You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@rave.apache.org by "Franklin, Matthew B." <mf...@mitre.org> on 2011/09/02 13:42:23 UTC
MENTOR Vote (was [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.3-incubating Release
Candidate)
The 72 hour vote window closes later today. It would be good if we could get one more Rave mentor vote now so that we don't have to wait for another IPMC member to vote on the incubator list.
-Matt
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ate Douma [mailto:ate@douma.nu]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 6:50 AM
>To: rave-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.3-incubating Release Candidate
>
>On 08/31/2011 12:24 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>> Discussion thread for vote on 0.3-incubating release candidate.
>>
>> For more information on the release process, checkout -
>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
>>
>> Some of the things to check before voting are:
>> - can you run the demo binaries
>yes
>> - can you build the contents of source-release.zip and svn tag
>yes (note: you need to build from both source-release.zips, master and
>project).
>
>> - do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required LICENSE, NOTICE and
>DISCLAIMER files
>yes
>
>I noticed the LICENSE file embedded in the rave-portal war turned out to be
>not
>encoded in UTF-8 but ISO-8859 while all other resources are (and should) be
>UTF-8.
>This is only a minor nit. I fixed this already (took me 2 attempts) in trunk so
>for future releases it is fine right now.
>
>> - are all of the staged jars signed and the signature verifiable
>yes
>> - is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on a public server
>yes
>
>Good work Matt, a clean and complete release!
>
>
Re: MENTOR Vote (was [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.3-incubating Release
Candidate)
Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
On 09/04/2011 10:16 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> Appologies. I'm totally swamped at the moment. I'm not going to get
> the time to review this properly and it's my policy to not vote on a
> release unless I've verified it (which in this case seems strange
> since Ate is so much more thorough than I am).
>
> My chaos will end in 10 days. If you don't have that extra vote by
> then please prod me again.
No worries Ross,
We know you're very busy, and both Matt and myself will meet you later this week
at TransferSummit.
And besides that, we've got the luxury of 5 Rave mentors!
Maybe Hadrian or Upayavira can chime in if they have a spare moment to validate
the release candidate?
At any rate, I suggest to now wrap up this vote by the Rave community itself as
it clearly succeeded.
As Matt indicated, for the follow up Incubator vote we need (at least) one more
IPMC member to accept the release candidate, which could be one of our own
mentors, but any other IPMC member vote will do just as well.
Kind regards,
Ate
>
> With regret,
> Ross
>
> On 2 September 2011 12:42, Franklin, Matthew B.<mf...@mitre.org> wrote:
>> The 72 hour vote window closes later today. It would be good if we could get one more Rave mentor vote now so that we don't have to wait for another IPMC member to vote on the incubator list.
>>
>> -Matt
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Ate Douma [mailto:ate@douma.nu]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 6:50 AM
>>> To: rave-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.3-incubating Release Candidate
>>>
>>> On 08/31/2011 12:24 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>>> Discussion thread for vote on 0.3-incubating release candidate.
>>>>
>>>> For more information on the release process, checkout -
>>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
>>>>
>>>> Some of the things to check before voting are:
>>>> - can you run the demo binaries
>>> yes
>>>> - can you build the contents of source-release.zip and svn tag
>>> yes (note: you need to build from both source-release.zips, master and
>>> project).
>>>
>>>> - do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required LICENSE, NOTICE and
>>> DISCLAIMER files
>>> yes
>>>
>>> I noticed the LICENSE file embedded in the rave-portal war turned out to be
>>> not
>>> encoded in UTF-8 but ISO-8859 while all other resources are (and should) be
>>> UTF-8.
>>> This is only a minor nit. I fixed this already (took me 2 attempts) in trunk so
>>> for future releases it is fine right now.
>>>
>>>> - are all of the staged jars signed and the signature verifiable
>>> yes
>>>> - is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on a public server
>>> yes
>>>
>>> Good work Matt, a clean and complete release!
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: MENTOR Vote (was [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.3-incubating Release Candidate)
Posted by Ross Gardler <rg...@opendirective.com>.
Appologies. I'm totally swamped at the moment. I'm not going to get
the time to review this properly and it's my policy to not vote on a
release unless I've verified it (which in this case seems strange
since Ate is so much more thorough than I am).
My chaos will end in 10 days. If you don't have that extra vote by
then please prod me again.
With regret,
Ross
On 2 September 2011 12:42, Franklin, Matthew B. <mf...@mitre.org> wrote:
> The 72 hour vote window closes later today. It would be good if we could get one more Rave mentor vote now so that we don't have to wait for another IPMC member to vote on the incubator list.
>
> -Matt
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Ate Douma [mailto:ate@douma.nu]
>>Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2011 6:50 AM
>>To: rave-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Rave 0.3-incubating Release Candidate
>>
>>On 08/31/2011 12:24 AM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote:
>>> Discussion thread for vote on 0.3-incubating release candidate.
>>>
>>> For more information on the release process, checkout -
>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html
>>>
>>> Some of the things to check before voting are:
>>> - can you run the demo binaries
>>yes
>>> - can you build the contents of source-release.zip and svn tag
>>yes (note: you need to build from both source-release.zips, master and
>>project).
>>
>>> - do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required LICENSE, NOTICE and
>>DISCLAIMER files
>>yes
>>
>>I noticed the LICENSE file embedded in the rave-portal war turned out to be
>>not
>>encoded in UTF-8 but ISO-8859 while all other resources are (and should) be
>>UTF-8.
>>This is only a minor nit. I fixed this already (took me 2 attempts) in trunk so
>>for future releases it is fine right now.
>>
>>> - are all of the staged jars signed and the signature verifiable
>>yes
>>> - is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on a public server
>>yes
>>
>>Good work Matt, a clean and complete release!
>>
>>
>
>
--
Ross Gardler (@rgardler)
Programme Leader (Open Development)
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com