You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@httpd.apache.org by Dermot <pa...@googlemail.com> on 2008/11/21 18:31:52 UTC
[users@httpd] vhosts on 1.3.28
Hi,
I have recently inherited a system that uses 2 httpd binaries. One
listens on port 80, the other (on port81) is a modperl enabled binary
whereby, with the power of some rewritting from the port 80 listener,
stuff ends up on port 81.
I had to create a second vhost for the modperl binary to listen on
port 8181. The approach I took was to use name-based vhosts. I
followed the examples at
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/1.3/vhosts/name-based.html
My issue is that I am have had to enable specific clients with Allow
statements and I am not sure that's approach is goig to be practical.
My current config uses
NameVirtualHost *
<VirtualHost *>
ServerName ....
Can I use a port based system? So
NameVirtualHost *:81
<VirtualHost *:81>
ServerName ...
I thought I'd seen something like that on this list. Is that possible
with 1.3.24? My thinking is that perhaps with this method the client
will the localhost and I can just Allow 127.0.0.1 rather than having
to extend the allow statements the service grows.
Does my approach seem sound or would there be a better way?
TIA,
Dp.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The official User-To-User support forum of the Apache HTTP Server Project.
See <URL:http://httpd.apache.org/userslist.html> for more info.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
" from the digest: users-digest-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@httpd.apache.org