You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucenenet.apache.org by Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com> on 2011/11/02 22:24:53 UTC
[Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubator-RC2 Release
Alright vote take 2. Thanks to everyone who helped me get all the pieces in order:
Artifacts are located here: http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC2/
/lib was left out of the src files because I think we are unclear if we can do that per licensing
/docs was left out because of the size.
The ReadME file includes locations to download both the lib, and the location of the online documentation as well as the download to the .CHM
Standard voting rules: open 72 hours (unless this gets shot down quicker like RC1), +1 / 0 / -1
~Prescott
Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubator-RC2 Release
Posted by Christopher Currens <cu...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Michael Herndon <mherndon@wickedsoftware.net
> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > On 2011-11-02, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> >
> > > http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC2/
> >
> > As usual, no technical opinion at all, I leave that to others.
> >
> > Sigs and hashes look good. NOTICE and LICENSE are fine.
> >
> > RAT is almost happy, we should add license headers to
> >
> src/contrib/DistributedSearch/LuceneMonitorSetup/LuceneMonitorSetup.vdproj
> > and test/contrib/SpellChecker/Contrib.SpellChecker.Test.nunit but these
> > are not blockers to me. Two files is not the same as 120 files.
> >
> > Source distribution and
> >
> >
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/tags/Lucene.Net_2_9_4_RC2/
> > don't match exactly, the READMEs are different. The one of the source
> > distribution says .NET 3.5, the one of the tag says 2.0. No biggy but
> > you should adjust the tag IMHO.
> >
> > Wearing my IPMC heat I don't see any reason to block the release, so +1
> > from me.
> >
> > Stefan
> >
>
Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubator-RC2 Release
Posted by Michael Herndon <mh...@wickedsoftware.net>.
+1
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 2011-11-02, Prescott Nasser wrote:
>
> > http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC2/
>
> As usual, no technical opinion at all, I leave that to others.
>
> Sigs and hashes look good. NOTICE and LICENSE are fine.
>
> RAT is almost happy, we should add license headers to
> src/contrib/DistributedSearch/LuceneMonitorSetup/LuceneMonitorSetup.vdproj
> and test/contrib/SpellChecker/Contrib.SpellChecker.Test.nunit but these
> are not blockers to me. Two files is not the same as 120 files.
>
> Source distribution and
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/tags/Lucene.Net_2_9_4_RC2/
> don't match exactly, the READMEs are different. The one of the source
> distribution says .NET 3.5, the one of the tag says 2.0. No biggy but
> you should adjust the tag IMHO.
>
> Wearing my IPMC heat I don't see any reason to block the release, so +1
> from me.
>
> Stefan
>
Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubator-RC2 Release
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On 2011-11-02, Prescott Nasser wrote:
> http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC2/
As usual, no technical opinion at all, I leave that to others.
Sigs and hashes look good. NOTICE and LICENSE are fine.
RAT is almost happy, we should add license headers to
src/contrib/DistributedSearch/LuceneMonitorSetup/LuceneMonitorSetup.vdproj
and test/contrib/SpellChecker/Contrib.SpellChecker.Test.nunit but these
are not blockers to me. Two files is not the same as 120 files.
Source distribution and
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/tags/Lucene.Net_2_9_4_RC2/
don't match exactly, the READMEs are different. The one of the source
distribution says .NET 3.5, the one of the tag says 2.0. No biggy but
you should adjust the tag IMHO.
Wearing my IPMC heat I don't see any reason to block the release, so +1
from me.
Stefan