You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mina.apache.org by "Emmanuel Lecharny (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/06/13 16:53:51 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (DIRMINA-838) Redundant AttributeKey allocation resulting in high garbage collector activity

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048584#comment-13048584 ] 

Emmanuel Lecharny commented on DIRMINA-838:
-------------------------------------------

Interestng question. It has been changed a while back to be static, but we gor some failures back then. 

Any reason why you have so any AttributeKeys stuck in memory ? They should be discarded as soon as the session is terminated.

> Redundant AttributeKey allocation resulting  in high garbage collector activity
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DIRMINA-838
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-838
>             Project: MINA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Filter
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.3
>         Environment: java version "1.6.0_22"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_22-b04)
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 17.1-b03, mixed mode)
>            Reporter: Platon Potapov
>
> The classes CumulativeProtocolDecoder and ProtocolCodecFilter (there are others too, but these two are the important ones for our project) have members of type AttributeKey declared as:
>     private final AttributeKey ENCODER = new AttributeKey(ProtocolCodecFilter.class, "encoder");
> As can be seen, these are not static, so each time ProtocolCodecFilter is created, AttributeKey objects get created as well, which in turn involves creation of a lot of String and char[] objects. jProfiler indicates that AttributeKey is accountable for creation of about 85% of all Strings and char[] in runs of our project, so it makes a significant difference for us.
> Is it OK for these attribute key objects to be singletons? If not, what would take to make them singletons?
> Some of other MINA filters have AttributeKeys as static members (e.g. MdcInjectionFilter, SslFilter).
> To summarize: the improvement being requested is to make the pre-defined AttributeKey objects static within classes such as CumulativeProtocolDecoder and ProtocolCodecFilter.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira