[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (OAK-3785) IndexDefinition should expose underlying node state

["Chetan Mehrotra (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Chetan Mehrotra updated OAK-3785:
---------------------------------
    Comment: was deleted

(was: Again like OAK-3576 bit late for review but still ;)

I checked the logic and was thinking that same effect can be achieved now also by just setting {{index}} to false on the given property definition node. The presence of property definition would trigger {{propertyChanged}} call for such a property to lead to {{propertiesChanged}} set to true. And this would trigger the call to {{makeDocument}} and that would enable call to the {{IndexFieldProvider}}

Thoughts?)

> IndexDefinition should expose underlying node state
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OAK-3785
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-3785
>             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
>          Issue Type: Technical task
>          Components: lucene
>            Reporter: Vikas Saurabh
>            Assignee: Vikas Saurabh
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.3.13
>
>
> For OAK-3576, we want to pass index definition's {{NodeState}} to registered callbacks. Thus, we want to expose the underlying {{NodeState}} for currently used {{IndexDefinition}}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)