Re: Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-390

[Joe Brockmeier <jz...@zonker.net>]

> On Oct. 31, 2012, 11:10 p.m., Joe Brockmeier wrote:
> > Hi Radhika, 
> > 
> > A couple of things:
> > 
> > - In the bug for this, (CLOUDSTACK-390) Chip asked whether there's an option to provide a locally built version of the System VM. Is this possible? The patch doesn't address that.
> > - "If you are using a separate NFS server, perform this step." Which step? I'm unclear which step I should or shouldn't perform. Is this unmounting the NFS server? 
> > - Does the cloud-install-sys-tmplt script mount NFS for the user? 
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > Joe
> 
> Radhika PC wrote:
>     Thank you Joe. I will look into his.

Any progress on this one? 


- Joe


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7802/#review12975
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 31, 2012, 6:36 a.m., Radhika PC wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/7802/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 31, 2012, 6:36 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, David Nalley, Chip Childers, and Jessica Tomechak.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added a note that Citrix is providing necessary binary package of the system VM.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug CLOUDSTACK-390.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/en-US/prepare-system-vm-template.xml 5ed78f7 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7802/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> patch cleanly applies.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Radhika PC
> 
>