Rails TurboLinks

[Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>]

>From its README file:
Compatibility

Turbolinks is designed to work with any browser that fully supports
pushState and all the related APIs. This includes Safari 6.0+ (but not
Safari 5.1.x!), IE10, and latest Chromes and Firefoxes.

Do note that existing JavaScript libraries may not all be compatible with
Turbolinks out of the box due to the change in instantiation cycle. You
might very well have to modify them to work with Turbolinks' new set of
events.


Is this really broadly used ?!


Can't you simulate it with a (Transparent)WebMarkupContainer that wraps all
the content in your page ?

Wicket filters the loaded CSS/JS resources anyway.

The only thing that's left is Browser Back button support.


On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Cedric Gatay <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:

> TurboLinks looks really cool, I think it could be a nice thing to have in
> Wicket for applications targeting recent web browsers.
>
> __
> Cedric Gatay (@Cedric_Gatay <http://twitter.com/Cedric_Gatay>)
> http://code-troopers.com | http://www.bloggure.info |
> http://cedric.gatay.fr
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigorov@apache.org
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes <
> > adrianosf@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Has anyone thought (or even known about) the knockoutjs library?
> >
> >
> > > I'm impressed with it, and I'm integrating it with our application
> (that
> > > integration means less wicket usage).
> > >
> >
> > Some of the developers in Lift Web Framework were also impressed by it.
> Now
> > they are more impressed from AngularJs/EmberJs/youNameItJs.
> > Few years ago everyone wrote his own Java web framework, now it is the
> same
> > but they use JavaScript :-)
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I'm wondering if someone has plans to do a good integration with Wicket
> > > components, where instead of add components to AJAX targets, only
> > > Javascript model objects would be changed and the controls would just
> > > repaint themselves.
> > >
> >
> > AjaxRequestTarget.appendJavaScript() ?!
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Adriano
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Rails TurboLinks

[Cedric Gatay <ga...@gmail.com>]

It seems to be integrated with JQuery quite easily (firing the ready()
event on page replacements). Anyway it looks like a "smart"
AjaxRequestTarget replacing the whole page (as you said through a WMC) and
dealing with url changes using HTML5 history API. I don't know if this is a
feature used in many applications though.

__
Cedric Gatay (@Cedric_Gatay <http://twitter.com/Cedric_Gatay>)
http://code-troopers.com | http://www.bloggure.info | http://cedric.gatay.fr


On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>wrote:

> From its README file:
> Compatibility
>
> Turbolinks is designed to work with any browser that fully supports
> pushState and all the related APIs. This includes Safari 6.0+ (but not
> Safari 5.1.x!), IE10, and latest Chromes and Firefoxes.
>
> Do note that existing JavaScript libraries may not all be compatible with
> Turbolinks out of the box due to the change in instantiation cycle. You
> might very well have to modify them to work with Turbolinks' new set of
> events.
>
>
> Is this really broadly used ?!
>
>
> Can't you simulate it with a (Transparent)WebMarkupContainer that wraps all
> the content in your page ?
>
> Wicket filters the loaded CSS/JS resources anyway.
>
> The only thing that's left is Browser Back button support.
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Cedric Gatay <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > TurboLinks looks really cool, I think it could be a nice thing to have in
> > Wicket for applications targeting recent web browsers.
> >
> > __
> > Cedric Gatay (@Cedric_Gatay <http://twitter.com/Cedric_Gatay>)
> > http://code-troopers.com | http://www.bloggure.info |
> > http://cedric.gatay.fr
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigorov@apache.org
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes <
> > > adrianosf@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Has anyone thought (or even known about) the knockoutjs library?
> > >
> > >
> > > > I'm impressed with it, and I'm integrating it with our application
> > (that
> > > > integration means less wicket usage).
> > > >
> > >
> > > Some of the developers in Lift Web Framework were also impressed by it.
> > Now
> > > they are more impressed from AngularJs/EmberJs/youNameItJs.
> > > Few years ago everyone wrote his own Java web framework, now it is the
> > same
> > > but they use JavaScript :-)
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm wondering if someone has plans to do a good integration with
> Wicket
> > > > components, where instead of add components to AJAX targets, only
> > > > Javascript model objects would be changed and the controls would just
> > > > repaint themselves.
> > > >
> > >
> > > AjaxRequestTarget.appendJavaScript() ?!
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Adriano
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>