You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> on 2009/11/04 11:54:53 UTC
Re: [Trinidad 2.0] Ordering of artifacts (sec 11.4.7 in the JSF 2.0
spec)
As there are some limitations (see TRINIDAD-1603) and picking an ugly one, like
<faces-config>
<name>
org_apache_myfaces_trinidad
</name>
...
</faces-config>
doesn't make much sense, what do folks think about picking a
simplified version ?
<faces-config>
<name>
trinidad
</name>
...
</faces-config>
There shouldn't be much issues with "trinidad" as the (kinda) unique name...
Thoughts ?
-Matthias
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Andy Schwartz
<an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Matthias -
>
> I like "org.apache.myfaces.trinidad".
>
> Just out of curiosity I sent email to the EG to see what other folks
> have done. I don't think we need to wait for that info, but I will
> pass along any responses.
>
> Andy
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [Trinidad 2.0] Ordering of artifacts (sec 11.4.7 in the JSF 2.0
spec)
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
Ok...
they moved the BUG to be SPEC specific, which means (to my understanding)
that this won't be solved in the near future. See the spec ticket here:
https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=662
as there was no veto on using "trinidad", I committed it to the source;
There shouldn't be big issues with that ... and if they fix the behavior,
we can always change it and release note the issue, but I guess there
is almost on problem with that...
-Matthias
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> As there are some limitations (see TRINIDAD-1603) and picking an ugly one, like
>
> <faces-config>
>
> <name>
> org_apache_myfaces_trinidad
> </name>
> ...
>
> </faces-config>
>
> doesn't make much sense, what do folks think about picking a
> simplified version ?
>
> <faces-config>
> <name>
> trinidad
> </name>
> ...
> </faces-config>
>
> There shouldn't be much issues with "trinidad" as the (kinda) unique name...
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> -Matthias
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Andy Schwartz
> <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hey Matthias -
>>
>> I like "org.apache.myfaces.trinidad".
>>
>> Just out of curiosity I sent email to the EG to see what other folks
>> have done. I don't think we need to wait for that info, but I will
>> pass along any responses.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf