You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "Jeff Genender (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/01/18 18:31:31 UTC
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-2753) the "namingProviderUrl" element
does *not* appear to control which IP addresses the RMI service binds to
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12465820 ]
Jeff Genender commented on GERONIMO-2753:
-----------------------------------------
I fixed the hard code for the host attribute in 1.2...I will get 1.1 and 2.x fixed next.
> the "namingProviderUrl" element does *not* appear to control which IP addresses the RMI service binds to
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-2753
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2753
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: management
> Affects Versions: 1.1.1
> Environment: All
> Reporter: Leonard Flournoy
> Assigned To: Jeff Genender
> Fix For: 1.1.1
>
>
> Unfortunately, the "namingProviderUrl" element
> does *not* appear to control which IP addresses the RMI service binds to
> at the network level. In fact, from a quick look at the Geronimo source
> code, it appears that "0.0.0.0" is hard-coded as the IP address to which
> the RMI service binds:
> In
> modules/geronimo-system/src/main/java/org/apache/geronimo/system/rmi/RMI
> RegistryService.java:
> ----8<---
> public String getHost() {
> return "0.0.0.0";
> }
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira