You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ignite.apache.org by Pavel Tupitsyn <pt...@apache.org> on 2016/11/16 10:08:55 UTC
[VOTE] Use Upsource for Code Review
Following the discussion on Upsource [1],
I would like to call a vote on accepting it as our official code review
tool.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
This vote will go on for 5 days.
[1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
com/Code-Review-Tool-Proposal-Upsource-td12195.html
Re: [VOTE] Use Upsource for Code Review
Posted by Pavel Tupitsyn <pt...@apache.org>.
Cos, I also thought this falls under a procedural vote when starting this.
6 days have passed, vote is closed.
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Igor Rudyak <ir...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Nov 16, 2016 9:15 AM, "Denis Magda" <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > —
> > Denis
> >
> > > On Nov 16, 2016, at 2:08 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <pt...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Following the discussion on Upsource [1],
> > > I would like to call a vote on accepting it as our official code review
> > > tool.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > >
> > > This vote will go on for 5 days.
> > >
> > > [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > com/Code-Review-Tool-Proposal-Upsource-td12195.html
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Use Upsource for Code Review
Posted by Igor Rudyak <ir...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Nov 16, 2016 9:15 AM, "Denis Magda" <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> —
> Denis
>
> > On Nov 16, 2016, at 2:08 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <pt...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Following the discussion on Upsource [1],
> > I would like to call a vote on accepting it as our official code review
> > tool.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > This vote will go on for 5 days.
> >
> > [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > com/Code-Review-Tool-Proposal-Upsource-td12195.html
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Use Upsource for Code Review
Posted by Nikolai Tikhonov <nt...@apache.org>.
+1
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Vladisav Jelisavcic <vl...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 6:15 PM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > —
> > Denis
> >
> > > On Nov 16, 2016, at 2:08 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <pt...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Following the discussion on Upsource [1],
> > > I would like to call a vote on accepting it as our official code review
> > > tool.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > >
> > > This vote will go on for 5 days.
> > >
> > > [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > com/Code-Review-Tool-Proposal-Upsource-td12195.html
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Use Upsource for Code Review
Posted by Vladisav Jelisavcic <vl...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 6:15 PM, Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> —
> Denis
>
> > On Nov 16, 2016, at 2:08 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <pt...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Following the discussion on Upsource [1],
> > I would like to call a vote on accepting it as our official code review
> > tool.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > This vote will go on for 5 days.
> >
> > [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > com/Code-Review-Tool-Proposal-Upsource-td12195.html
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Use Upsource for Code Review
Posted by Denis Magda <dm...@apache.org>.
+1
—
Denis
> On Nov 16, 2016, at 2:08 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <pt...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Following the discussion on Upsource [1],
> I would like to call a vote on accepting it as our official code review
> tool.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> This vote will go on for 5 days.
>
> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> com/Code-Review-Tool-Proposal-Upsource-td12195.html
Re: [VOTE] Use Upsource for Code Review
Posted by Sergi Vladykin <se...@gmail.com>.
+1
Ok, this makes sense.
Sergi
2016-11-16 14:33 GMT+03:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <ds...@apache.org>:
> +1
>
> I think we should allow this tool, unless it proves counter productive. If
> it does, then we will drop it.
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <pt...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Sergi,
> >
> > I don't think we should enforce it.
> > "Official" means that it will be allowed, linked and described in wiki.
> >
> > It is up to contributor and reviewer to use it.
> > For example, if the changes are small/trivial, creating a review in
> > Upsource is not necessary.
> > If the changes are complex and contributor has not created a review,
> > reviewer may ask to do so.
> > Etc etc.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Sergi Vladykin <
> sergi.vladykin@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Pavel,
> > >
> > > I'm not sure I understand the term "official code review tool", can you
> > > please elaborate it? We will enforce everyone to register in Upsource
> and
> > > use it or what?
> > >
> > > Sergi
> > >
> > > 2016-11-16 13:22 GMT+03:00 Pavel Tupitsyn <pt...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > > Proper link to the discussion:
> > > > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/
> > > > Code-Review-Tool-Proposal-Upsource-td12195.html
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Anton Vinogradov <av...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> > ptupitsyn@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Following the discussion on Upsource [1],
> > > > > > I would like to call a vote on accepting it as our official code
> > > review
> > > > > > tool.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This vote will go on for 5 days.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > > > > com/Code-Review-Tool-Proposal-Upsource-td12195.html
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Use Upsource for Code Review
Posted by Dmitriy Setrakyan <ds...@apache.org>.
+1
I think we should allow this tool, unless it proves counter productive. If
it does, then we will drop it.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Pavel Tupitsyn <pt...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Sergi,
>
> I don't think we should enforce it.
> "Official" means that it will be allowed, linked and described in wiki.
>
> It is up to contributor and reviewer to use it.
> For example, if the changes are small/trivial, creating a review in
> Upsource is not necessary.
> If the changes are complex and contributor has not created a review,
> reviewer may ask to do so.
> Etc etc.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Sergi Vladykin <se...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Pavel,
> >
> > I'm not sure I understand the term "official code review tool", can you
> > please elaborate it? We will enforce everyone to register in Upsource and
> > use it or what?
> >
> > Sergi
> >
> > 2016-11-16 13:22 GMT+03:00 Pavel Tupitsyn <pt...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Proper link to the discussion:
> > > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/
> > > Code-Review-Tool-Proposal-Upsource-td12195.html
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Anton Vinogradov <av...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> ptupitsyn@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Following the discussion on Upsource [1],
> > > > > I would like to call a vote on accepting it as our official code
> > review
> > > > > tool.
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > >
> > > > > This vote will go on for 5 days.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > > > com/Code-Review-Tool-Proposal-Upsource-td12195.html
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Use Upsource for Code Review
Posted by Vladimir Ozerov <vo...@gridgain.com>.
+1
Way to go!
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Andrey Gura <ag...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn <pt...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Sergi,
> >
> > I don't think we should enforce it.
> > "Official" means that it will be allowed, linked and described in wiki.
> >
> > It is up to contributor and reviewer to use it.
> > For example, if the changes are small/trivial, creating a review in
> > Upsource is not necessary.
> > If the changes are complex and contributor has not created a review,
> > reviewer may ask to do so.
> > Etc etc.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Sergi Vladykin <
> sergi.vladykin@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Pavel,
> > >
> > > I'm not sure I understand the term "official code review tool", can you
> > > please elaborate it? We will enforce everyone to register in Upsource
> and
> > > use it or what?
> > >
> > > Sergi
> > >
> > > 2016-11-16 13:22 GMT+03:00 Pavel Tupitsyn <pt...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > > Proper link to the discussion:
> > > > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/
> > > > Code-Review-Tool-Proposal-Upsource-td12195.html
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Anton Vinogradov <av...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> > ptupitsyn@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Following the discussion on Upsource [1],
> > > > > > I would like to call a vote on accepting it as our official code
> > > review
> > > > > > tool.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This vote will go on for 5 days.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > > > > com/Code-Review-Tool-Proposal-Upsource-td12195.html
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Use Upsource for Code Review
Posted by Andrey Gura <ag...@apache.org>.
+1
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn <pt...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Sergi,
>
> I don't think we should enforce it.
> "Official" means that it will be allowed, linked and described in wiki.
>
> It is up to contributor and reviewer to use it.
> For example, if the changes are small/trivial, creating a review in
> Upsource is not necessary.
> If the changes are complex and contributor has not created a review,
> reviewer may ask to do so.
> Etc etc.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Sergi Vladykin <se...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Pavel,
> >
> > I'm not sure I understand the term "official code review tool", can you
> > please elaborate it? We will enforce everyone to register in Upsource and
> > use it or what?
> >
> > Sergi
> >
> > 2016-11-16 13:22 GMT+03:00 Pavel Tupitsyn <pt...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Proper link to the discussion:
> > > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/
> > > Code-Review-Tool-Proposal-Upsource-td12195.html
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Anton Vinogradov <av...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn <
> ptupitsyn@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Following the discussion on Upsource [1],
> > > > > I would like to call a vote on accepting it as our official code
> > review
> > > > > tool.
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > >
> > > > > This vote will go on for 5 days.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > > > com/Code-Review-Tool-Proposal-Upsource-td12195.html
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Use Upsource for Code Review
Posted by Pavel Tupitsyn <pt...@apache.org>.
Sergi,
I don't think we should enforce it.
"Official" means that it will be allowed, linked and described in wiki.
It is up to contributor and reviewer to use it.
For example, if the changes are small/trivial, creating a review in
Upsource is not necessary.
If the changes are complex and contributor has not created a review,
reviewer may ask to do so.
Etc etc.
Thoughts?
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Sergi Vladykin <se...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Pavel,
>
> I'm not sure I understand the term "official code review tool", can you
> please elaborate it? We will enforce everyone to register in Upsource and
> use it or what?
>
> Sergi
>
> 2016-11-16 13:22 GMT+03:00 Pavel Tupitsyn <pt...@apache.org>:
>
> > Proper link to the discussion:
> > http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/
> > Code-Review-Tool-Proposal-Upsource-td12195.html
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Anton Vinogradov <av...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn <pt...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Following the discussion on Upsource [1],
> > > > I would like to call a vote on accepting it as our official code
> review
> > > > tool.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > >
> > > > This vote will go on for 5 days.
> > > >
> > > > [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > > com/Code-Review-Tool-Proposal-Upsource-td12195.html
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Use Upsource for Code Review
Posted by Sergi Vladykin <se...@gmail.com>.
Pavel,
I'm not sure I understand the term "official code review tool", can you
please elaborate it? We will enforce everyone to register in Upsource and
use it or what?
Sergi
2016-11-16 13:22 GMT+03:00 Pavel Tupitsyn <pt...@apache.org>:
> Proper link to the discussion:
> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/
> Code-Review-Tool-Proposal-Upsource-td12195.html
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Anton Vinogradov <av...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn <pt...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Following the discussion on Upsource [1],
> > > I would like to call a vote on accepting it as our official code review
> > > tool.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > >
> > > This vote will go on for 5 days.
> > >
> > > [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > com/Code-Review-Tool-Proposal-Upsource-td12195.html
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Use Upsource for Code Review
Posted by Pavel Tupitsyn <pt...@apache.org>.
Proper link to the discussion:
http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/
Code-Review-Tool-Proposal-Upsource-td12195.html
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Anton Vinogradov <av...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn <pt...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Following the discussion on Upsource [1],
> > I would like to call a vote on accepting it as our official code review
> > tool.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > This vote will go on for 5 days.
> >
> > [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > com/Code-Review-Tool-Proposal-Upsource-td12195.html
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Use Upsource for Code Review
Posted by Anton Vinogradov <av...@apache.org>.
+1
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 1:08 PM, Pavel Tupitsyn <pt...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Following the discussion on Upsource [1],
> I would like to call a vote on accepting it as our official code review
> tool.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> This vote will go on for 5 days.
>
> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> com/Code-Review-Tool-Proposal-Upsource-td12195.html
>
Re: [VOTE] Use Upsource for Code Review
Posted by Pavel Tupitsyn <pt...@apache.org>.
Vladimir, right, see my reply to Sergi above.
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Vladimir Ozerov <vo...@gridgain.com>
wrote:
> Igniters,
>
> As I understand nobody is forced to use this tool, right?
>
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:01 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:57PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> > > Cos, I see your point, but I think this one falls under procedural
> issue,
> > > no?
> >
> > Not really. We are talking about a use of a tool to improve the review
> > process. Dictating a tool would be a step to a wrong direction. It's like
> > imposing the use of IDEA and banishing all Eclipse users (although, I
> > wouldn't
> > mind really ;)
> >
> > Dictation of a development technology is where the rift happens, IMO. But
> > when
> > we are on the same page as the result of the consensus, rather than a
> fiat
> > -
> > that's a different story.
> >
> > Cos
> >
> > k On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > What are we voting for this?
> > > >
> > > > Fortunately, Apache isn't about democracy. [1]
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> > > >
> > > > Cos
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 01:08PM, Pavel Tupitsyn wrote:
> > > > > Following the discussion on Upsource [1],
> > > > > I would like to call a vote on accepting it as our official code
> > review
> > > > > tool.
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > >
> > > > > This vote will go on for 5 days.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > > > com/Code-Review-Tool-Proposal-Upsource-td12195.html
> > > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Use Upsource for Code Review
Posted by Vladimir Ozerov <vo...@gridgain.com>.
Igniters,
As I understand nobody is forced to use this tool, right?
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:01 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:57PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> > Cos, I see your point, but I think this one falls under procedural issue,
> > no?
>
> Not really. We are talking about a use of a tool to improve the review
> process. Dictating a tool would be a step to a wrong direction. It's like
> imposing the use of IDEA and banishing all Eclipse users (although, I
> wouldn't
> mind really ;)
>
> Dictation of a development technology is where the rift happens, IMO. But
> when
> we are on the same page as the result of the consensus, rather than a fiat
> -
> that's a different story.
>
> Cos
>
> k On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > What are we voting for this?
> > >
> > > Fortunately, Apache isn't about democracy. [1]
> > >
> > > [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> > >
> > > Cos
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 01:08PM, Pavel Tupitsyn wrote:
> > > > Following the discussion on Upsource [1],
> > > > I would like to call a vote on accepting it as our official code
> review
> > > > tool.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > >
> > > > This vote will go on for 5 days.
> > > >
> > > > [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > > com/Code-Review-Tool-Proposal-Upsource-td12195.html
> > >
>
Re: [VOTE] Use Upsource for Code Review
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:57PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan wrote:
> Cos, I see your point, but I think this one falls under procedural issue,
> no?
Not really. We are talking about a use of a tool to improve the review
process. Dictating a tool would be a step to a wrong direction. It's like
imposing the use of IDEA and banishing all Eclipse users (although, I wouldn't
mind really ;)
Dictation of a development technology is where the rift happens, IMO. But when
we are on the same page as the result of the consensus, rather than a fiat -
that's a different story.
Cos
k On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > What are we voting for this?
> >
> > Fortunately, Apache isn't about democracy. [1]
> >
> > [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
> >
> > Cos
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 01:08PM, Pavel Tupitsyn wrote:
> > > Following the discussion on Upsource [1],
> > > I would like to call a vote on accepting it as our official code review
> > > tool.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > >
> > > This vote will go on for 5 days.
> > >
> > > [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > > com/Code-Review-Tool-Proposal-Upsource-td12195.html
> >
Re: [VOTE] Use Upsource for Code Review
Posted by Dmitriy Setrakyan <ds...@apache.org>.
Cos, I see your point, but I think this one falls under procedural issue,
no?
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:21 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> What are we voting for this?
>
> Fortunately, Apache isn't about democracy. [1]
>
> [1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
>
> Cos
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 01:08PM, Pavel Tupitsyn wrote:
> > Following the discussion on Upsource [1],
> > I would like to call a vote on accepting it as our official code review
> > tool.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > This vote will go on for 5 days.
> >
> > [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> > com/Code-Review-Tool-Proposal-Upsource-td12195.html
>
Re: [VOTE] Use Upsource for Code Review
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
What are we voting for this?
Fortunately, Apache isn't about democracy. [1]
[1] https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html
Cos
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 01:08PM, Pavel Tupitsyn wrote:
> Following the discussion on Upsource [1],
> I would like to call a vote on accepting it as our official code review
> tool.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> This vote will go on for 5 days.
>
> [1] http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.
> com/Code-Review-Tool-Proposal-Upsource-td12195.html