
> >>
> >
> >
>
--
Grant Smith
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Posted by Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com>.
Hello Mike,
the examples are 1.5 only. A JDK 1.4 version would be produce a very big
pom. The retrotranslated version of Tobago is new in this release.
If I get more feedback from the community may be I will setup JDK 1.4
examples.
Regards
Bernd
Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> Is this intended to be a Java 1.5-only release for examples?
>
> I get this error when trying to run the examples under java 1.4.2.
>
> java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError:
> org/apache/myfaces/tobago/webapp/TobagoServletContextListener
> (Unsupported major.minor version 49.0)
>
>
> On 9/13/06, Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> you can download the tobago examples from
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/myfaces-tobago-example-1.0.8-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
>>
>>
>> the 1.0.8-SNAPSHOT is the next release
>>
>> Mike Kienenberger wrote:
>> > See this thread:
>> >
>> >
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-users/200604.mbox/%3c8f985b960604240732mcf024a7re36bac58cc755709@mail.gmail.com%3e
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On 9/13/06, L Frohman <lf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> I was wondering the same thing, why isn't Tobago being "merged" into
>> >> Tomahawk?
>> >>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:mkienenb@gmail.com]
>> >> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 8:34 AM
>> >> To: MyFaces Development
>> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
>> >>
>> >> On 9/13/06, Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >> > FWIW, this is the kind of thing that motivates "a MyFaces
>> committer is
>> >> > a MyFaces committer", as opposed to trying to segregate folks only
>> >> > interested in Tobago. On the other hand, the fact that only a small
>> >> > number of folks in the MyFaces committer community seem
>> interested in
>> >> > Tobago is a danger signal.
>> >>
>> >> I wasn't around with Tobago joined up, but my experience so far is
>> >> that it's
>> >> almost impossible to be both a Tobago and a Tomahawk user/developer.
>> >>
>> >> I can't speak for anyone else, but I don't have time to work with two
>> >> incompatible frameworks.
>> >>
>> >> I tried to start a dialog a while back on merging Tobago and Tomahawk
>> >> (or at
>> >> least making them more compatible) but nothing really came of it.
>> >>
>> >> If Tobago and Tomahawk aren't going to be made compatible with each
>> >> other, I
>> >> think perhaps that Tobago should become its own top-level project.
>> >>
>> >> Yes, there are some parts that overlap (like the proposed commons
>> jar for
>> >> non-rendering code), but not enough that I feel qualified as a PMC
>> >> member to
>> >> vote on a Tobago release.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Posted by Arvid Hülsebus <ar...@atanion.com>.
Hello,
It looks like we need to talk about what compatibility could mean for
Tobago. We are compatible to JSF since Tobago runs on top of MyFaces
and the Sun RI. We invested some time to be compatible to Facelets. Most
of the Shale stuff works with Tobago, too.
Other compatibility issues are:
- using Tobago controls on Tomahawk pages (an HTML page with Tomahawk
and standard HTML controls)
In general there are issues with renderkit ids if I remember correctly.
Tobago is not (only) a HTML renderkit. On a normal JSF page a Tobago
control is missing its layout and theme context. It should be possible
to provide this -- using a theme which fits to the rest of the page and
giving Tobago a rectangular area to layout within.
- using Tomahawk controls (or controls from other renderkits) on Tobago
pages
Again I think we have problems with different renderkit ids.
Additionally Tobago needs to know about the size of the control and
needs some means to adapt the size for layouting. And the page developer
needs to customize the CSS of the control which fits to the Tobago
theme. Making the included control respond to theme changes might be
pretty complicated.
Best regards,
Arvid
Martin Marinschek wrote:
> +1 from me for a release of Tobago.
>
> In any case - are there any new efforts to make Tobago more compatible
> to the rest of the JSF world?
>
> We've all put a bit of effort into compatibility in tomahawk and impl,
> and I'd like to see some effort in the tobago code base as well...
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 9/13/06, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Is this intended to be a Java 1.5-only release for examples?
>>
>> I get this error when trying to run the examples under java 1.4.2.
>>
>> java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError:
>> org/apache/myfaces/tobago/webapp/TobagoServletContextListener
>> (Unsupported major.minor version 49.0)
>>
>>
>> On 9/13/06, Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com> wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > you can download the tobago examples from
>> >
>> >
>> http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/myfaces-tobago-example-1.0.8-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
>>
>> >
>> > the 1.0.8-SNAPSHOT is the next release
>> >
>> > Mike Kienenberger wrote:
>> > > See this thread:
>> > >
>> > >
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-users/200604.mbox/%3c8f985b960604240732mcf024a7re36bac58cc755709@mail.gmail.com%3e
>>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 9/13/06, L Frohman <lf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> I was wondering the same thing, why isn't Tobago being "merged"
>> into
>> > >> Tomahawk?
>> > >>
>> > >> -----Original Message-----
>> > >> From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:mkienenb@gmail.com]
>> > >> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 8:34 AM
>> > >> To: MyFaces Development
>> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
>> > >>
>> > >> On 9/13/06, Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > >> > FWIW, this is the kind of thing that motivates "a MyFaces
>> committer is
>> > >> > a MyFaces committer", as opposed to trying to segregate folks
>> only
>> > >> > interested in Tobago. On the other hand, the fact that only a
>> small
>> > >> > number of folks in the MyFaces committer community seem
>> interested in
>> > >> > Tobago is a danger signal.
>> > >>
>> > >> I wasn't around with Tobago joined up, but my experience so far is
>> > >> that it's
>> > >> almost impossible to be both a Tobago and a Tomahawk
>> user/developer.
>> > >>
>> > >> I can't speak for anyone else, but I don't have time to work
>> with two
>> > >> incompatible frameworks.
>> > >>
>> > >> I tried to start a dialog a while back on merging Tobago and
>> Tomahawk
>> > >> (or at
>> > >> least making them more compatible) but nothing really came of it.
>> > >>
>> > >> If Tobago and Tomahawk aren't going to be made compatible with each
>> > >> other, I
>> > >> think perhaps that Tobago should become its own top-level project.
>> > >>
>> > >> Yes, there are some parts that overlap (like the proposed
>> commons jar for
>> > >> non-rendering code), but not enough that I feel qualified as a PMC
>> > >> member to
>> > >> vote on a Tobago release.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me for a release of Tobago.
In any case - are there any new efforts to make Tobago more compatible
to the rest of the JSF world?
We've all put a bit of effort into compatibility in tomahawk and impl,
and I'd like to see some effort in the tobago code base as well...
regards,
Martin
On 9/13/06, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is this intended to be a Java 1.5-only release for examples?
>
> I get this error when trying to run the examples under java 1.4.2.
>
> java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError:
> org/apache/myfaces/tobago/webapp/TobagoServletContextListener
> (Unsupported major.minor version 49.0)
>
>
> On 9/13/06, Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > you can download the tobago examples from
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/myfaces-tobago-example-1.0.8-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
> >
> > the 1.0.8-SNAPSHOT is the next release
> >
> > Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> > > See this thread:
> > >
> > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-users/200604.mbox/%3c8f985b960604240732mcf024a7re36bac58cc755709@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > >
> > >
> > > On 9/13/06, L Frohman <lf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> I was wondering the same thing, why isn't Tobago being "merged" into
> > >> Tomahawk?
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:mkienenb@gmail.com]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 8:34 AM
> > >> To: MyFaces Development
> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
> > >>
> > >> On 9/13/06, Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >> > FWIW, this is the kind of thing that motivates "a MyFaces committer is
> > >> > a MyFaces committer", as opposed to trying to segregate folks only
> > >> > interested in Tobago. On the other hand, the fact that only a small
> > >> > number of folks in the MyFaces committer community seem interested in
> > >> > Tobago is a danger signal.
> > >>
> > >> I wasn't around with Tobago joined up, but my experience so far is
> > >> that it's
> > >> almost impossible to be both a Tobago and a Tomahawk user/developer.
> > >>
> > >> I can't speak for anyone else, but I don't have time to work with two
> > >> incompatible frameworks.
> > >>
> > >> I tried to start a dialog a while back on merging Tobago and Tomahawk
> > >> (or at
> > >> least making them more compatible) but nothing really came of it.
> > >>
> > >> If Tobago and Tomahawk aren't going to be made compatible with each
> > >> other, I
> > >> think perhaps that Tobago should become its own top-level project.
> > >>
> > >> Yes, there are some parts that overlap (like the proposed commons jar for
> > >> non-rendering code), but not enough that I feel qualified as a PMC
> > >> member to
> > >> vote on a Tobago release.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Posted by Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com>.
Is this intended to be a Java 1.5-only release for examples?
I get this error when trying to run the examples under java 1.4.2.
java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError:
org/apache/myfaces/tobago/webapp/TobagoServletContextListener
(Unsupported major.minor version 49.0)
On 9/13/06, Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> you can download the tobago examples from
>
> http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/myfaces-tobago-example-1.0.8-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
>
> the 1.0.8-SNAPSHOT is the next release
>
> Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> > See this thread:
> >
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-users/200604.mbox/%3c8f985b960604240732mcf024a7re36bac58cc755709@mail.gmail.com%3e
> >
> >
> > On 9/13/06, L Frohman <lf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I was wondering the same thing, why isn't Tobago being "merged" into
> >> Tomahawk?
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:mkienenb@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 8:34 AM
> >> To: MyFaces Development
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
> >>
> >> On 9/13/06, Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> > FWIW, this is the kind of thing that motivates "a MyFaces committer is
> >> > a MyFaces committer", as opposed to trying to segregate folks only
> >> > interested in Tobago. On the other hand, the fact that only a small
> >> > number of folks in the MyFaces committer community seem interested in
> >> > Tobago is a danger signal.
> >>
> >> I wasn't around with Tobago joined up, but my experience so far is
> >> that it's
> >> almost impossible to be both a Tobago and a Tomahawk user/developer.
> >>
> >> I can't speak for anyone else, but I don't have time to work with two
> >> incompatible frameworks.
> >>
> >> I tried to start a dialog a while back on merging Tobago and Tomahawk
> >> (or at
> >> least making them more compatible) but nothing really came of it.
> >>
> >> If Tobago and Tomahawk aren't going to be made compatible with each
> >> other, I
> >> think perhaps that Tobago should become its own top-level project.
> >>
> >> Yes, there are some parts that overlap (like the proposed commons jar for
> >> non-rendering code), but not enough that I feel qualified as a PMC
> >> member to
> >> vote on a Tobago release.
> >>
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Posted by Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com>.
Testing this now.
One thing I noticed:
http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/myfaces-tobago-1.0.8-SNAPSHOT-bin.zip
has both menuRadio.html and menuradio.html in the same directory.
This doesn't work on case-insensitive filesystems like windows. The
two files appear to have different sizes in the zip file, and winzip
generates an overwrite warning when I attempt to unpack them.
On 9/13/06, Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> you can download the tobago examples from
>
> http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/myfaces-tobago-example-1.0.8-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
>
> the 1.0.8-SNAPSHOT is the next release
>
> Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> > See this thread:
> >
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-users/200604.mbox/%3c8f985b960604240732mcf024a7re36bac58cc755709@mail.gmail.com%3e
> >
> >
> > On 9/13/06, L Frohman <lf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I was wondering the same thing, why isn't Tobago being "merged" into
> >> Tomahawk?
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:mkienenb@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 8:34 AM
> >> To: MyFaces Development
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
> >>
> >> On 9/13/06, Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> > FWIW, this is the kind of thing that motivates "a MyFaces committer is
> >> > a MyFaces committer", as opposed to trying to segregate folks only
> >> > interested in Tobago. On the other hand, the fact that only a small
> >> > number of folks in the MyFaces committer community seem interested in
> >> > Tobago is a danger signal.
> >>
> >> I wasn't around with Tobago joined up, but my experience so far is
> >> that it's
> >> almost impossible to be both a Tobago and a Tomahawk user/developer.
> >>
> >> I can't speak for anyone else, but I don't have time to work with two
> >> incompatible frameworks.
> >>
> >> I tried to start a dialog a while back on merging Tobago and Tomahawk
> >> (or at
> >> least making them more compatible) but nothing really came of it.
> >>
> >> If Tobago and Tomahawk aren't going to be made compatible with each
> >> other, I
> >> think perhaps that Tobago should become its own top-level project.
> >>
> >> Yes, there are some parts that overlap (like the proposed commons jar for
> >> non-rendering code), but not enough that I feel qualified as a PMC
> >> member to
> >> vote on a Tobago release.
> >>
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Posted by Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com>.
Hello,
you can download the tobago examples from
http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/myfaces-tobago-example-1.0.8-SNAPSHOT-bin.tar.gz
the 1.0.8-SNAPSHOT is the next release
Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> See this thread:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-users/200604.mbox/%3c8f985b960604240732mcf024a7re36bac58cc755709@mail.gmail.com%3e
>
>
> On 9/13/06, L Frohman <lf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I was wondering the same thing, why isn't Tobago being "merged" into
>> Tomahawk?
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:mkienenb@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 8:34 AM
>> To: MyFaces Development
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
>>
>> On 9/13/06, Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > FWIW, this is the kind of thing that motivates "a MyFaces committer is
>> > a MyFaces committer", as opposed to trying to segregate folks only
>> > interested in Tobago. On the other hand, the fact that only a small
>> > number of folks in the MyFaces committer community seem interested in
>> > Tobago is a danger signal.
>>
>> I wasn't around with Tobago joined up, but my experience so far is
>> that it's
>> almost impossible to be both a Tobago and a Tomahawk user/developer.
>>
>> I can't speak for anyone else, but I don't have time to work with two
>> incompatible frameworks.
>>
>> I tried to start a dialog a while back on merging Tobago and Tomahawk
>> (or at
>> least making them more compatible) but nothing really came of it.
>>
>> If Tobago and Tomahawk aren't going to be made compatible with each
>> other, I
>> think perhaps that Tobago should become its own top-level project.
>>
>> Yes, there are some parts that overlap (like the proposed commons jar for
>> non-rendering code), but not enough that I feel qualified as a PMC
>> member to
>> vote on a Tobago release.
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Posted by Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com>.
See this thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-users/200604.mbox/%3c8f985b960604240732mcf024a7re36bac58cc755709@mail.gmail.com%3e
On 9/13/06, L Frohman <lf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was wondering the same thing, why isn't Tobago being "merged" into
> Tomahawk?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:mkienenb@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 8:34 AM
> To: MyFaces Development
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
>
> On 9/13/06, Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
> > FWIW, this is the kind of thing that motivates "a MyFaces committer is
> > a MyFaces committer", as opposed to trying to segregate folks only
> > interested in Tobago. On the other hand, the fact that only a small
> > number of folks in the MyFaces committer community seem interested in
> > Tobago is a danger signal.
>
> I wasn't around with Tobago joined up, but my experience so far is that it's
> almost impossible to be both a Tobago and a Tomahawk user/developer.
>
> I can't speak for anyone else, but I don't have time to work with two
> incompatible frameworks.
>
> I tried to start a dialog a while back on merging Tobago and Tomahawk (or at
> least making them more compatible) but nothing really came of it.
>
> If Tobago and Tomahawk aren't going to be made compatible with each other, I
> think perhaps that Tobago should become its own top-level project.
>
> Yes, there are some parts that overlap (like the proposed commons jar for
> non-rendering code), but not enough that I feel qualified as a PMC member to
> vote on a Tobago release.
>
>
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Posted by L Frohman <lf...@gmail.com>.
I was wondering the same thing, why isn't Tobago being "merged" into
Tomahawk?
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Kienenberger [mailto:mkienenb@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 8:34 AM
To: MyFaces Development
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
On 9/13/06, Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
> FWIW, this is the kind of thing that motivates "a MyFaces committer is
> a MyFaces committer", as opposed to trying to segregate folks only
> interested in Tobago. On the other hand, the fact that only a small
> number of folks in the MyFaces committer community seem interested in
> Tobago is a danger signal.
I wasn't around with Tobago joined up, but my experience so far is that it's
almost impossible to be both a Tobago and a Tomahawk user/developer.
I can't speak for anyone else, but I don't have time to work with two
incompatible frameworks.
I tried to start a dialog a while back on merging Tobago and Tomahawk (or at
least making them more compatible) but nothing really came of it.
If Tobago and Tomahawk aren't going to be made compatible with each other, I
think perhaps that Tobago should become its own top-level project.
Yes, there are some parts that overlap (like the proposed commons jar for
non-rendering code), but not enough that I feel qualified as a PMC member to
vote on a Tobago release.
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Posted by Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com>.
On 9/13/06, Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
> FWIW, this is the kind of thing that motivates "a MyFaces committer is a
> MyFaces committer", as opposed to trying to segregate folks only interested
> in Tobago. On the other hand, the fact that only a small number of folks in
> the MyFaces committer community seem interested in Tobago is a danger
> signal.
I wasn't around with Tobago joined up, but my experience so far is
that it's almost impossible to be both a Tobago and a Tomahawk
user/developer.
I can't speak for anyone else, but I don't have time to work with two
incompatible frameworks.
I tried to start a dialog a while back on merging Tobago and Tomahawk
(or at least making them more compatible) but nothing really came of
it.
If Tobago and Tomahawk aren't going to be made compatible with each
other, I think perhaps that Tobago should become its own top-level
project.
Yes, there are some parts that overlap (like the proposed commons jar
for non-rendering code), but not enough that I feel qualified as a PMC
member to vote on a Tobago release.
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Posted by Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>.
+1 for the release! Although it also concerns me a bit the lack of
knowledge/interest of most of the myfaces committers in tobago,
Cheers!
Bruno
On 9/13/06, Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 9/12/06, Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com> wrote:
> > Not really.
> >
> > But I need a vote from 2 other pmc member.
> >
> > Can you encourage 2 pmc member to vote for the release.
>
> FWIW, this is the kind of thing that motivates "a MyFaces committer is a
> MyFaces committer", as opposed to trying to segregate folks only interested
> in Tobago. On the other hand, the fact that only a small number of folks in
> the MyFaces committer community seem interested in Tobago is a danger
> signal.
>
> > Regards
> >
> >
> > Bernd
>
> Craig
>
>
> > Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > too late ?
> > >
> > > +1
> > > ...
> > >
> > > sorry for the delay, Bernd
> > >
> > > On 9/13/06, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> On 9/12/06, Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com> wrote:
> > >> > Thanks Wendy,
> > >> >
> > >> > but I think the vote closed after 72 hours and I get 4
> +1(non-binding).
> > >> >
> > >> > Is this not lasy consens [1][2]?
> > >> >
> > >> > [1]
> http://www.apache.de/foundation/glossary.html#LazyConsensus
> > >> > [2] http://www.apache.de/foundation/voting.html
> > >>
> > >> The relevant sections are:
> > >>
> http://www.apache.de/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
> > >> ... and 'Binding Votes' at the top of the page, which doesn't have
> > >> an anchor.
> > >>
> > >> I see you found the 'majority approval' section. :) Release votes are
> > >> similar to that, except that releases can't be vetoed. (I've never
> > >> seen a release that had a -1, though... usually the release manager
> > >> will stop the vote and fix the problem.)
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> --
> > >> Wendy
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Posted by Craig McClanahan <cr...@apache.org>.
On 9/12/06, Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com> wrote:
>
> Not really.
>
> But I need a vote from 2 other pmc member.
>
> Can you encourage 2 pmc member to vote for the release.
FWIW, this is the kind of thing that motivates "a MyFaces committer is a
MyFaces committer", as opposed to trying to segregate folks only interested
in Tobago. On the other hand, the fact that only a small number of folks in
the MyFaces committer community seem interested in Tobago is a danger
signal.
Regards
>
>
> Bernd
Craig
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > too late ?
> >
> > +1
> > ...
> >
> > sorry for the delay, Bernd
> >
> > On 9/13/06, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 9/12/06, Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com> wrote:
> >> > Thanks Wendy,
> >> >
> >> > but I think the vote closed after 72 hours and I get 4
> +1(non-binding).
> >> >
> >> > Is this not lasy consens [1][2]?
> >> >
> >> > [1] http://www.apache.de/foundation/glossary.html#LazyConsensus
> >> > [2] http://www.apache.de/foundation/voting.html
> >>
> >> The relevant sections are:
> >> http://www.apache.de/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
> >> ... and 'Binding Votes' at the top of the page, which doesn't have
> >> an anchor.
> >>
> >> I see you found the 'majority approval' section. :) Release votes are
> >> similar to that, except that releases can't be vetoed. (I've never
> >> seen a release that had a -1, though... usually the release manager
> >> will stop the vote and fix the problem.)
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> --
> >> Wendy
> >>
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Posted by Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com>.
Not really.
But I need a vote from 2 other pmc member.
Can you encourage 2 pmc member to vote for the release.
Regards
Bernd
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> too late ?
>
> +1
> ...
>
> sorry for the delay, Bernd
>
> On 9/13/06, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 9/12/06, Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com> wrote:
>> > Thanks Wendy,
>> >
>> > but I think the vote closed after 72 hours and I get 4 +1(non-binding).
>> >
>> > Is this not lasy consens [1][2]?
>> >
>> > [1] http://www.apache.de/foundation/glossary.html#LazyConsensus
>> > [2] http://www.apache.de/foundation/voting.html
>>
>> The relevant sections are:
>> http://www.apache.de/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>> ... and 'Binding Votes' at the top of the page, which doesn't have
>> an anchor.
>>
>> I see you found the 'majority approval' section. :) Release votes are
>> similar to that, except that releases can't be vetoed. (I've never
>> seen a release that had a -1, though... usually the release manager
>> will stop the vote and fix the problem.)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --
>> Wendy
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
too late ?
+1
...
sorry for the delay, Bernd
On 9/13/06, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/12/06, Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com> wrote:
> > Thanks Wendy,
> >
> > but I think the vote closed after 72 hours and I get 4 +1(non-binding).
> >
> > Is this not lasy consens [1][2]?
> >
> > [1] http://www.apache.de/foundation/glossary.html#LazyConsensus
> > [2] http://www.apache.de/foundation/voting.html
>
> The relevant sections are:
> http://www.apache.de/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
> ... and 'Binding Votes' at the top of the page, which doesn't have an anchor.
>
> I see you found the 'majority approval' section. :) Release votes are
> similar to that, except that releases can't be vetoed. (I've never
> seen a release that had a -1, though... usually the release manager
> will stop the vote and fix the problem.)
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Wendy
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On 9/12/06, Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com> wrote:
> Thanks Wendy,
>
> but I think the vote closed after 72 hours and I get 4 +1(non-binding).
>
> Is this not lasy consens [1][2]?
>
> [1] http://www.apache.de/foundation/glossary.html#LazyConsensus
> [2] http://www.apache.de/foundation/voting.html
The relevant sections are:
http://www.apache.de/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
... and 'Binding Votes' at the top of the page, which doesn't have an anchor.
I see you found the 'majority approval' section. :) Release votes are
similar to that, except that releases can't be vetoed. (I've never
seen a release that had a -1, though... usually the release manager
will stop the vote and fix the problem.)
Thanks,
--
Wendy
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Posted by Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com>.
Thanks Wendy,
but I think the vote closed after 72 hours and I get 4 +1(non-binding).
Is this not lasy consens [1][2]?
[1] http://www.apache.de/foundation/glossary.html#LazyConsensus
[2] http://www.apache.de/foundation/voting.html
The tobago team list is:
http://myfaces.apache.org/tobago/team-list.html
Regards
Bernd
Wendy Smoak wrote:
> On 9/12/06, Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com> wrote:
>
>> the 72 hours are ago.
>> Here are the results of the Tobago Release Vote:
>>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-dev/200609.mbox/%3c4505D4A4.6040206@atanion.com%3e
>
>>
>> +1 (idus, weber, lofwyr, bommel)
>>
>> I'll prepare everything for the release.
>
> According to the team list page [1], none of the votes came from PMC
> members. I'm sure the page is out of date since idus (Arvid) and
> lofwyr (Udo) are not even listed as committers, but it's the only list
> I have to go by.
>
> Can you please re-state the vote results in terms of binding +1's from
> PMC members and non-binding votes from other community members?
>
> [1] http://myfaces.apache.org/team-list.html
>
> Thanks!
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Posted by Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>.
On 9/12/06, Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com> wrote:
> the 72 hours are ago.
> Here are the results of the Tobago Release Vote:
>
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-dev/200609.mbox/%3c4505D4A4.6040206@atanion.com%3e
>
> +1 (idus, weber, lofwyr, bommel)
>
> I'll prepare everything for the release.
According to the team list page [1], none of the votes came from PMC
members. I'm sure the page is out of date since idus (Arvid) and
lofwyr (Udo) are not even listed as committers, but it's the only list
I have to go by.
Can you please re-state the vote results in terms of binding +1's from
PMC members and non-binding votes from other community members?
[1] http://myfaces.apache.org/team-list.html
Thanks!
--
Wendy
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Posted by Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com>.
Hello,
the 72 hours are ago.
Here are the results of the Tobago Release Vote:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/myfaces-dev/200609.mbox/%3c4505D4A4.6040206@atanion.com%3e
+1 (idus, weber, lofwyr, bommel)
I'll prepare everything for the release.
Regards
Bernd
Bernd Bohmann wrote:
> Here is my
>
> +1
>
> Regards
>
> Bernd
>
> Udo Schnurpfeil wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> my stuff works.
>>
>> Volker Weber schrieb:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> i prefer to have a branch to vote on, but the current nightly
>>> (09-Sep-2006 17:56)
>>> has my
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> to be the release version.
>>>
>>> regards
>>> Volker
>>>
>>> 2006/9/9, Arvid Hülsebus <ar...@atanion.com>:
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> Looks good -- my small test application works.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Arvid
>>>>
>>>> Bernd Bohmann wrote:
>>>> > Hello,
>>>> >
>>>> > Please vote on releasing Apache Tobago 1.0.8.
>>>> >
>>>> > The current nightly build should be the 1.0.8 release.
>>>> >
>>>> > http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/
>>>> >
>>>> > [+1] Make the 1.0.8 release of Tobago
>>>> > [+0] I don't care
>>>> > [-1] No... and this is why...
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Current release notes
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310273&styleName=Html&version=12310900
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Regards
>>>> >
>>>> > Bernd
>>>> >
>>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Posted by Bernd Bohmann <be...@atanion.com>.
Here is my
+1
Regards
Bernd
Udo Schnurpfeil wrote:
> +1
>
> my stuff works.
>
> Volker Weber schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> i prefer to have a branch to vote on, but the current nightly
>> (09-Sep-2006 17:56)
>> has my
>>
>> +1
>>
>> to be the release version.
>>
>> regards
>> Volker
>>
>> 2006/9/9, Arvid Hülsebus <ar...@atanion.com>:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Looks good -- my small test application works.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Arvid
>>>
>>> Bernd Bohmann wrote:
>>> > Hello,
>>> >
>>> > Please vote on releasing Apache Tobago 1.0.8.
>>> >
>>> > The current nightly build should be the 1.0.8 release.
>>> >
>>> > http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/
>>> >
>>> > [+1] Make the 1.0.8 release of Tobago
>>> > [+0] I don't care
>>> > [-1] No... and this is why...
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Current release notes
>>> >
>>> >
>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310273&styleName=Html&version=12310900
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Regards
>>> >
>>> > Bernd
>>> >
>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Posted by Udo Schnurpfeil <ud...@schnurpfeil.de>.
+1
my stuff works.
Volker Weber schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> i prefer to have a branch to vote on, but the current nightly
> (09-Sep-2006 17:56)
> has my
>
> +1
>
> to be the release version.
>
> regards
> Volker
>
> 2006/9/9, Arvid Hülsebus <ar...@atanion.com>:
>> +1
>>
>> Looks good -- my small test application works.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Arvid
>>
>> Bernd Bohmann wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > Please vote on releasing Apache Tobago 1.0.8.
>> >
>> > The current nightly build should be the 1.0.8 release.
>> >
>> > http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/
>> >
>> > [+1] Make the 1.0.8 release of Tobago
>> > [+0] I don't care
>> > [-1] No... and this is why...
>> >
>> >
>> > Current release notes
>> >
>> >
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310273&styleName=Html&version=12310900
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > Bernd
>> >
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Posted by Volker Weber <we...@googlemail.com>.
Hi,
i prefer to have a branch to vote on, but the current nightly
(09-Sep-2006 17:56)
has my
+1
to be the release version.
regards
Volker
2006/9/9, Arvid Hülsebus <ar...@atanion.com>:
> +1
>
> Looks good -- my small test application works.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Arvid
>
> Bernd Bohmann wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Please vote on releasing Apache Tobago 1.0.8.
> >
> > The current nightly build should be the 1.0.8 release.
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/
> >
> > [+1] Make the 1.0.8 release of Tobago
> > [+0] I don't care
> > [-1] No... and this is why...
> >
> >
> > Current release notes
> >
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310273&styleName=Html&version=12310900
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Bernd
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tobago 1.0.8
Posted by Arvid Hülsebus <ar...@atanion.com>.
+1
Looks good -- my small test application works.
Best regards,
Arvid
Bernd Bohmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache Tobago 1.0.8.
>
> The current nightly build should be the 1.0.8 release.
>
> http://people.apache.org/builds/myfaces/nightly/
>
> [+1] Make the 1.0.8 release of Tobago
> [+0] I don't care
> [-1] No... and this is why...
>
>
> Current release notes
>
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310273&styleName=Html&version=12310900
>
>
> Regards
>
> Bernd
>