You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@turbine.apache.org by Kelvin Tan <ke...@relevanz.com> on 2002/01/26 08:21:52 UTC
[torque] Packages for tables
I'd like to be able to specify that the OM class for a particular table belongs to a particular package. This is achieved via the schema probably by adding a "package" attribute to <table>.
Looking at Table.java however, I noticed that lines 103 and 165 indicate that previously, there was probably support for such a function, but it was commented out for some reason. Checking both jakarta-tubine-torque and jakarta-turbine-2's CVS logs for Table.java didn't yield any results.
Is there a particular reason why OM classes generated for a table can't be located in a separate package?
Regards,
Kelvin Tan
Relevanz Pte Ltd
http://www.relevanz.com
180B Bencoolen St.
The Bencoolen, #04-01
S(189648)
Tel: 238 6229
Fax: 337 4417
Re: [torque] Packages for tables
Posted by Kelvin Tan <ke...@relevanz.com>.
hmmm...I'll see what I can cook up then.
Kelvin
----- Original Message -----
From: Daniel Rall
To: Turbine Users List
Cc: Kelvin Tan
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 2:46 AM
Subject: Re: [torque] Packages for tables
"Kelvin Tan" <ke...@relevanz.com> writes:
> Is there a particular reason why OM classes generated for a table
> can't be located in a separate package?
I can't think of any reason off hand. Sounds like a nice feature to
have.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: [torque] Packages for tables
Posted by Daniel Rall <dl...@finemaltcoding.com>.
"Kelvin Tan" <ke...@relevanz.com> writes:
> Is there a particular reason why OM classes generated for a table
> can't be located in a separate package?
I can't think of any reason off hand. Sounds like a nice feature to
have.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>