Re: WWW Form Bug Report: "only a question about HEAD response" on OTHER: (fwd)

[Ben Laurie <be...@gonzo.ben.algroup.co.uk>]

> 
> 
> I was tempted to just say "no", but thought I'd check.
> 
> If the answer is indeed "no", please Cc the submitter.
> 
> 
> Forwarded message:
> > From nobody@hyperreal.com  Fri Oct  6 06:47:24 1995
> > Message-Id: <19...@taz.hyperreal.com>
> > From: davidmsl@anti.tesi.dsi.unimi.it
> > To: apache-bugs%apache.org@organic.com
> > Date: Fri Oct  6  6:47:04 1995
> > Subject: WWW Form Bug Report: "only a question about HEAD response" on OTHER:
> > 
> > Submitter: davidmsl@anti.tesi.dsi.unimi.it
> > Operating system: OTHER:, version: 
> > Extra Modules used: 
> > URL exhibiting problem: 
> > 
> > Symptoms:
> > --
> > Sorry, but I didn't know the right address to use to write to someone of the Apache team... I'd like to know if your server handle (but I haven't found anything in the documentation) or will handle the HTTP-EQUIV meta tag. Davide Musella davidmsl@anti.tesi.dsi.unimi.it 
> > --
> > 
> > Backtrace:
> > --
> > 
> > --
> > 
> 

It was my understanding that HTTP-EQUIV was a client side function
(specifically designed for use with servers that don't support the desired
headers). I could be wrong.

-- 
Ben Laurie                  Phone: +44 (181) 994 6435
Freelance Consultant        Fax:   +44 (181) 994 6472
and Technical Director      Email: ben@algroup.co.uk
A.L. Digital Ltd,
London, England.