You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Michael Davey <Mi...@coderage.org> on 2004/02/29 20:49:30 UTC
[all] LICENSE vs LICENSE.txt (was: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-commons-sandbox/commons-jjar
failed)
Gump 'bot (pretending to be Ted Husted) wrote:
[snip]
>Project commons-jjar has an issue affecting it's community integration. The current state is 'Failed', for reason 'Build Failed'
>
>
[snip]
>BUILD FAILED
>/data3/gump/jakarta-commons-sandbox/jjar/build.xml:173: Warning: Could not find file /data3/gump/jakarta-commons-sandbox/jjar/LICENSE to copy.
>
>
I thought that the idea was that the prefered name is without an extension:
<quote href="http://apache.org/dev/apply-license.html">
*Can the LICENSE and NOTICE files be called LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt?*
This is permitted. However the preference is that the files be called
LICENSE and NOTICE.
</quote>
--
Michael
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [all] LICENSE vs LICENSE.txt (was: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-commons-sandbox/commons-jjar failed)
Posted by Stephen Colebourne <sc...@btopenworld.com>.
> I thought that the idea was that the prefered name is without an
extension:
>
> <quote href="http://apache.org/dev/apply-license.html">
>
> *Can the LICENSE and NOTICE files be called LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt?*
>
> This is permitted. However the preference is that the files be called
> LICENSE and NOTICE.
Commons has all been done with .txt suffixes as its much easier to deal
with.
Stephen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [all] LICENSE vs LICENSE.txt (was: [GUMP@lsd]: jakarta-commons-sandbox/commons-jjar failed)
Posted by "Adam R. B. Jack" <aj...@trysybase.com>.
It doesn't matter to Gump which you chose, the main thing is that if the
Gump descriptor for a project references a license filename, and that
filename is missing, it'll complain.
That has caught us on few LICENSE <-> LICENSE.txt changes recently.
regards
Adam
----- Original Message -----
From: "Henri Yandell" <ba...@generationjava.com>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <co...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 12:55 PM
Subject: Re: [all] LICENSE vs LICENSE.txt (was: [GUMP@lsd]:
jakarta-commons-sandbox/commons-jjar failed)
>
> My fault, I thought it was the other way around for Commons.
>
> Hen
>
> On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Michael Davey wrote:
>
> > Gump 'bot (pretending to be Ted Husted) wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > >Project commons-jjar has an issue affecting it's community integration.
The current state is 'Failed', for reason 'Build Failed'
> > >
> > >
> > [snip]
> >
> > >BUILD FAILED
> > >/data3/gump/jakarta-commons-sandbox/jjar/build.xml:173: Warning: Could
not find file /data3/gump/jakarta-commons-sandbox/jjar/LICENSE to copy.
> > >
> > >
> > I thought that the idea was that the prefered name is without an
extension:
> >
> > <quote href="http://apache.org/dev/apply-license.html">
> >
> > *Can the LICENSE and NOTICE files be called LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt?*
> >
> > This is permitted. However the preference is that the files be called
> > LICENSE and NOTICE.
> >
> > </quote>
> >
> > --
> > Michael
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [all] LICENSE vs LICENSE.txt (was: [GUMP@lsd]:
jakarta-commons-sandbox/commons-jjar failed)
Posted by Henri Yandell <ba...@generationjava.com>.
My fault, I thought it was the other way around for Commons.
Hen
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Michael Davey wrote:
> Gump 'bot (pretending to be Ted Husted) wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> >Project commons-jjar has an issue affecting it's community integration. The current state is 'Failed', for reason 'Build Failed'
> >
> >
> [snip]
>
> >BUILD FAILED
> >/data3/gump/jakarta-commons-sandbox/jjar/build.xml:173: Warning: Could not find file /data3/gump/jakarta-commons-sandbox/jjar/LICENSE to copy.
> >
> >
> I thought that the idea was that the prefered name is without an extension:
>
> <quote href="http://apache.org/dev/apply-license.html">
>
> *Can the LICENSE and NOTICE files be called LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt?*
>
> This is permitted. However the preference is that the files be called
> LICENSE and NOTICE.
>
> </quote>
>
> --
> Michael
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org