You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Chetan Mehrotra (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/10/06 07:06:26 UTC
[jira] [Created] (OAK-3476) Memory leak caused by using marker
names based on non static session id
Chetan Mehrotra created OAK-3476:
------------------------------------
Summary: Memory leak caused by using marker names based on non static session id
Key: OAK-3476
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3476
Project: Jackrabbit Oak
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core
Reporter: Chetan Mehrotra
Assignee: Chetan Mehrotra
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 1.3.8, 1.0.22, 1.2.8
{{SessionDelegate}} creates marker based on session id. As session id is variable such markers can get accumulated over time resulting in memory leak [1]
{code}
private static <T> void logOperationDetails(ContentSession session, SessionOperation<T> ops) {
if (readOperationLogger.isTraceEnabled()
|| writeOperationLogger.isTraceEnabled()
|| auditLogger.isDebugEnabled()) {
Marker sessionMarker = MarkerFactory.getMarker(session.toString());
Logger log = ops.isUpdate() ? writeOperationLogger : readOperationLogger;
log.trace(sessionMarker, "[{}] {}", session, ops);
{code}
*Workaround*
Untill we fix it in code user should just set log level to info for following loggers
* org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.audit
* org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.operations.reads
[1] http://stackoverflow.com/q/31524084/1035417
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)