You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Erick Erickson (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/11/30 14:18:43 UTC
[jira] [Resolved] (LUCENE-2081) CartesianShapeFilter improvements
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Erick Erickson resolved LUCENE-2081.
------------------------------------
Resolution: Won't Fix
2013 Old JIRA cleanup
> CartesianShapeFilter improvements
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2081
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2081
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: modules/spatial
> Affects Versions: 2.9
> Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
> Priority: Minor
>
> The CartesiahShapeFilter could use some improvements. For starters, if we make sure the boxIds are sorted in index order, this should reduce the cost of seeks. I think we should also replace the logging with a similar approach to Lucene's output stream. We also can do Term creation a tad bit more efficiently too.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org