You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "n. alex rupp" <ru...@umn.edu> on 2003/09/22 20:47:30 UTC

[console] [web] Next round of changes and features

Hello everyone,

I'm working on the console.web module and I would welcome any help,
especially from anyone with a good eye for graphic design and a lot of
experience writing JSP tag libraries.

I'm about to start on the next couple of features for the console.  It
involves extending what I've already done and adding the ability to change
the properties of an MBean.

Actually, I prepared a patch to fix some of the naming inconsistencies (I
don't think users should have to type "jmx-console" as a URL for the
application, but should rather have to type "console"), but I'm not certain
that I prepared the patch correctly.  I'm used to going straight through
CVS, so this was a little worrying.  I was hoping I could get some help
verifying the patch so I could check it into Jira and comfortably move
forward, but I know several of the committers are busy this week with their
"real" jobs so they won't have time to do this.

It is precisely for reasons like this that I was hesitant to commit the
console as a new module to the project in the first place.  I'm not certain
what the best route is for moving forward.  Proxy access via the committers
is a hassle for everyone involved, particularly since my work isn't required
(to my knowledge) by any specification and is therefore not mission
critical.

Anyway, I'm going to get started on another round of features for the
console.  I'd like to add an application view and enable write access for
write-enabled fields.  I make heavy use of simple servlet technology and JMX
technology (which I'm happy to expain if there are questions).  So, anyone
interested in helping me out should let me know.

Someone mentioned a while back that there was an SF project that built a
bunch of custom JSP tags for accessing JMX resources.  Does anyone know
anything more about that?

Looking forward to hearing from some of the newer faces.

Best,
--
N. Alex  Rupp (n_alex_rupp@users.sf.net)



Re: [console] [web] Next round of changes and features

Posted by Siva <si...@sivasundaram.com>.
May be I can be work on this.let me know the things to do
so that we can work together.

Siva

----- Original Message -----
From: "n. alex rupp" <ru...@umn.edu>
To: <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 12:17 AM
Subject: [console] [web] Next round of changes and features


> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm working on the console.web module and I would welcome any help,
> especially from anyone with a good eye for graphic design and a lot of
> experience writing JSP tag libraries.
>
> I'm about to start on the next couple of features for the console.  It
> involves extending what I've already done and adding the ability to change
> the properties of an MBean.
>
> Actually, I prepared a patch to fix some of the naming inconsistencies (I
> don't think users should have to type "jmx-console" as a URL for the
> application, but should rather have to type "console"), but I'm not
certain
> that I prepared the patch correctly.  I'm used to going straight through
> CVS, so this was a little worrying.  I was hoping I could get some help
> verifying the patch so I could check it into Jira and comfortably move
> forward, but I know several of the committers are busy this week with
their
> "real" jobs so they won't have time to do this.
>
> It is precisely for reasons like this that I was hesitant to commit the
> console as a new module to the project in the first place.  I'm not
certain
> what the best route is for moving forward.  Proxy access via the
committers
> is a hassle for everyone involved, particularly since my work isn't
required
> (to my knowledge) by any specification and is therefore not mission
> critical.
>
> Anyway, I'm going to get started on another round of features for the
> console.  I'd like to add an application view and enable write access for
> write-enabled fields.  I make heavy use of simple servlet technology and
JMX
> technology (which I'm happy to expain if there are questions).  So, anyone
> interested in helping me out should let me know.
>
> Someone mentioned a while back that there was an SF project that built a
> bunch of custom JSP tags for accessing JMX resources.  Does anyone know
> anything more about that?
>
> Looking forward to hearing from some of the newer faces.
>
> Best,
> --
> N. Alex  Rupp (n_alex_rupp@users.sf.net)