You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cordova.apache.org by Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com> on 2015/06/17 20:37:03 UTC
Update plugin's package.json git url to github mirrors.
How do people feel about changing the repo field in the package.json for
our plugins to point to the github mirror instead of apache git repo?
The url gets listed at https://www.npmjs.com/package/cordova-plugin-camera
on the left. The github mirror is much nicer looking and we receive all of
our PRs on github too.
Thoughts?
Re: Update plugin's package.json git url to github mirrors.
Posted by Carlos Santana <cs...@gmail.com>.
That was source and dist, not fist :-) even though I had my fist up while
writing this email
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 10:00 PM Carlos Santana <cs...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Right Right +1
>
> We can move our bugs to GitHub its up to the active committers to decide
> and make it happen since they are the ones that has the most work to deal
> with short term. Maintain both systems during some transition time I guess.
>
> Canonical source and a fist its what's need to remain on apache servers.
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:10 PM Murat Sutunc <mu...@microsoft.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes +1 !
>> Now if only we could move our bugs as well :P
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jesse [mailto:purplecabbage@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 11:57 AM
>> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Update plugin's package.json git url to github mirrors.
>>
>> +1 easier onboarding of contributors
>>
>>
>> My team is hiring!
>> @purplecabbage
>> risingj.com
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Shazron <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 this will drive more contribution.
>> > Keeping it to Apache git doesn't help the project -- since the
>> > committers already know where the main repo is, but this would confuse
>> others.
>> >
>> > Not sure about multiple repository fields, I suppose it's possible...
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > How do people feel about changing the repo field in the package.json
>> > > for our plugins to point to the github mirror instead of apache git
>> repo?
>> > >
>> > > The url gets listed at
>> > https://www.npmjs.com/package/cordova-plugin-camera
>> > > on the left. The github mirror is much nicer looking and we receive
>> > > all
>> > of
>> > > our PRs on github too.
>> > >
>> > > Thoughts?
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
Re: Update plugin's package.json git url to github mirrors.
Posted by Carlos Santana <cs...@gmail.com>.
Right Right +1
We can move our bugs to GitHub its up to the active committers to decide
and make it happen since they are the ones that has the most work to deal
with short term. Maintain both systems during some transition time I guess.
Canonical source and a fist its what's need to remain on apache servers.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 3:10 PM Murat Sutunc <mu...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Yes +1 !
> Now if only we could move our bugs as well :P
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jesse [mailto:purplecabbage@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 11:57 AM
> To: dev@cordova.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Update plugin's package.json git url to github mirrors.
>
> +1 easier onboarding of contributors
>
>
> My team is hiring!
> @purplecabbage
> risingj.com
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Shazron <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 this will drive more contribution.
> > Keeping it to Apache git doesn't help the project -- since the
> > committers already know where the main repo is, but this would confuse
> others.
> >
> > Not sure about multiple repository fields, I suppose it's possible...
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > How do people feel about changing the repo field in the package.json
> > > for our plugins to point to the github mirror instead of apache git
> repo?
> > >
> > > The url gets listed at
> > https://www.npmjs.com/package/cordova-plugin-camera
> > > on the left. The github mirror is much nicer looking and we receive
> > > all
> > of
> > > our PRs on github too.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> >
>
RE: Update plugin's package.json git url to github mirrors.
Posted by Murat Sutunc <mu...@microsoft.com>.
Yes +1 !
Now if only we could move our bugs as well :P
-----Original Message-----
From: Jesse [mailto:purplecabbage@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2015 11:57 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Update plugin's package.json git url to github mirrors.
+1 easier onboarding of contributors
My team is hiring!
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Shazron <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 this will drive more contribution.
> Keeping it to Apache git doesn't help the project -- since the
> committers already know where the main repo is, but this would confuse others.
>
> Not sure about multiple repository fields, I suppose it's possible...
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > How do people feel about changing the repo field in the package.json
> > for our plugins to point to the github mirror instead of apache git repo?
> >
> > The url gets listed at
> https://www.npmjs.com/package/cordova-plugin-camera
> > on the left. The github mirror is much nicer looking and we receive
> > all
> of
> > our PRs on github too.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
>
Re: Update plugin's package.json git url to github mirrors.
Posted by Jesse <pu...@gmail.com>.
+1 easier onboarding of contributors
My team is hiring!
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Shazron <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 this will drive more contribution.
> Keeping it to Apache git doesn't help the project -- since the committers
> already know where the main repo is, but this would confuse others.
>
> Not sure about multiple repository fields, I suppose it's possible...
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > How do people feel about changing the repo field in the package.json for
> > our plugins to point to the github mirror instead of apache git repo?
> >
> > The url gets listed at
> https://www.npmjs.com/package/cordova-plugin-camera
> > on the left. The github mirror is much nicer looking and we receive all
> of
> > our PRs on github too.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
>
Re: Update plugin's package.json git url to github mirrors.
Posted by Shazron <sh...@gmail.com>.
+1 this will drive more contribution.
Keeping it to Apache git doesn't help the project -- since the committers
already know where the main repo is, but this would confuse others.
Not sure about multiple repository fields, I suppose it's possible...
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> How do people feel about changing the repo field in the package.json for
> our plugins to point to the github mirror instead of apache git repo?
>
> The url gets listed at https://www.npmjs.com/package/cordova-plugin-camera
> on the left. The github mirror is much nicer looking and we receive all of
> our PRs on github too.
>
> Thoughts?
>
Re: Update plugin's package.json git url to github mirrors.
Posted by Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Steven Gill <st...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> How do people feel about changing the repo field in the package.json for
> our plugins to point to the github mirror instead of apache git repo?
>
> The url gets listed at https://www.npmjs.com/package/cordova-plugin-camera
> on the left. The github mirror is much nicer looking and we receive all of
> our PRs on github too.
>
On the right not left...
>
>
Thoughts?
>