You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Henri Yandell <ba...@generationjava.com> on 2003/07/30 06:14:22 UTC
[lang] Clover coverage report for Lang 2.0
I've been wanting to play with Clover, so took the time out to figure it
out a little and run it on Lang. I generated the HTML report [there's a
PDF, XML and a GUI as well] which is available at:
http://www.flamefew.net/~hen/lang/clover_html/
Clover seems like a pretty good tool to show us which bits aren't tested
yet. I had included the reflect sub-package, but it sucks in comparison to
the others test-wise so I decided to go just with 2.0.
It's just a 30 day evaluation, but open-source projects can get free
licences, so if it's of use we can do that.
Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [lang] Clover coverage report for Lang 2.0
Posted by "J.Pietschmann" <j3...@yahoo.de>.
Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
> No, I think each subprojects should have own license.
Again, it would be interesting to get
http://hansel.sourceforge.net/
(recently released 1.0), or
http://quilt.sourceforge.net/
working. Unfortunately, the latter had no activity for more
than half a year.
J.Pietschmann
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [lang] Clover coverage report for Lang 2.0
Posted by Tetsuya Kitahata <te...@apache.org>.
No, I think each subprojects should have own license.
(But, I am not sure whether [lang] and [httpclient]
can use the same license as both are under the same
jakarta-commons...)
cf.
http://www.mail-archive.com/commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org/msg20843.html
-- Tetsuya (tetsuya@apache.org)
--
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 07:56:49 -0400 (EDT)
(Subject: Re: [lang] Clover coverage report for Lang 2.0)
Henri Yandell <ba...@generationjava.com> wrote:
>
> So there's a single licence for Jakarta that can be used?
>
> Hen
>
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi Henri,
> >
> > IIRC, Commons HTTPClient Team has already got the license of
> > Clover. Jakarta-Poi has this one, too.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > -- Tetsuya (tetsuya@apache.org)
> >
> > On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:14:22 -0400 (EDT)
> > (Subject: [lang] Clover coverage report for Lang 2.0)
> > Henri Yandell <ba...@generationjava.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I've been wanting to play with Clover, so took the time out to figure it
> > > out a little and run it on Lang. I generated the HTML report [there's a
> > > PDF, XML and a GUI as well] which is available at:
> > >
> > > http://www.flamefew.net/~hen/lang/clover_html/
> > >
> > > Clover seems like a pretty good tool to show us which bits aren't tested
> > > yet. I had included the reflect sub-package, but it sucks in comparison to
> > > the others test-wise so I decided to go just with 2.0.
> > >
> > > It's just a 30 day evaluation, but open-source projects can get free
> > > licences, so if it's of use we can do that.
> > >
> > > Hen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [lang] Clover coverage report for Lang 2.0
Posted by Henri Yandell <ba...@generationjava.com>.
So there's a single licence for Jakarta that can be used?
Hen
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
>
> Hi Henri,
>
> IIRC, Commons HTTPClient Team has already got the license of
> Clover. Jakarta-Poi has this one, too.
>
> Cheers,
>
> -- Tetsuya (tetsuya@apache.org)
>
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:14:22 -0400 (EDT)
> (Subject: [lang] Clover coverage report for Lang 2.0)
> Henri Yandell <ba...@generationjava.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > I've been wanting to play with Clover, so took the time out to figure it
> > out a little and run it on Lang. I generated the HTML report [there's a
> > PDF, XML and a GUI as well] which is available at:
> >
> > http://www.flamefew.net/~hen/lang/clover_html/
> >
> > Clover seems like a pretty good tool to show us which bits aren't tested
> > yet. I had included the reflect sub-package, but it sucks in comparison to
> > the others test-wise so I decided to go just with 2.0.
> >
> > It's just a 30 day evaluation, but open-source projects can get free
> > licences, so if it's of use we can do that.
> >
> > Hen
>
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Tetsuya Kitahata -- Terra-International, Inc.
> E-mail: tetsuya@apache.org
> http://www.terra-intl.com/
> (Apache Jakarta Translation, Japanese)
> http://jakarta.terra-intl.com/
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [lang] Clover coverage report for Lang 2.0
Posted by Tetsuya Kitahata <te...@apache.org>.
Hi Henri,
IIRC, Commons HTTPClient Team has already got the license of
Clover. Jakarta-Poi has this one, too.
Cheers,
-- Tetsuya (tetsuya@apache.org)
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:14:22 -0400 (EDT)
(Subject: [lang] Clover coverage report for Lang 2.0)
Henri Yandell <ba...@generationjava.com> wrote:
>
> I've been wanting to play with Clover, so took the time out to figure it
> out a little and run it on Lang. I generated the HTML report [there's a
> PDF, XML and a GUI as well] which is available at:
>
> http://www.flamefew.net/~hen/lang/clover_html/
>
> Clover seems like a pretty good tool to show us which bits aren't tested
> yet. I had included the reflect sub-package, but it sucks in comparison to
> the others test-wise so I decided to go just with 2.0.
>
> It's just a 30 day evaluation, but open-source projects can get free
> licences, so if it's of use we can do that.
>
> Hen
-----------------------------------------------------
Tetsuya Kitahata -- Terra-International, Inc.
E-mail: tetsuya@apache.org
http://www.terra-intl.com/
(Apache Jakarta Translation, Japanese)
http://jakarta.terra-intl.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [lang] Clover coverage report for Lang 2.0
Posted by Henri Yandell <ba...@generationjava.com>.
Actually it's really easy and who needs to warm up :)
Re-run of clover done and up at:
http://www.flamefew.net/~hen/lang/clover_html/
[though possibly I should have kept the old one]
Hasn't changed as much as Stephen hoped :)
Hen
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> Got a game of football tonight, but will re-run clover when I get back and
> re-post the url.
>
> Hen
>
> On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
>
> > Another clover run would be useful ;-)
> >
> > We were at 86.6% overall, we should be a bit better now.
> > Hopefully lang and enum will be about 95%
> >
> > Stephen
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Henri Yandell" <ba...@generationjava.com>
> > >
> > > http://www.thecortex.net/clover/index.html is the clover homepage btw.
> > >
> > > It used to integrate into Maven, so I assume it still does. I'm not sure
> > > what the ? marks in the margin mean. I guess that it can't test them.
> > >
> > > Hen
> > >
> > > On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Henri Yandell wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I've been wanting to play with Clover, so took the time out to figure it
> > > > out a little and run it on Lang. I generated the HTML report [there's a
> > > > PDF, XML and a GUI as well] which is available at:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.flamefew.net/~hen/lang/clover_html/
> > > >
> > > > Clover seems like a pretty good tool to show us which bits aren't tested
> > > > yet. I had included the reflect sub-package, but it sucks in comparison
> > to
> > > > the others test-wise so I decided to go just with 2.0.
> > > >
> > > > It's just a 30 day evaluation, but open-source projects can get free
> > > > licences, so if it's of use we can do that.
> > > >
> > > > Hen
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [lang] Clover coverage report for Lang 2.0
Posted by Henri Yandell <ba...@generationjava.com>.
Got a game of football tonight, but will re-run clover when I get back and
re-post the url.
Hen
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> Another clover run would be useful ;-)
>
> We were at 86.6% overall, we should be a bit better now.
> Hopefully lang and enum will be about 95%
>
> Stephen
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Henri Yandell" <ba...@generationjava.com>
> >
> > http://www.thecortex.net/clover/index.html is the clover homepage btw.
> >
> > It used to integrate into Maven, so I assume it still does. I'm not sure
> > what the ? marks in the margin mean. I guess that it can't test them.
> >
> > Hen
> >
> > On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Henri Yandell wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I've been wanting to play with Clover, so took the time out to figure it
> > > out a little and run it on Lang. I generated the HTML report [there's a
> > > PDF, XML and a GUI as well] which is available at:
> > >
> > > http://www.flamefew.net/~hen/lang/clover_html/
> > >
> > > Clover seems like a pretty good tool to show us which bits aren't tested
> > > yet. I had included the reflect sub-package, but it sucks in comparison
> to
> > > the others test-wise so I decided to go just with 2.0.
> > >
> > > It's just a 30 day evaluation, but open-source projects can get free
> > > licences, so if it's of use we can do that.
> > >
> > > Hen
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [lang] Clover coverage report for Lang 2.0
Posted by Stephen Colebourne <sc...@btopenworld.com>.
Another clover run would be useful ;-)
We were at 86.6% overall, we should be a bit better now.
Hopefully lang and enum will be about 95%
Stephen
----- Original Message -----
From: "Henri Yandell" <ba...@generationjava.com>
>
> http://www.thecortex.net/clover/index.html is the clover homepage btw.
>
> It used to integrate into Maven, so I assume it still does. I'm not sure
> what the ? marks in the margin mean. I guess that it can't test them.
>
> Hen
>
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> >
> > I've been wanting to play with Clover, so took the time out to figure it
> > out a little and run it on Lang. I generated the HTML report [there's a
> > PDF, XML and a GUI as well] which is available at:
> >
> > http://www.flamefew.net/~hen/lang/clover_html/
> >
> > Clover seems like a pretty good tool to show us which bits aren't tested
> > yet. I had included the reflect sub-package, but it sucks in comparison
to
> > the others test-wise so I decided to go just with 2.0.
> >
> > It's just a 30 day evaluation, but open-source projects can get free
> > licences, so if it's of use we can do that.
> >
> > Hen
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [lang] Clover coverage report for Lang 2.0
Posted by Henri Yandell <ba...@generationjava.com>.
http://www.thecortex.net/clover/index.html is the clover homepage btw.
It used to integrate into Maven, so I assume it still does. I'm not sure
what the ? marks in the margin mean. I guess that it can't test them.
Hen
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> I've been wanting to play with Clover, so took the time out to figure it
> out a little and run it on Lang. I generated the HTML report [there's a
> PDF, XML and a GUI as well] which is available at:
>
> http://www.flamefew.net/~hen/lang/clover_html/
>
> Clover seems like a pretty good tool to show us which bits aren't tested
> yet. I had included the reflect sub-package, but it sucks in comparison to
> the others test-wise so I decided to go just with 2.0.
>
> It's just a 30 day evaluation, but open-source projects can get free
> licences, so if it's of use we can do that.
>
> Hen
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org