You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to bugs@httpd.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2006/04/07 15:22:44 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39238] New: - mod_auth_dbm requires mod_auth or "no groups file?" error

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39238>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39238

           Summary: mod_auth_dbm requires mod_auth or "no groups file?"
                    error
           Product: Apache httpd-2
           Version: 2.0.55
          Platform: PC
               URL: http://jscomputerworks.com/
        OS/Version: Windows 2000
            Status: NEW
          Keywords: ErrorMessage
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: mod_auth_dbm
        AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org
        ReportedBy: js@jscomputerworks.com
                CC: js@jscomputerworks.com


Apache 2.0.55 on win2000 with mod_auth worked great. I disabled mod_auth and 
tried mod_auth_dbm with no AuthDBMGroupFile directive since all I want to check 
are username and password. Got the error message "configuration error:  couldn't 
check access.  No groups file?". A google check of this revealed that many 
different authentication schemes were encountering this error message and I 
didn't see any answers. After much configuration experimentation, I re-enabled 
mod_auth along with mod_auth_dbm, and then mod_auth_worked! I suspect this 
dependency is not wanted.  As a minimum, the mod_auth_dbm documentation should 
note this dependency.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39238] - mod_auth_dbm requires mod_auth or "no groups file?" error

Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39238>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39238





------- Additional Comments From bnicholes@apache.org  2006-04-07 16:42 -------
The dependancy actually exists in the httpd core rather than with the modules 
themselves.  The problem is that the ap_run_check_user_id and the 
ap_run_auth_checker hooks are tied very closely together in the request 
processing.  Without mod_auth loaded, there is no valid-user handler 
implemented.  And since you decided not to use the group authorization 
handler, nothing handled the ap_run_auth_checker hook so it threw an error.  
Unfortunately the error message, rather than telling you what really happened, 
gave you some error about "no groups file" which is targeted directly at 
mod_auth.  

This issue will still exist in Apache 2.2 but the auth architecture of 2.2 
makes it more clear that you need to have the correct authz module loaded to 
handle the authorization hook.  Apache 2.3 eliminates this problem by 
decoupling the various auth hooks and extending the definition of 
authorization.  mod_auth_dbm in Apache 2.3 will work as you expect it to.  But 
unfortunatly the 2.3 functionality can not be back ported into 2.0 or 2.2.  
However, Jeff's patch should get you what you want.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39238] - mod_auth_dbm requires mod_auth or "no groups file?" error

Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39238>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39238





------- Additional Comments From trawick@apache.org  2006-04-07 16:14 -------
I posted this to the development list a while back but didn't get any feedback.
Does it work for you (i.e., allow mod_auth_dbm to stand on its own two feet)?

http://people.apache.org/~trawick/auth_dbm.txt

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org