[jira] [Resolved] (SOLR-10118) Wrong comments in example schema about DocValues requirements

["Munendra S N (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Munendra S N resolved SOLR-10118.
---------------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed

basic_configs are removed and _default configset is introduced. 


{noformat}
<!-- The StrField [...]
        It supports doc values but in that case the field needs to be
        single-valued and either required or have a default value.
       -->
{noformat}

{noformat}
   <!--
     Default numeric field types. [...]

     These fields support doc values, but they require the field to be
     single-valued and either be required or have a default value.
   -->
{noformat}
These are already corrected/updated


> Wrong comments in example schema about DocValues requirements
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-10118
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10118
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: examples
>    Affects Versions: 6.4.1
>            Reporter: Andreas Hubold
>            Priority: Trivial
>
> Comments in the example schema files of Solr about field
> requirements for DocValues seem to be wrong. For example, in
> server/solr/configsets/basic_configs/conf/managed-schema:
> {noformat}
>      docValues: [...] they might
>         require the field to be single-valued, be required or have a default
>         value (check the documentation of the field type you're
> interested in
>         for more information)
>      <!-- The StrField [...]
>         It supports doc values but in that case the field needs to be
>         single-valued and either required or have a default value.
>        -->
>    <!--
>      Default numeric field types. [...]
>      These fields support doc values, but they require the field to be
>      single-valued and either be required or have a default value.
>    -->
> {noformat}
> I haven't found these limitations in the reference guide. It states that
> multi-valued DocValues are stored as SORTED_SET. 
> The comments are probably outdated?
> It seems the restrictions have been removed, e.g. with SOLR-4490 and https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/d208878c116bb66d6cb114ce51f69b7264ab668a#diff-ecbdc5fb2ccf861a92837e21fb37ace8



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org