You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pdfbox.apache.org by Andreas Lehmkuehler <an...@lehmi.de> on 2014/04/18 15:36:14 UTC
New PDFBox bugfix release 1.8.5
Hi,
it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes
in our queue. Additionally I already announced a possible new release in the
second quarter and people are already asking for it. ;-)
WDYT?
Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the trunk which
should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4 open issues [1]
marked with fix for 1.8.5?
BR
Andreas Lehmkühler
[1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ
Re: New PDFBox bugfix release 1.8.5
Posted by Cheng Leong <ch...@indeed.com>.
I submitted a patch in January to
PDFBOX-399<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-399> for
ignoring badly-formatted CMap ToUnicode instructions. Can this be
considered for inclusion in 1.8 series?
Apologies if I put the patch in the wrong issue.
Cheng
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:40 AM, John Hewson <jo...@jahewson.com> wrote:
> Looks good to me!
>
> -- John
>
> > On 18 Apr 2014, at 14:52, Tilman Hausherr <TH...@t-online.de> wrote:
> >
> > Am 18.04.2014 15:36, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes
> >
> > Yes!
> >
> >> WDYT?
> >> Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the
> trunk which should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4
> open issues [1] marked with fix for 1.8.5?
> >
> > PDFBOX-1946 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1946>: person
> didn't answer => set to resolve
> > PDFBOX-1977 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1977>: LZW
> bug has been resolved. However the test is still not perfect. Don't really
> know what to do, I don't have the time to create a "perfect" test, i.e.
> that would 1. include the case that failed, 2. have both types of tests,
> deterministic and non-deterministic. A possible solution would be to change
> the title to the bug only, then create a new issue re: the test for 2.0
> only. WDYT?
> > PDFBOX-2026: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2026>IMO the
> bug has been fixed. However the user didn't answer. I will set to resolve.
> > PDFBOX-1897 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1897>: I'll
> let Maruan resolve that one
> >
> > Tilman
> >
> >>
> >> BR
> >> Andreas Lehmkühler
> >>
> >> [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ
> >
>
Re: New PDFBox bugfix release 1.8.5
Posted by John Hewson <jo...@jahewson.com>.
Looks good to me!
-- John
> On 18 Apr 2014, at 14:52, Tilman Hausherr <TH...@t-online.de> wrote:
>
> Am 18.04.2014 15:36, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
>> Hi,
>>
>> it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes
>
> Yes!
>
>> WDYT?
>> Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the trunk which should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4 open issues [1] marked with fix for 1.8.5?
>
> PDFBOX-1946 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1946>: person didn't answer => set to resolve
> PDFBOX-1977 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1977>: LZW bug has been resolved. However the test is still not perfect. Don't really know what to do, I don't have the time to create a "perfect" test, i.e. that would 1. include the case that failed, 2. have both types of tests, deterministic and non-deterministic. A possible solution would be to change the title to the bug only, then create a new issue re: the test for 2.0 only. WDYT?
> PDFBOX-2026: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2026>IMO the bug has been fixed. However the user didn't answer. I will set to resolve.
> PDFBOX-1897 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1897>: I'll let Maruan resolve that one
>
> Tilman
>
>>
>> BR
>> Andreas Lehmkühler
>>
>> [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ
>
Re: New PDFBox bugfix release 1.8.5
Posted by Tilman Hausherr <TH...@t-online.de>.
Am 18.04.2014 16:13, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
> Sounds reasonable. Will you do that?
Yes will do.
Tilman
Re: New PDFBox bugfix release 1.8.5
Posted by Maruan Sahyoun <sa...@fileaffairs.de>.
Hi there,
there is an issue with my local copy of pdfbox atm - need a little more time to resolve the issue.
BR
Maruan Sahyoun
Am 18.04.2014 um 17:03 schrieb Maruan Sahyoun <sa...@fileaffairs.de>:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently on a trip so won't be able to fix it today.
>
> BR
>
> Maruan
>
>> Am 18.04.2014 um 16:58 schrieb Tilman Hausherr <TH...@t-online.de>:
>>
>> Now only Maruans issue is open. I'm currently fixing more javadoc stuff for 1.8 and 2.0 and will comment when done. This will be finished in 15 min.
>>
>> After that, two possibilities IMO:
>> - if you can also work on it tomorrow, just wait for Maruan
>> - if you can only work on it today, then set the issue to resolved after I'm done and Maruan can open a new issue.
>>
>> Tilman
>>
>> Am 18.04.2014 16:13, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Am 18.04.2014 15:52, schrieb Tilman Hausherr:
>>>> Am 18.04.2014 15:36, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes
>>>>
>>>> Yes!
>>>>
>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>> Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the trunk
>>>>> which should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4 open issues
>>>>> [1] marked with fix for 1.8.5?
>>>>
>>>> PDFBOX-1946 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1946>: person didn't
>>>> answer => set to resolve
>>> +1
>>>
>>>> PDFBOX-1977 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1977>: LZW bug has
>>>> been resolved. However the test is still not perfect. Don't really know what to
>>>> do, I don't have the time to create a "perfect" test, i.e. that would 1. include
>>>> the case that failed, 2. have both types of tests, deterministic and
>>>> non-deterministic. A possible solution would be to change the title to the bug
>>>> only, then create a new issue re: the test for 2.0 only. WDYT?
>>> Sounds reasonable. Will you do that?
>>>
>>>> PDFBOX-2026: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2026>IMO the bug has
>>>> been fixed. However the user didn't answer. I will set to resolve.
>>> +1
>>>
>>>> PDFBOX-1897 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1897>: I'll let Maruan
>>>> resolve that one
>>>>
>>>> Tilman
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> BR
>>>>> Andreas Lehmkühler
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ
>>>
>>> Thanks for the fast reply
>>>
>>> BR
>>> Andreas Lehmkühler
>>
Re: New PDFBox bugfix release 1.8.5
Posted by Maruan Sahyoun <sa...@fileaffairs.de>.
Hi,
I'm currently on a trip so won't be able to fix it today.
BR
Maruan
> Am 18.04.2014 um 16:58 schrieb Tilman Hausherr <TH...@t-online.de>:
>
> Now only Maruans issue is open. I'm currently fixing more javadoc stuff for 1.8 and 2.0 and will comment when done. This will be finished in 15 min.
>
> After that, two possibilities IMO:
> - if you can also work on it tomorrow, just wait for Maruan
> - if you can only work on it today, then set the issue to resolved after I'm done and Maruan can open a new issue.
>
> Tilman
>
> Am 18.04.2014 16:13, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 18.04.2014 15:52, schrieb Tilman Hausherr:
>>> Am 18.04.2014 15:36, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes
>>>
>>> Yes!
>>>
>>>> WDYT?
>>>> Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the trunk
>>>> which should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4 open issues
>>>> [1] marked with fix for 1.8.5?
>>>
>>> PDFBOX-1946 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1946>: person didn't
>>> answer => set to resolve
>> +1
>>
>>> PDFBOX-1977 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1977>: LZW bug has
>>> been resolved. However the test is still not perfect. Don't really know what to
>>> do, I don't have the time to create a "perfect" test, i.e. that would 1. include
>>> the case that failed, 2. have both types of tests, deterministic and
>>> non-deterministic. A possible solution would be to change the title to the bug
>>> only, then create a new issue re: the test for 2.0 only. WDYT?
>> Sounds reasonable. Will you do that?
>>
>>> PDFBOX-2026: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2026>IMO the bug has
>>> been fixed. However the user didn't answer. I will set to resolve.
>> +1
>>
>>> PDFBOX-1897 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1897>: I'll let Maruan
>>> resolve that one
>>>
>>> Tilman
>>>
>>>>
>>>> BR
>>>> Andreas Lehmkühler
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ
>>
>> Thanks for the fast reply
>>
>> BR
>> Andreas Lehmkühler
>
Re: New PDFBox bugfix release 1.8.5
Posted by Andreas Lehmkuehler <an...@lehmi.de>.
Hi,
Am 18.04.2014 16:58, schrieb Tilman Hausherr:
> Now only Maruans issue is open. I'm currently fixing more javadoc stuff for 1.8
> and 2.0 and will comment when done. This will be finished in 15 min.
>
> After that, two possibilities IMO:
> - if you can also work on it tomorrow, just wait for Maruan
> - if you can only work on it today, then set the issue to resolved after I'm
> done and Maruan can open a new issue.
IMHO we are not in a hurry here, so let's wait a couple of days to give the
other committers a chance to provide their opinion about the new release.
> Tilman
Thanks so far for handling those open issues.
BR
Andreas Lehmkühler
> Am 18.04.2014 16:13, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 18.04.2014 15:52, schrieb Tilman Hausherr:
>>> Am 18.04.2014 15:36, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes
>>>
>>> Yes!
>>>
>>>> WDYT?
>>>> Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the trunk
>>>> which should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4 open issues
>>>> [1] marked with fix for 1.8.5?
>>>
>>> PDFBOX-1946 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1946>: person didn't
>>> answer => set to resolve
>> +1
>>
>>> PDFBOX-1977 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1977>: LZW bug has
>>> been resolved. However the test is still not perfect. Don't really know what to
>>> do, I don't have the time to create a "perfect" test, i.e. that would 1. include
>>> the case that failed, 2. have both types of tests, deterministic and
>>> non-deterministic. A possible solution would be to change the title to the bug
>>> only, then create a new issue re: the test for 2.0 only. WDYT?
>> Sounds reasonable. Will you do that?
>>
>>> PDFBOX-2026: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2026>IMO the bug has
>>> been fixed. However the user didn't answer. I will set to resolve.
>> +1
>>
>>> PDFBOX-1897 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1897>: I'll let Maruan
>>> resolve that one
>>>
>>> Tilman
>>>
>>>>
>>>> BR
>>>> Andreas Lehmkühler
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ
>>
>> Thanks for the fast reply
>>
>> BR
>> Andreas Lehmkühler
>>
>
Re: New PDFBox bugfix release 1.8.5
Posted by Tilman Hausherr <TH...@t-online.de>.
Now only Maruans issue is open. I'm currently fixing more javadoc stuff
for 1.8 and 2.0 and will comment when done. This will be finished in 15 min.
After that, two possibilities IMO:
- if you can also work on it tomorrow, just wait for Maruan
- if you can only work on it today, then set the issue to resolved after
I'm done and Maruan can open a new issue.
Tilman
Am 18.04.2014 16:13, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
> Hi,
>
> Am 18.04.2014 15:52, schrieb Tilman Hausherr:
>> Am 18.04.2014 15:36, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes
>>
>> Yes!
>>
>>> WDYT?
>>> Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the
>>> trunk
>>> which should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4
>>> open issues
>>> [1] marked with fix for 1.8.5?
>>
>> PDFBOX-1946 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1946>:
>> person didn't
>> answer => set to resolve
> +1
>
>> PDFBOX-1977 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1977>: LZW
>> bug has
>> been resolved. However the test is still not perfect. Don't really
>> know what to
>> do, I don't have the time to create a "perfect" test, i.e. that would
>> 1. include
>> the case that failed, 2. have both types of tests, deterministic and
>> non-deterministic. A possible solution would be to change the title
>> to the bug
>> only, then create a new issue re: the test for 2.0 only. WDYT?
> Sounds reasonable. Will you do that?
>
>> PDFBOX-2026: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2026>IMO
>> the bug has
>> been fixed. However the user didn't answer. I will set to resolve.
> +1
>
>> PDFBOX-1897 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1897>: I'll
>> let Maruan
>> resolve that one
>>
>> Tilman
>>
>>>
>>> BR
>>> Andreas Lehmkühler
>>>
>>> [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ
>
> Thanks for the fast reply
>
> BR
> Andreas Lehmkühler
>
Re: New PDFBox bugfix release 1.8.5
Posted by Andreas Lehmkuehler <an...@lehmi.de>.
Hi,
Am 18.04.2014 15:52, schrieb Tilman Hausherr:
> Am 18.04.2014 15:36, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
>> Hi,
>>
>> it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes
>
> Yes!
>
>> WDYT?
>> Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the trunk
>> which should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4 open issues
>> [1] marked with fix for 1.8.5?
>
> PDFBOX-1946 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1946>: person didn't
> answer => set to resolve
+1
> PDFBOX-1977 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1977>: LZW bug has
> been resolved. However the test is still not perfect. Don't really know what to
> do, I don't have the time to create a "perfect" test, i.e. that would 1. include
> the case that failed, 2. have both types of tests, deterministic and
> non-deterministic. A possible solution would be to change the title to the bug
> only, then create a new issue re: the test for 2.0 only. WDYT?
Sounds reasonable. Will you do that?
> PDFBOX-2026: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2026>IMO the bug has
> been fixed. However the user didn't answer. I will set to resolve.
+1
> PDFBOX-1897 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1897>: I'll let Maruan
> resolve that one
>
> Tilman
>
>>
>> BR
>> Andreas Lehmkühler
>>
>> [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ
Thanks for the fast reply
BR
Andreas Lehmkühler
Re: New PDFBox bugfix release 1.8.5
Posted by Tilman Hausherr <TH...@t-online.de>.
Am 18.04.2014 15:36, schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler:
> Hi,
>
> it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes
Yes!
> WDYT?
> Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the
> trunk which should be merged into then branch as well? What about the
> 4 open issues [1] marked with fix for 1.8.5?
PDFBOX-1946 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1946>: person
didn't answer => set to resolve
PDFBOX-1977 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1977>: LZW bug
has been resolved. However the test is still not perfect. Don't really
know what to do, I don't have the time to create a "perfect" test, i.e.
that would 1. include the case that failed, 2. have both types of tests,
deterministic and non-deterministic. A possible solution would be to
change the title to the bug only, then create a new issue re: the test
for 2.0 only. WDYT?
PDFBOX-2026: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2026>IMO the
bug has been fixed. However the user didn't answer. I will set to resolve.
PDFBOX-1897 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-1897>: I'll
let Maruan resolve that one
Tilman
>
> BR
> Andreas Lehmkühler
>
> [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ
Re: New PDFBox bugfix release 1.8.5
Posted by Maruan Sahyoun <sa...@fileaffairs.de>.
Yes, already monitored it :-)
thanks for the patience.
BR
Maruan
> Am 26.04.2014 um 10:29 schrieb Andreas Lehmkuehler <an...@lehmi.de>:
>
> Hi Maruan,
>
> [1] everything works. Thanks!
>
> Looks like we are done here and I'm going to cut the release on Monday or Tuesday evening (UTC+2)
>
> BR
> Andreas Lehmkühler
>
> [1] https://builds.apache.org/job/PDFBox%201.8.x/122/
>
>
> Am 26.04.2014 00:07, schrieb Maruan Sahyoun:
>> Hi Andreas,
>>
>> I’ve committed the changes. Fingers crossed that I did that correctly this time.
>>
>> BR
>> Maruan
>>
>>> Am 24.04.2014 um 11:52 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler <an...@lehmi.de>:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm planning to cut the release at the beginning of the next week.
>>>
>>> Any objections?
>>>
>>> @Maruan
>>> What about your pending javadoc changes? Do you need more time or help? As we
>>> are not in a hurry, it wouldn't be a problem to postpone the release process for
>>> another week or two.
>>>
>>> BR
>>> Andreas Lehmkühler
>>>
>>>> Andreas Lehmkuehler <an...@lehmi.de> hat am 18. April 2014 um 15:36
>>>> geschrieben:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes
>>>> in our queue. Additionally I already announced a possible new release in the
>>>> second quarter and people are already asking for it. ;-)
>>>>
>>>> WDYT?
>>>> Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the trunk
>>>> which
>>>> should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4 open issues [1]
>>>> marked with fix for 1.8.5?
>>>>
>>>> BR
>>>> Andreas Lehmkühler
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ
>
Re: New PDFBox bugfix release 1.8.5
Posted by Andreas Lehmkuehler <an...@lehmi.de>.
Hi Maruan,
[1] everything works. Thanks!
Looks like we are done here and I'm going to cut the release on Monday or
Tuesday evening (UTC+2)
BR
Andreas Lehmkühler
[1] https://builds.apache.org/job/PDFBox%201.8.x/122/
Am 26.04.2014 00:07, schrieb Maruan Sahyoun:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> I’ve committed the changes. Fingers crossed that I did that correctly this time.
>
> BR
> Maruan
>
> Am 24.04.2014 um 11:52 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler <an...@lehmi.de>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm planning to cut the release at the beginning of the next week.
>>
>> Any objections?
>>
>> @Maruan
>> What about your pending javadoc changes? Do you need more time or help? As we
>> are not in a hurry, it wouldn't be a problem to postpone the release process for
>> another week or two.
>>
>> BR
>> Andreas Lehmkühler
>>
>>> Andreas Lehmkuehler <an...@lehmi.de> hat am 18. April 2014 um 15:36
>>> geschrieben:
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes
>>> in our queue. Additionally I already announced a possible new release in the
>>> second quarter and people are already asking for it. ;-)
>>>
>>> WDYT?
>>> Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the trunk
>>> which
>>> should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4 open issues [1]
>>> marked with fix for 1.8.5?
>>>
>>> BR
>>> Andreas Lehmkühler
>>>
>>> [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ
>
>
Re: New PDFBox bugfix release 1.8.5
Posted by Maruan Sahyoun <sa...@fileaffairs.de>.
Hi Andreas,
I’ve committed the changes. Fingers crossed that I did that correctly this time.
BR
Maruan
Am 24.04.2014 um 11:52 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler <an...@lehmi.de>:
> Hi,
>
> I'm planning to cut the release at the beginning of the next week.
>
> Any objections?
>
> @Maruan
> What about your pending javadoc changes? Do you need more time or help? As we
> are not in a hurry, it wouldn't be a problem to postpone the release process for
> another week or two.
>
> BR
> Andreas Lehmkühler
>
>> Andreas Lehmkuehler <an...@lehmi.de> hat am 18. April 2014 um 15:36
>> geschrieben:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes
>> in our queue. Additionally I already announced a possible new release in the
>> second quarter and people are already asking for it. ;-)
>>
>> WDYT?
>> Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the trunk
>> which
>> should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4 open issues [1]
>> marked with fix for 1.8.5?
>>
>> BR
>> Andreas Lehmkühler
>>
>> [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ
Re: New PDFBox bugfix release 1.8.5
Posted by Maruan Sahyoun <sa...@fileaffairs.de>.
Hi Andreas,
will commit them later today.
BR
Maruan Sahyoun
Am 24.04.2014 um 11:52 schrieb Andreas Lehmkühler <an...@lehmi.de>:
> Hi,
>
> I'm planning to cut the release at the beginning of the next week.
>
> Any objections?
>
> @Maruan
> What about your pending javadoc changes? Do you need more time or help? As we
> are not in a hurry, it wouldn't be a problem to postpone the release process for
> another week or two.
>
> BR
> Andreas Lehmkühler
>
>> Andreas Lehmkuehler <an...@lehmi.de> hat am 18. April 2014 um 15:36
>> geschrieben:
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes
>> in our queue. Additionally I already announced a possible new release in the
>> second quarter and people are already asking for it. ;-)
>>
>> WDYT?
>> Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the trunk
>> which
>> should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4 open issues [1]
>> marked with fix for 1.8.5?
>>
>> BR
>> Andreas Lehmkühler
>>
>> [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ
Re: New PDFBox bugfix release 1.8.5
Posted by Andreas Lehmkühler <an...@lehmi.de>.
Hi,
I'm planning to cut the release at the beginning of the next week.
Any objections?
@Maruan
What about your pending javadoc changes? Do you need more time or help? As we
are not in a hurry, it wouldn't be a problem to postpone the release process for
another week or two.
BR
Andreas Lehmkühler
> Andreas Lehmkuehler <an...@lehmi.de> hat am 18. April 2014 um 15:36
> geschrieben:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> it's time to cut a new bugfix release as there are a lot of fixes
> in our queue. Additionally I already announced a possible new release in the
> second quarter and people are already asking for it. ;-)
>
> WDYT?
> Is there anything we should wait for? Any fix only available in the trunk
> which
> should be merged into then branch as well? What about the 4 open issues [1]
> marked with fix for 1.8.5?
>
> BR
> Andreas Lehmkühler
>
> [1] http://s.apache.org/VwQ