You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to ruleqa@spamassassin.apache.org by John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org> on 2018/07/03 19:38:06 UTC
Re: giovanni and llanga masschecks?
On Tue, 22 May 2018, John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2018, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
>
>> On 05/18/18 00:53, John Hardin wrote:
>> [...]
>>> Yes, but that's not clear as to whether they are pulling the wrong rev or
>>> are just late.
>>>
>>>> SVN tagged rev in nightly_mass_check: 1831759
>>>>
>>>> New masscheck submission listings in the past day:
>>>> 1831759 (Yes) - spam-axb-ham-misc.log (May 17 11:35)
>>>> 1831684 (No) - ham-giovanni.log (May 17 08:38)
>>>> 1831684 (No) - spam-llanga.log (May 17 08:45)
>>>
>> I takes half an hour to process my data and judging from those lines it
>> seems that I am sending my data 3 hours before axb@, am I wrong ?
>
> Note the source commit number in the first column. It *looks* like you're
> submitting your results about 20 hours *after* everyone else. The results
> from the *prior* masscheck are coming in about 3 hours before everybody
> else's result for the *current* masscheck.
This appears to still be happening. Can you review when your masschecks
are starting/finishing?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
...much of our country's counterterrorism security spending is not
designed to protect us from the terrorists, but instead to protect
our public officials from criticism when another attack occurs.
-- Bruce Schneier
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tomorrow: the 242nd anniversary of the Declaration of Independence
Re: giovanni and llanga masschecks?
Posted by Giovanni Bechis <gi...@paclan.it>.
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 03:45:17PM -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Jul 2018, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 06-07-18 16:13, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> >> On 07/03/18 21:38, John Hardin wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 22 May 2018, John Hardin wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Tue, 22 May 2018, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 05/18/18 00:53, John Hardin wrote:
> >>>>> [...]
> >>>>>> Yes, but that's not clear as to whether they are pulling the wrong rev or are just late.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> SVN tagged rev in nightly_mass_check: 1831759
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> New masscheck submission listings in the past day:
> >>>>>>> 1831759 (Yes) - spam-axb-ham-misc.log (May 17 11:35)
> >>>>>>> 1831684 (No) - ham-giovanni.log (May 17 08:38)
> >>>>>>> 1831684 (No) - spam-llanga.log (May 17 08:45)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> I takes half an hour to process my data and judging from those lines it seems that I am sending my data 3 hours before axb@, am I wrong ?
> >>>>
> >>>> Note the source commit number in the first column. It *looks* like you're submitting your results about 20 hours *after* everyone else. The results from the *prior* masscheck are coming in about 3 hours before everybody else's result for the *current* masscheck.
> >>>
> >>> This appears to still be happening. Can you review when your masschecks are starting/finishing?
> >>>
> >>>
> >> It starts at 8:15 UTC and finishes before 8:30 UTC.
> >> Yesterday's run seems to have worked.
> >> Giovanni
> >>
> >
> > That is the wrong schedule, as new data is pushed out at 9:00 UTC each
> > day. At 8:30 UTC you're processing 23h old data, which is exactly the
> > problem in this thread. Could you change the schedule to 9:30 UTC?
>
> Ok, Giovanni's submissions for the past three masschecks look good, I
> expect that was the missing bit (if you made that change).
>
I posponed the scheduled masscheck, now it starts around 9:30 UTC.
Cheers
Giovanni
> llanga still looks odd. There appear to be *two* submissions, one
> off-schedule and one on. As I compose this, the "on-schedule" submission
> for the current masscheck isn't present, but the "on-schedule" one for the
> previous masscheck is present.
>
> llanga, could you check your masscheck schedule(s) and runtime(s)?
>
>
>
> --
> John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
> jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
> key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Back in 1969 the technology to fake a Moon landing didn't exist,
> but the technology to actually land there did.
> Today, it is the opposite. -- unknown
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 9 days until the 49th anniversary of Apollo 11 landing on the Moon
Re: giovanni and llanga masschecks?
Posted by John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org>.
On Fri, 6 Jul 2018, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
>
>
> On 06-07-18 16:13, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
>> On 07/03/18 21:38, John Hardin wrote:
>>> On Tue, 22 May 2018, John Hardin wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 22 May 2018, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 05/18/18 00:53, John Hardin wrote:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>> Yes, but that's not clear as to whether they are pulling the wrong rev or are just late.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> SVN tagged rev in nightly_mass_check: 1831759
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> New masscheck submission listings in the past day:
>>>>>>> 1831759 (Yes) - spam-axb-ham-misc.log (May 17 11:35)
>>>>>>> 1831684 (No) - ham-giovanni.log (May 17 08:38)
>>>>>>> 1831684 (No) - spam-llanga.log (May 17 08:45)
>>>>>>
>>>>> I takes half an hour to process my data and judging from those lines it seems that I am sending my data 3 hours before axb@, am I wrong ?
>>>>
>>>> Note the source commit number in the first column. It *looks* like you're submitting your results about 20 hours *after* everyone else. The results from the *prior* masscheck are coming in about 3 hours before everybody else's result for the *current* masscheck.
>>>
>>> This appears to still be happening. Can you review when your masschecks are starting/finishing?
>>>
>>>
>> It starts at 8:15 UTC and finishes before 8:30 UTC.
>> Yesterday's run seems to have worked.
>> Giovanni
>>
>
> That is the wrong schedule, as new data is pushed out at 9:00 UTC each
> day. At 8:30 UTC you're processing 23h old data, which is exactly the
> problem in this thread. Could you change the schedule to 9:30 UTC?
Ok, Giovanni's submissions for the past three masschecks look good, I
expect that was the missing bit (if you made that change).
llanga still looks odd. There appear to be *two* submissions, one
off-schedule and one on. As I compose this, the "on-schedule" submission
for the current masscheck isn't present, but the "on-schedule" one for the
previous masscheck is present.
llanga, could you check your masscheck schedule(s) and runtime(s)?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhardin@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Back in 1969 the technology to fake a Moon landing didn't exist,
but the technology to actually land there did.
Today, it is the opposite. -- unknown
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
9 days until the 49th anniversary of Apollo 11 landing on the Moon
Re: giovanni and llanga masschecks?
Posted by Tom Hendrikx <to...@whyscream.net>.
On 06-07-18 16:13, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
> On 07/03/18 21:38, John Hardin wrote:
>> On Tue, 22 May 2018, John Hardin wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 22 May 2018, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 05/18/18 00:53, John Hardin wrote:
>>>> [...]
>>>>> Yes, but that's not clear as to whether they are pulling the wrong rev or are just late.
>>>>>
>>>>>> SVN tagged rev in nightly_mass_check: 1831759
>>>>>>
>>>>>> New masscheck submission listings in the past day:
>>>>>> 1831759 (Yes) - spam-axb-ham-misc.log (May 17 11:35)
>>>>>> 1831684 (No) - ham-giovanni.log (May 17 08:38)
>>>>>> 1831684 (No) - spam-llanga.log (May 17 08:45)
>>>>>
>>>> I takes half an hour to process my data and judging from those lines it seems that I am sending my data 3 hours before axb@, am I wrong ?
>>>
>>> Note the source commit number in the first column. It *looks* like you're submitting your results about 20 hours *after* everyone else. The results from the *prior* masscheck are coming in about 3 hours before everybody else's result for the *current* masscheck.
>>
>> This appears to still be happening. Can you review when your masschecks are starting/finishing?
>>
>>
> It starts at 8:15 UTC and finishes before 8:30 UTC.
> Yesterday's run seems to have worked.
> Giovanni
>
That is the wrong schedule, as new data is pushed out at 9:00 UTC each
day. At 8:30 UTC you're processing 23h old data, which is exactly the
problem in this thread. Could you change the schedule to 9:30 UTC?
Kind regards,
Tom
Re: giovanni and llanga masschecks?
Posted by Giovanni Bechis <gi...@paclan.it>.
On 07/03/18 21:38, John Hardin wrote:
> On Tue, 22 May 2018, John Hardin wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 22 May 2018, Giovanni Bechis wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/18/18 00:53, John Hardin wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>> Yes, but that's not clear as to whether they are pulling the wrong rev or are just late.
>>>>
>>>>> SVN tagged rev in nightly_mass_check: 1831759
>>>>>
>>>>> New masscheck submission listings in the past day:
>>>>> 1831759 (Yes) - spam-axb-ham-misc.log (May 17 11:35)
>>>>> 1831684 (No) - ham-giovanni.log (May 17 08:38)
>>>>> 1831684 (No) - spam-llanga.log (May 17 08:45)
>>>>
>>> I takes half an hour to process my data and judging from those lines it seems that I am sending my data 3 hours before axb@, am I wrong ?
>>
>> Note the source commit number in the first column. It *looks* like you're submitting your results about 20 hours *after* everyone else. The results from the *prior* masscheck are coming in about 3 hours before everybody else's result for the *current* masscheck.
>
> This appears to still be happening. Can you review when your masschecks are starting/finishing?
>
>
It starts at 8:15 UTC and finishes before 8:30 UTC.
Yesterday's run seems to have worked.
Giovanni