You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com> on 2010/06/01 21:47:03 UTC
Fw: Dojo tree 1.4
Forwarded again :(
This time I removed the links and replaced them by tinylinks
Jacques
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
To: <de...@ofbiz.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 2:10 PM
Subject: Fw: Dojo tree 1.4
> Forwarding, not sure why this did not get through, maybe the links...
>
> Jacques
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
> To: <de...@ofbiz.apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 9:03 AM
> Subject: Dojo tree 1.4
>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was discussing with Ankit and Sascha (who, I'm sure you know, greatly helped with Atul on the layered lookups) about new things
>> to improve in the UI.
>> They were interested by the tree and reported this link http://tinyurl.com/38xrxd5
>>
>> We have already first fruits at http://tinyurl.com/3axfg75 but we use an older (1.2?) version of Dojo and we need 1.4 for new
>> stuff like different icons on each node, drag&drop, etc.
>> see http://tinyurl.com/37srt6k and you may look for more in pages (I searched only in title)
>>
>> Unfortunately this is not only code enhancement as the 1.4 works a bit differently than previous one for trees. So the code
>> related to the OFBiz link above needs a bit of revamping.
>>
>> This message to let you know that there will be an effort on the Dojo tree, because I know some don't like to have many js libs
>> in OFBiz. So if you feel we should do otherwise please speak...
>> For me it's not a problem to have Prototype and Dojo as long as they don't collide.
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>
Re: Dojo tree 1.4
Posted by Scott Gray <sc...@hotwaxmedia.com>.
I'd have to agree, I still feel pretty strongly that we should only have one javascript library in OFBiz.
I've used this tree before on top of prototype: http://weblog.axent.pl/examples/js.drag-drop-tree/
I'm not sure how it compares feature-wise to the dojo tree but I found it met my needs just fine and didn't require any strange html layouts or non-compliant xhtml attributes like dojo does.
Regards
Scott
HotWax Media
http://www.hotwaxmedia.com
On 2/06/2010, at 12:42 PM, Anil Patel wrote:
> I have mixed feelings. IMO we should use prototype (prototype based UI components), and not use Dojo.
>
> If we are really not happy with UI plugins in prototype then I'll personally prefer JQuery over Dojo for sure.
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Anil Patel
> HotWax Media Inc
> Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz"
>
> On Jun 1, 2010, at 3:47 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> Forwarded again :(
>>
>> This time I removed the links and replaced them by tinylinks
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
>> To: <de...@ofbiz.apache.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 2:10 PM
>> Subject: Fw: Dojo tree 1.4
>>
>>
>>> Forwarding, not sure why this did not get through, maybe the links...
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
>>> To: <de...@ofbiz.apache.org>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 9:03 AM
>>> Subject: Dojo tree 1.4
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I was discussing with Ankit and Sascha (who, I'm sure you know, greatly helped with Atul on the layered lookups) about new things to improve in the UI.
>>>> They were interested by the tree and reported this link http://tinyurl.com/38xrxd5
>>>>
>>>> We have already first fruits at http://tinyurl.com/3axfg75 but we use an older (1.2?) version of Dojo and we need 1.4 for new stuff like different icons on each node, drag&drop, etc.
>>>> see http://tinyurl.com/37srt6k and you may look for more in pages (I searched only in title)
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately this is not only code enhancement as the 1.4 works a bit differently than previous one for trees. So the code related to the OFBiz link above needs a bit of revamping.
>>>>
>>>> This message to let you know that there will be an effort on the Dojo tree, because I know some don't like to have many js libs in OFBiz. So if you feel we should do otherwise please speak...
>>>> For me it's not a problem to have Prototype and Dojo as long as they don't collide.
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Dojo tree 1.4
Posted by Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>.
Thanks Anil,
Any other opinions? I have no problems to use both, or even JQuery. But I must say that I have never used prototype based UI
components.
Could you elaborate Anil, why your choices, what are the reasons? Have you already selected some prototype based UI components? Is
there something which could replace the Dojo tree? I don't like much the idea of external plugins that could not be supported in
time :/
Jacques
From: "Anil Patel" <an...@hotwaxmedia.com>
>I have mixed feelings. IMO we should use prototype (prototype based UI components), and not use Dojo.
>
> If we are really not happy with UI plugins in prototype then I'll personally prefer JQuery over Dojo for sure.
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Anil Patel
> HotWax Media Inc
> Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz"
>
> On Jun 1, 2010, at 3:47 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>
>> Forwarded again :(
>>
>> This time I removed the links and replaced them by tinylinks
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
>> To: <de...@ofbiz.apache.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 2:10 PM
>> Subject: Fw: Dojo tree 1.4
>>
>>
>>> Forwarding, not sure why this did not get through, maybe the links...
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
>>> To: <de...@ofbiz.apache.org>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 9:03 AM
>>> Subject: Dojo tree 1.4
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I was discussing with Ankit and Sascha (who, I'm sure you know, greatly helped with Atul on the layered lookups) about new
>>>> things to improve in the UI.
>>>> They were interested by the tree and reported this link http://tinyurl.com/38xrxd5
>>>>
>>>> We have already first fruits at http://tinyurl.com/3axfg75 but we use an older (1.2?) version of Dojo and we need 1.4 for new
>>>> stuff like different icons on each node, drag&drop, etc.
>>>> see http://tinyurl.com/37srt6k and you may look for more in pages (I searched only in title)
>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately this is not only code enhancement as the 1.4 works a bit differently than previous one for trees. So the code
>>>> related to the OFBiz link above needs a bit of revamping.
>>>>
>>>> This message to let you know that there will be an effort on the Dojo tree, because I know some don't like to have many js libs
>>>> in OFBiz. So if you feel we should do otherwise please speak...
>>>> For me it's not a problem to have Prototype and Dojo as long as they don't collide.
>>>>
>>>> Jacques
>>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Dojo tree 1.4
Posted by Anil Patel <an...@hotwaxmedia.com>.
I have mixed feelings. IMO we should use prototype (prototype based UI components), and not use Dojo.
If we are really not happy with UI plugins in prototype then I'll personally prefer JQuery over Dojo for sure.
Thanks and Regards
Anil Patel
HotWax Media Inc
Find us on the web at www.hotwaxmedia.com or Google Keyword "ofbiz"
On Jun 1, 2010, at 3:47 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
> Forwarded again :(
>
> This time I removed the links and replaced them by tinylinks
>
> Jacques
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
> To: <de...@ofbiz.apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 2:10 PM
> Subject: Fw: Dojo tree 1.4
>
>
>> Forwarding, not sure why this did not get through, maybe the links...
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacques Le Roux" <ja...@les7arts.com>
>> To: <de...@ofbiz.apache.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 9:03 AM
>> Subject: Dojo tree 1.4
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was discussing with Ankit and Sascha (who, I'm sure you know, greatly helped with Atul on the layered lookups) about new things to improve in the UI.
>>> They were interested by the tree and reported this link http://tinyurl.com/38xrxd5
>>>
>>> We have already first fruits at http://tinyurl.com/3axfg75 but we use an older (1.2?) version of Dojo and we need 1.4 for new stuff like different icons on each node, drag&drop, etc.
>>> see http://tinyurl.com/37srt6k and you may look for more in pages (I searched only in title)
>>>
>>> Unfortunately this is not only code enhancement as the 1.4 works a bit differently than previous one for trees. So the code related to the OFBiz link above needs a bit of revamping.
>>>
>>> This message to let you know that there will be an effort on the Dojo tree, because I know some don't like to have many js libs in OFBiz. So if you feel we should do otherwise please speak...
>>> For me it's not a problem to have Prototype and Dojo as long as they don't collide.
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>
>
Re: Fw: Dojo tree 1.4
Posted by Sascha Rodekamp <sa...@googlemail.com>.
Hey Guys,
for me it doesn't matter if i extend the UI with Prototype or Dojo both
libraries have it's advantages (and disadvantages).
Maybe we could think of updating Prototype to Version 1.7_RC2 or updating
Dojo to 1.4.
Jep Anil i prefere JQuery, too. But we can' use all these libraries at the
same time (i tested a few days ago and you will get a lot of problems
regarding to equal method defintions and so on) and in my opinion it's to
much work to replace all JavaScript Sources which are based on Dojo or
prototype with JQuery.
So i had a lock at the new Dojo and i'm with Jacques to upgrade the library
and use the new Widgets for our UI (like the tree).
Cheers
Sascha
2010/6/1 Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>
> Forwarded again :(
>
> This time I removed the links and replaced them by tinylinks
>
> Jacques
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacques Le Roux" <
> jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com>
> To: <de...@ofbiz.apache.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 2:10 PM
> Subject: Fw: Dojo tree 1.4
>
>
> Forwarding, not sure why this did not get through, maybe the links...
>>
>> Jacques
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacques Le Roux" <
>> jacques.le.roux@les7arts.com>
>> To: <de...@ofbiz.apache.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2010 9:03 AM
>> Subject: Dojo tree 1.4
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was discussing with Ankit and Sascha (who, I'm sure you know, greatly
>>> helped with Atul on the layered lookups) about new things to improve in the
>>> UI.
>>> They were interested by the tree and reported this link
>>> http://tinyurl.com/38xrxd5
>>>
>>> We have already first fruits at http://tinyurl.com/3axfg75 but we use an
>>> older (1.2?) version of Dojo and we need 1.4 for new stuff like different
>>> icons on each node, drag&drop, etc.
>>> see http://tinyurl.com/37srt6k and you may look for more in pages (I
>>> searched only in title)
>>>
>>> Unfortunately this is not only code enhancement as the 1.4 works a bit
>>> differently than previous one for trees. So the code related to the OFBiz
>>> link above needs a bit of revamping.
>>>
>>> This message to let you know that there will be an effort on the Dojo
>>> tree, because I know some don't like to have many js libs in OFBiz. So if
>>> you feel we should do otherwise please speak...
>>> For me it's not a problem to have Prototype and Dojo as long as they
>>> don't collide.
>>>
>>> Jacques
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
--
http://www.lynx.de