You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by vetrik kumaran murugesan <ve...@gmail.com> on 2015/09/30 23:55:44 UTC
Solr search
Dear Team,
I am wondering can we use Solr 5.3 search server without the following
jar files,
commonsfileupload: 1.2.1
xerces : xercesImpl : 2.9.1
org.apache.ant : ant : 1.8.2
If yes , how can I do it. I am trying to evaluate Solr 5.3 , you input is
valuable and appreciated.
Thanks,
Vetrik
Re: Solr search
Posted by vetrik kumaran murugesan <ve...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Thanks to Upayavira ,Shawn Heisey, Uwe and Benson and appreciate them for
helping me providing necessary information.
I was trying to understand the usage and licensing of following files, for
using SOLR for our client project.
1. Tagsoup 1.2.1
2. Junit4-ant v 2.1.13
3. com.googlecode.juniversalchardet v1.0.3
4. commonsfileupload: 1.2.1
5. xercesImpl : 2.9.1
@ Upayavira,
I was trying to understand the dual licensing on these files, but
your replies help me understand it better.
Thanks,
Vetrikkumaran Murugesan
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.lucene.solr.user/113392 -
was helpful
Thanks
2015-09-30 17:27 GMT-05:00 Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015, at 10:55 PM, vetrik kumaran murugesan wrote:
>
> Dear Team,
>
> I am wondering can we use Solr 5.3 search server without the following
> jar files,
>
> commonsfileupload: 1.2.1
> xerces : xercesImpl : 2.9.1
> org.apache.ant : ant : 1.8.2
>
>
> If yes , how can I do it. I am trying to evaluate Solr 5.3 , you input is
> valuable and appreciated.
>
>
> Why would you want to do that?
>
> xerces is an XML parser. It wouldn't surprise me if Solr couldn't load its
> configs without it. Seems kinda important.
>
> All the files you mention above are (as far as I understand) Apache code,
> therefore Apache licensed. Why is their use a factor in your evaluation?
>
> Upayavira
>
Re: Solr search
Posted by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>.
There are some dependencies that are dual licensed, e.g GPL and MIT. we
are accepting them under the terms of the MIT license NOT the GPL. Thus,
you can be sure that the software included in Lucene or Solr will not
include any code for which you must follow the obligations of the GPL.
upayavira
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015, at 06:56 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The licenses of those files are all explained and listed in the
> licenses/ subdirectory of the Solr distribution (same for Lucene). All
> those 3 files are Apache 2.0 license, see corresponding files:
> -ant-LICENSE-ASL.txt, but I think you are talking about junit4-ant-LICENSE-
> ASL.txt
> -commons-fileupload-LICENSE-ASL.txt
> -xercesImpl-LICENSE-ASL.txt
>
> If you have any doubt about the used licenses, please clearly state
> the lines of code that you think are GPL.
>
> There is lots of other code under MIT license (“ls
> licenses/**MIT**.txt”), which is perfectly valid for Apache products.
> But there is no GPL code listed in our official license records, which
> would violate Apache’s license restrictions.
>
> The files of xerces or fileupload that you mention cannot be
> removed, only ant/junit4-ant can be removed – because it is a test
> dependency only.
>
> Uwe
>
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de[1]
> eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
>
> *From:* vetrik kumaran murugesan [mailto:vetrikam@gmail.com] *Sent:*
> Thursday, October 01, 2015 3:11 AM *To:* dev@lucene.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: Solr search
>
> Hi Upayavira,
>
> Thanks for your quick reply.
>
> Files above use GPL and MIT license , like junit4-ant 2.1.13 has GPL
> and MIT.
>
> Regards,
>
> Vetrik
>
>
>
> 2015-09-30 17:27 GMT-05:00 Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015, at 10:55 PM, vetrik kumaran murugesan wrote:
>> Dear Team,
>>
>> I am wondering can we use Solr 5.3 search server without the
>> following jar files,
>>
>> commonsfileupload: 1.2.1
>> xerces : xercesImpl : 2.9.1
>> org.apache.ant : ant : 1.8.2
>>
>>
>> If yes , how can I do it. I am trying to evaluate Solr 5.3 , you
>> input is valuable and appreciated.
>
> Why would you want to do that?
>
> xerces is an XML parser. It wouldn't surprise me if Solr couldn't load
> its configs without it. Seems kinda important.
>
> All the files you mention above are (as far as I understand) Apache
> code, therefore Apache licensed. Why is their use a factor in your
> evaluation?
>
> Upayavira
>
Links:
1. http://www.thetaphi.de/
RE: Solr search
Posted by Uwe Schindler <uw...@thetaphi.de>.
Hi,
The licenses of those files are all explained and listed in the licenses/ subdirectory of the Solr distribution (same for Lucene). All those 3 files are Apache 2.0 license, see corresponding files:
- ant-LICENSE-ASL.txt, but I think you are talking about junit4-ant-LICENSE-ASL.txt
- commons-fileupload-LICENSE-ASL.txt
- xercesImpl-LICENSE-ASL.txt
If you have any doubt about the used licenses, please clearly state the lines of code that you think are GPL.
There is lots of other code under MIT license (“ls licenses/*MIT*.txt”), which is perfectly valid for Apache products.
But there is no GPL code listed in our official license records, which would violate Apache’s license restrictions.
The files of xerces or fileupload that you mention cannot be removed, only ant/junit4-ant can be removed – because it is a test dependency only.
Uwe
-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
<http://www.thetaphi.de/> http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: uwe@thetaphi.de
From: vetrik kumaran murugesan [mailto:vetrikam@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 3:11 AM
To: dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr search
Hi Upayavira,
Thanks for your quick reply.
Files above use GPL and MIT license , like junit4-ant 2.1.13 has GPL and MIT.
Regards,
Vetrik
2015-09-30 17:27 GMT-05:00 Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015, at 10:55 PM, vetrik kumaran murugesan wrote:
Dear Team,
I am wondering can we use Solr 5.3 search server without the following jar files,
commonsfileupload: 1.2.1
xerces : xercesImpl : 2.9.1
org.apache.ant : ant : 1.8.2
If yes , how can I do it. I am trying to evaluate Solr 5.3 , you input is valuable and appreciated.
Why would you want to do that?
xerces is an XML parser. It wouldn't surprise me if Solr couldn't load its configs without it. Seems kinda important.
All the files you mention above are (as far as I understand) Apache code, therefore Apache licensed. Why is their use a factor in your evaluation?
Upayavira
Re: Solr search
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 9:11 PM, vetrik kumaran murugesan
<ve...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Upayavira,
>
> Thanks for your quick reply.
>
> Files above use GPL and MIT license , like junit4-ant 2.1.13 has GPL and
> MIT.
There is no MIT or GPL to Xerces or ant, they are Apache products. Why
makes you think otherwise?
>
> Regards,
>
> Vetrik
>
>
>
> 2015-09-30 17:27 GMT-05:00 Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015, at 10:55 PM, vetrik kumaran murugesan wrote:
>>
>> Dear Team,
>>
>> I am wondering can we use Solr 5.3 search server without the following
>> jar files,
>>
>> commonsfileupload: 1.2.1
>> xerces : xercesImpl : 2.9.1
>> org.apache.ant : ant : 1.8.2
>>
>>
>> If yes , how can I do it. I am trying to evaluate Solr 5.3 , you input is
>> valuable and appreciated.
>>
>>
>> Why would you want to do that?
>>
>> xerces is an XML parser. It wouldn't surprise me if Solr couldn't load its
>> configs without it. Seems kinda important.
>>
>> All the files you mention above are (as far as I understand) Apache code,
>> therefore Apache licensed. Why is their use a factor in your evaluation?
>>
>> Upayavira
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: Solr search
Posted by vetrik kumaran murugesan <ve...@gmail.com>.
Hi Upayavira,
Thanks for your quick reply.
Files above use GPL and MIT license , like junit4-ant 2.1.13 has GPL and
MIT.
Regards,
Vetrik
2015-09-30 17:27 GMT-05:00 Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015, at 10:55 PM, vetrik kumaran murugesan wrote:
>
> Dear Team,
>
> I am wondering can we use Solr 5.3 search server without the following
> jar files,
>
> commonsfileupload: 1.2.1
> xerces : xercesImpl : 2.9.1
> org.apache.ant : ant : 1.8.2
>
>
> If yes , how can I do it. I am trying to evaluate Solr 5.3 , you input is
> valuable and appreciated.
>
>
> Why would you want to do that?
>
> xerces is an XML parser. It wouldn't surprise me if Solr couldn't load its
> configs without it. Seems kinda important.
>
> All the files you mention above are (as far as I understand) Apache code,
> therefore Apache licensed. Why is their use a factor in your evaluation?
>
> Upayavira
>
Re: Solr search
Posted by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015, at 10:55 PM, vetrik kumaran murugesan wrote:
> Dear Team,
>
> I am wondering can we use Solr 5.3 search �server �without the
> following jar files,
>
> commonsfileupload: 1.2.1 xerces : xercesImpl : 2.9.1 org.apache.ant :
> ant : 1.8.2
>
>
> If yes , how can I do it. I am trying to evaluate Solr 5.3 , you input
> is valuable and appreciated.
Why would you want to do that?
xerces is an XML parser. It wouldn't surprise me if Solr couldn't load
its configs without it. Seems kinda important.
All the files you mention above are (as far as I understand) Apache
code, therefore Apache licensed. Why is their use a factor in your
evaluation?
Upayavira