[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-807) Docs can be explicit about multiple sub-workflow definitions being possible

["Harsh J (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15901172#comment-15901172 ] 

Harsh J commented on OOZIE-807:
-------------------------------

This one-liner doc patch should still apply. Reviews, anyone? [~rkanter] or [~rohini]?

> Docs can be explicit about multiple sub-workflow definitions being possible
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OOZIE-807
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-807
>             Project: Oozie
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: docs
>    Affects Versions: 3.2.0
>            Reporter: Harsh J
>            Assignee: Harsh J
>            Priority: Trivial
>         Attachments: OOZIE-807.patch, OOZIE-807.patch, OOZIE-807.patch
>
>
> With the feature that sub-workflows offer, a FAQ may be "Does Oozie allow multiple sub-workflow definitions in the same workflow?". I think the doc page about Sub-workflows should carry a line that makes it clear this is possible just in the same way as other action types.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)