[jira] Reopened: (FELIX-1600) ServiceReference.isAssignableTo() always returns true if requesting bundle has no wire

["Richard S. Hall (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Richard S. Hall reopened FELIX-1600:
------------------------------------


It turns out this fix is not 100% correct...it messes up when there is a service being provided under multiple interfaces and a client requests under one interface and doesn't have access to the other. I will need to look into some changes, then we will have to test it again.

> ServiceReference.isAssignableTo() always returns true if requesting bundle has no wire
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FELIX-1600
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1600
>             Project: Felix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Framework
>    Affects Versions: felix-2.0.0
>            Reporter: Stuart McCulloch
>            Assignee: Richard S. Hall
>             Fix For: felix-2.2.0
>
>
> [ from http://markmail.org/message/pu5usr5s7vsweyv3 ]
> I think there's a bug in our ServiceReference.isAssignableTo implementation...
> the javadoc for this method states:
>  "This method performs the following checks:
>    1. Get the package name from the specified class name.
>    2. For the bundle that registered the service referenced by this ServiceReference (registrant bundle);
>        find the source for the package. If no source is found then return true if the registrant bundle is
>        equal to the specified bundle; otherwise return false.
>    3. If the package source of the registrant bundle is equal to the package source of the specified
>       bundle then return true; otherwise return false."
> whereas our implementation does:
>             // There are three situations that may occur here:
>             //   1. The requester does not have a wire for the package.
>             //   2. The provider does not have a wire for the package.
>             //   3. Both have a wire for the package.
>             // For case 1, we do not filter the service reference since we
>             // assume that the bundle is using reflection or that it won't
>             // use that class at all since it does not import it. For
>             // case 2, we have to try to load the class from the class
>             // loader of the service object and then compare the class
>             // loaders to determine if we should filter the service
>             // refernce. In case 3, we simply compare the exporting
>             // modules from the package wiring to determine if we need
>             // to filter the service reference.
> assume both the provider and requester have no wire for the package
> (as happens when a bundle uses it's own export, as in this situation)
> the javadoc says isAssignableTo should return false, because the
> provider has no wire and the provider != requester - but we'll return
> true because the requester has no wire and we do that check first

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.