[PATCH] for Derby-38 (Make LOCKS as non-reserved keyword in Derby since it is not a reserved keyword in the SQL standards)

[Mamta Satoor <ma...@Remulak.Net>]

Hi,

This patch is to make LOCKS an non-reserved keyword to match the SQL
standards.

thanks,
Mamta

Index: java/engine/org/apache/derby/impl/sql/compile/sqlgrammar.jj
===================================================================
--- java/engine/org/apache/derby/impl/sql/compile/sqlgrammar.jj
(revision 54108)

+++ java/engine/org/apache/derby/impl/sql/compile/sqlgrammar.jj (working
copy)
@@ -1822,6 +1822,7 @@
 |      <LARGE: "large">
 |      <LENGTH: "length">
 |      <LEVEL: "level">
+|      <LOCKS: "locks">
 |      <LOCKSIZE: "locksize">
 |      <LOGGED: "logged">
 |       <MOD: "mod">
@@ -1903,7 +1904,6 @@
 |   <LCASE: "lcase">
 |   <LOCATE: "locate">
 |      <LOCK: "lock">
-|      <LOCKS: "locks">
 |      <MESSAGE_LOCALE: "message_locale">
 |      <METHOD: "method">
 |      <MODE: "mode">
@@ -11351,6 +11351,7 @@
        |       tok = <LEVEL>
     |   tok = <LOCATE>
        |       tok = <LOCK>
+       |       tok = <LOCKS>
        |       tok = <LOCKSIZE>
        |       tok = <LOGGED>
        |       tok = <LONG>

Re: [PATCH] for Derby-38 (Make LOCKS as non-reserved keyword in Derby since it is not a reserved keyword in the SQL standards)

[Daniel John Debrunner <dj...@debrunners.com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Mamta Satoor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch is to make LOCKS an non-reserved keyword to match the SQL
> standards.

Can you please re-submit the patch as an attachment, I could not get the
patch to be applied.

Thanks,
Dan.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFBbBxQIv0S4qsbfuQRAvR7AKDBBo8fNX/u5wrbxTBfplPdGy/vogCffqBO
BRbXCjKYBBc0G0PQn3aEvSs=
=3U25
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----